arrow left
arrow right
  • RODRICK BRECKLER et al VS. ASBESTOS DEFENDANTS (B*P) AS REFLECTED ON et al ASBESTOS document preview
  • RODRICK BRECKLER et al VS. ASBESTOS DEFENDANTS (B*P) AS REFLECTED ON et al ASBESTOS document preview
  • RODRICK BRECKLER et al VS. ASBESTOS DEFENDANTS (B*P) AS REFLECTED ON et al ASBESTOS document preview
  • RODRICK BRECKLER et al VS. ASBESTOS DEFENDANTS (B*P) AS REFLECTED ON et al ASBESTOS document preview
  • RODRICK BRECKLER et al VS. ASBESTOS DEFENDANTS (B*P) AS REFLECTED ON et al ASBESTOS document preview
  • RODRICK BRECKLER et al VS. ASBESTOS DEFENDANTS (B*P) AS REFLECTED ON et al ASBESTOS document preview 
						
                                
Preview

                                POBOX 6169
NOVATO, CALIFORNIA 94948-6169
(ALS) 898-1555

BRAYTON®PURCELL LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
222 RUSH LANDING ROAD

oO 8B RM DH BR DN me

MN YY MY NY BR NY De me ee ee te
e YA WAR GDN FF Oe A AaAEDAH A

ALAN R. BRAYTON, ESQ,, S.B. #73685
LLOYD F. LEROY, ESQ., $.B. #203502

RICHARD M. GRANT, ESO., S.B. #55677 ELECTRONICALLY
BRAYTON¢#PURCELL LLP FILED
Attorneys at Law Superior Court of California,
222 Rush Landing Road 2 i300
P.O. Box 6169 iS County of San Francisco
Novato, California 94948-6169 JAN 18 2011
(415) 898-1555 Clerk of the Court
Tentative Ruling Contest Email: contestasbestosTR@braytonlaw.com BY: MELISSA DONG

Deputy Clerk
Attorneys for Plaintiffs

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA

COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
RODRICK BRECKLER and ASBESTOS
JOANN BRECKLER, No. CGC-08-274566

Plaintiffs,

APPEAL; NOTICE OF ELECTION TO
PROCEED UNDER CALIFORNIA RULES
OF COURT, RULE 8.124

[OCP § 904.1]

vs,

} DESIGNATION OF RECORD ON
: )
ASBESTOS DEFENDANTS (BP) J

TO DEFENDANT HENNESSY INDUSTRIES, INC., ITS ATTORNEYS OF RECORD, AND
THE CLERK OF THE ABOVE-ENTITLED COURT:

Pursuant to California Code of Civil Procedure § 904.1(a)(1), Plaintiffs-Appellants
RODRICK BRECKLER, et al., appeals to the California Court of Appeal, First Appellate
District, from the Judgment on the Pleadings entered into on January 3, 2011 in favor of
Defendant HENNESSY INDUSTRIES, INC. Notice of Entry of Judgment was served on
January 11, 2011.

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Plaintiff-Appellant elects to proceed under California
Rules of Court, Rule 8.124 and file appendices or a joint appendix in lieu of a Clerk’s
Transcript.
ul

K Mpjured\10874 Rappetiate\Designation wod ]
DES: TION GF RECORD ON APPEAL; NOTICE OF ELECTION TO PROCEED UNDER CALIFORNIA

RULES OF COURT, RIOo Pm RW DN HW RF Bw

RN MY MM NM NR RD Rm mm eee
eS TA A BD N = SO OW YU KR A kB BY @

NOTICE I$ FURTHER GIVEN that Plaintiffs-Appellants, pursuant to California Rules
of Court, Rule 8.130, hereby designates the following proceeding for inclusion in the reporter’s
transcript on appeal:

September 21, 2010, transcript of hearing of defendant HENNESSY INDUSTRIES,
INC.’S Motion for Summary Judgment, San Francisco Superior Court, Department 220,
Honorable Harold E. Kahn presiding, reported by certified court reporter Lavena Ward, 7077.
Dated: January 14, 2011 BRAYTON PURCELL LLP

BY:  /s/ Lloyd F. LeRoy
Lloyd F. LeRoy (SB# 203502)
Attorneys for Plaintiff-Appellant
RODRICK BRECKLER, et al.

K.UUniured\tOR Ts Rappeltere\Designstion wed

DESIQNAT JON OF RECORD ON APPEAL; NOTICE SF ELECTIONS PROCEED UNDER CALIFORNIAwo wm QA WH BF WY NY &

NR RNR Net tate
eR A A UN = SD oO wm IRD NH RB HWY mm

PROOF OF SERVICE BY MAIL

Jam employed in the County of Marin, State of California. Iam over the age of 18
ears and am not a party to the within action. My business address is 222 Rush Landing Road,
.O. Box 6169, Novato, California 94948-6169.

On January 14, 2011, I served the following document(s) described as:

DESIGNATION OF RECORD ON APPEAL; NOTICE OF ELECTION TO PROCEED
UNDER CALIFORNIA RULES OF COURT, RULE 8.124

on the interested party(ies) in this action as follows:

HENNESSY INDUSTRIES, INC.
Steve Sobel, Esq.

GORDON & REES LLP

101 West Broadway, Ste. 2000
San Diego, CA 92101

{61 9) 696-6700

(619) 696-7124 Fax

XX BY OFFICE MAILING

lam readily familiar with this office's practice of collection and processing
correspondence, pleadings and other matters for mailing with the United States Postal
Service on that same day with postage thereon fully prepaid at Novato, California in the
ordinary course of business. I placed in the outgoing office mail, the above-described
document(s), in a sealed envelope, addressed to the party(ies) as stated above, for
collection and processing for mailing the same day in accordance with ordinary office
practices.

Executed January 14. 2011, at Novato, California.
I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the

foregoing is true and correct.
Sheun.

“Jane at

Rodrick Breckler et al.v. Asbestos Defi
San Francisco Superior Court Case No. CGC-08-274566

E.Abojuredt 108747 ppeete Designation apd
PROOF OF SERVICE BY MAIL