arrow left
arrow right
  • Sonny St. John Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, v. Cloopen Group Holding Limited, Changxun Sun, Yipeng Li, Kui Zhou, Qingsheng Zheng, Xiaodong Liang, Zi Yang, Ming Liao, Feng Zhu, Lok Yan Hui, Jianhong Zhou, Ching Chiu, Cogency Global Inc., Colleen A. Devries, Goldman Sachs (Asia) L.L.C., Citigroup Global Markets, Inc., China International Capital Corporation Hong Kong Securities Limited, Tiger Brokers (Nz) Limited, Futu, Inc.Commercial Division document preview
  • Sonny St. John Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, v. Cloopen Group Holding Limited, Changxun Sun, Yipeng Li, Kui Zhou, Qingsheng Zheng, Xiaodong Liang, Zi Yang, Ming Liao, Feng Zhu, Lok Yan Hui, Jianhong Zhou, Ching Chiu, Cogency Global Inc., Colleen A. Devries, Goldman Sachs (Asia) L.L.C., Citigroup Global Markets, Inc., China International Capital Corporation Hong Kong Securities Limited, Tiger Brokers (Nz) Limited, Futu, Inc.Commercial Division document preview
						
                                

Preview

Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati Professional Corporation 1301 Avenue of the Americas 40th Floor New York, New York 10019-6022 O: 212.999.5800 F: 212.999.5899 August 1, 2022 VIA NYSCEF The Honorable Andrew Borrok Supreme Court of the State of New York Commercial Division, Part 53 60 Centre Street New York, New York 10007 Re: Sonny St. John v. Cloopen Group Holding Limited et al., No. 652617/2021 Dear Justice Borrok: As counsel for Cloopen Group Holding Limited (“Cloopen”), we write pursuant to Rule 18 of the Commercial Division of the Supreme Court and Your Honor’s Part 53 – Practices and Procedures to inform the Court of post-submission court decisions that are relevant to the issues pending before the Court in advance of the oral argument scheduled for August 3, 2022 on the Motion to Dismiss filed by Defendants Cloopen (Motion Seq. No. 003) and joined by Cogency Global Inc., Goldman Sachs (Asia) L.L.C., Citigroup Global Markets Inc., Tiger Brokers (NZ) Limited, and Futu, Inc. (Motion Seq. Nos. 004 and 005). The relevant decisions are: (1) Ret. Bd. of Allegheny Cnty. v. Ping Identity Holding Corp., No. 654912/2021, 74 Misc. 3d 1232(A), 165 N.Y.S.3d 689 (N.Y. Sup. Ct., N.Y. Cnty. Apr. 20, 2022) (Borrok, J.); and (2) Wandel v. Gao, No. 1:20-cv-03259 (PAC), 2022 WL 768975 (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 14, 2022). We are available at the Court’s convenience to address any questions. Respectfully submitted, WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI Professional Corporation s/ Sheryl Shapiro Bassin Sheryl Shapiro Bassin cc: All Counsel of Record (via NYSCEF) AUSTIN BEIJING BOSTON BOULDER BRUSSELS HONG KONG LONDON LOS ANGELES NEW YORK PALO ALTO SALT LAKE CITY SAN DIEGO SAN FRANCISCO SEATTLE SHANGHAI WASHINGTON, DC WILMINGTON, DE