arrow left
arrow right
  • BEACON RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION VS. CATELLUS THIRD AND KING LLC et al CONSTRUCTION document preview
  • BEACON RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION VS. CATELLUS THIRD AND KING LLC et al CONSTRUCTION document preview
  • BEACON RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION VS. CATELLUS THIRD AND KING LLC et al CONSTRUCTION document preview
  • BEACON RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION VS. CATELLUS THIRD AND KING LLC et al CONSTRUCTION document preview
  • BEACON RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION VS. CATELLUS THIRD AND KING LLC et al CONSTRUCTION document preview
  • BEACON RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION VS. CATELLUS THIRD AND KING LLC et al CONSTRUCTION document preview
						
                                

Preview

EU SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO | Document Scanning Lead Sheet Sep-26-2012 1:56 pm Case Number: CGC-08-478453 Filing Date: Sep-26-2012 1:54 Filed by: Juke Box: 001 Image: 03780204 REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE BEACON RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION VS. CATELLUS THIRD AND KING LLC et al 001003780204 Instructions: Please place this sheet on top of the document to be scanned.WOOD, SMITH, HENNING & BERMAN LLP Attorneys at Law 1401 WILLOW PASS ROAD, SUITE 700 CONCORD, CALIFORNIA 94520-7982 TELEPHONE 925 222 3400 # Fax 925 222 3250 4 S a 2N~T VA i oo ON OD HO FB WN = Stacey F. Blank (State Bar No. 174378) David S. Webster (State Bar No. 154301) Woon, SmitH, HENNING & BERMAN LLP 1401 Willow Pass Road, Suite 700 Concord, California 94520-7982 Phone: 925 222 3400 ¢ Fax: 925 356 8250 John A. Koeppel (State Bar No. 71526) Todd J. Wenzel (State Bar No. 158880) Ropers, MAJESKI, KOHN & BENTLEY 201 Spear Street, Suite 1000 San Francisco, CA 94105 Phone: 415 543 4800 # Fax: 415 972 6301 Attorneys for Defendants, CATELLUS THIRD AND KING LLC; CATELLUS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION; CATELLUS COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT CORP.; CATELLUS OPERATING LIMITED PARTNERSHIP; CATELLUS URBAN DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION; CATELLUS URBAN DEVELOPMENT GROUP LLC; THIRD AND KING INVESTORS LLC; and PROLOGIS SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO - UNLIMITED JURISDICTION BEACON RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITY CASE NO. CGC-08-478453 ASSOCIATION, REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE IN Plaintiff, SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR SUMMARY ADJUDICATION OF CATELLUS TO v. PLAINTIFF'S EIGHTH CAUSE OF CATELLUS THIRD AND KING LLC; ACTION FOR CONCEALMENT AND CATELLUS DEVELOPMENT PUNITIVE DAMAGES IN THE THIRD CORPORATION, et al. AMENDED COMPLAINT Defendants. Complaint Filed: August 8, 2009 AND RELATED CROSS-ACTIONS DATE: December 14, 2012 TIME: 10:00 a.m. DEPT.: 304 JUDGE: Hon. Richard Kramer Trial Date: February 4, 2013 LEGAL:05863-0005/2417846.1 -1- REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR SUMMARY ADJUDICATIONAttorneys at Law 1401 WILLOW PASS ROAD, SUITE 700 CONCORD, CALIFORNIA 94520-7982 WOOD, SMITH, HENNING & BERMAN LLP TELEPHONE 925 222 3400 # Fax 925 222 3250 CoO MW ND ON BF WHY A= = Defendants CATELLUS THIRD AND KING LLC, CATELLUS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION; CATELLUS COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT CORP.; CATELLUS OPERATING LIMITED PARTNERSHIP; CATELLUS URBAN DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION; CATELLUS URBAN DEVELOPMENT GROUP LLC; THIRD AND KING INVESTORS LLC; and PROLOGIS (collectively "CATELLUS"), through their attorneys of record, request the Court take judicial notice pursuant to Evidence Code section 452, subd. (d) of the following court record in support of Defendants’ Motion for Summary Adjudication as against Plaintiffs' Eighth Cause of Action and claim for punitive damages in the Third Amended Complaint: 1. Third Amended Complaint by Plaintiffs Beacon Residential Community Association, filed April 27, 2011, for the instant matter; attached to the accompanying Declaration of David S. Webster in support of Motion as Exhibit "A" for reference. The court records requested to be judicially noticed by this Court are relevant to Defendants’ Motion for Summary Adjudication of Plaintiffs' Eighth Cause of Action and claim for punitive damages in the Third Amended Complaint in that they evidence specific factual allegations and judicial admissions supporting such Motion. The relevance of the court records for which judicial notice is requested is set forth in the Memorandum of Points and Authorities accompanying Defendants' Motion for Summary Adjudication. Code of Civil Procedure section 437c(b)(1) provides that a summary judgment motion can be based on matter of which the court must, or may, take judicial notice. DATED: September 26, 2012 WOOD, SMITH, HENNING & BERMAN LLP By: ‘ ‘ fiat Y Misco Mi lebahe STACEY F. BLANK DAVID S. WEBSTER Attorneys for Defendants, CATELLUS THIRD AND KING LLC; CATELLUS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION; CATELLUS COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT CORP.; CATELLUS OPERATING LIMITED PARTNERSHIP; CATELLUS URBAN DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION; CATELLUS URBAN DEVELOPMENT GROUP LLC; THIRD AND KING INVESTORS LLC; and PROLOGIS LEGAL:05863-0005/2417846.1 2. REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR SUMMARY ADJUDICATION