arrow left
arrow right
  • RODRICK BRECKLER et al VS. ASBESTOS DEFENDANTS (B*P) AS REFLECTED ON et al ASBESTOS document preview
  • RODRICK BRECKLER et al VS. ASBESTOS DEFENDANTS (B*P) AS REFLECTED ON et al ASBESTOS document preview
  • RODRICK BRECKLER et al VS. ASBESTOS DEFENDANTS (B*P) AS REFLECTED ON et al ASBESTOS document preview
  • RODRICK BRECKLER et al VS. ASBESTOS DEFENDANTS (B*P) AS REFLECTED ON et al ASBESTOS document preview 
						
                                
Preview

                                C0 DO MB DAD A RW Nm

Deh
mM Oo © © YN BW & WwW Mm &

22

STEVEN SPAULDING, State Bar No. 148392
LEOPOLDO J. CHANCO, State Bar No. 136083

HOAGLAND, LONGO, MORAN, DUNST & DOUKAS, LLP ELECTRONICALLY

333 Pine Street, Sth Floor FILED

San Francisco, CA 94104 Superior Court of California,

Telephone: (415) 781-7050 County of San Francisco

Attorneys for Defendant M AR ‘5 2011

AIRGAS-NORTHERN CALIFORNIA & NEVADA, INC. BY: WILLIAM TRUPEK
Deputy Clerk

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
RODRICK BRECKLER and JOANN No. CGC-08-274566

BRECKLER,
DEFENDANT AIRGAS-NORTHERN
Plaintiffs, CALIFORNIA & NEVADA, INC.'S
JOINDER IN DEFENDANT SAN JOSE
v. BOILER WORKS' OPPOSITION TO
PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR ORDER
ASBESTOS DEFENDANTS (BP) GRANTING PREFERENCE IN
SETTING CASE FOR TRIAL, AND
Defendants. EXTENDING DISCOVERY CUTOFF

DATE: March 30, 2011
TIME: 9:30 a.m.
DEPT: 220

JUDGE Hon. Harold E. Kahn
TRIAL: None set

Defendant AIRGAS-NORTHERN CALIFORNIA & NEVADA, INC. (“AIRGAS”) hereby
joins in and incorporates herein by reference Defendant SAN JOSE BOILER WORKS?’ Opposition
to Plaintiffs’ Motion for Order Granting Prerference in Setting Case for Trial, and Extending
Discovery Cutoff (“Opposition”) in its entirety. AIRGAS adopts the authorities and arguments set

forth in the Opposition as if set forth in their entirety herein.

Dated: March 15, 2011 HOAGLAND, LONGO, MO!

By: wo [Le
LEOPOLDO TC
Attorneys for Deferfdant
AIRGAS-NORTHERN CALIFORNIA & NEVADA, INC.

, DUNST & DOUKAS, LLP

-1-
DEPENDANT AIRGAS-NORTHERN CALIFORNIA & NEVADA, INC'S JOINDER IN DEFENDANT SAN
JOSE BOILER WORKS' OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFES' MOTION FOR ORDER GRANTING PREFERENCE
IN SETTING CASE FOR TRIAL, AND EXTENDING DISCOVERY CUTOFF2

3

4

5

6

7

8

g

10

1

2

3

4

15

6

7

18

9

20

21

22

23

24

Attoremys at Law 26
333 Ping Street

Santrereien,04 27

CASE NAME: Breckler, Rodrick and Joann Breckler v. Asbestos Defendants (B-P)

DOCKET NO.: CGC-08-274566

DOCUMENT: Defendant Airgas-Northern California & Nevada, Inc.'s Joinder in Defendant San
Jose Boiler Works’ Opposition to Plaintiffs’ Motion for order Granting Preference in Setting Case
for Trial and Extending Discovery Cutoff

PROOF OF SERVICE BY ELECTRONIC TRANSMISSION

lam employed in the County of San Francisco, State of California. I am over the age
of 18 and not a party to the within action; my business address is 333 Pine Street, Fifth Floor, San
Francisco, California 94104,

On the below stated date, I electronically served the above named document on the
recipients designated on the Transaction Receipt located on the LexisNexis File & Serve website.

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the

foregoing is true and correct and that this declaration was executed on March 15, 2011 in San

Ue. Gee dle
By: ‘
gina M. McCall

Francisco, California.