On August 08, 2008 a
Motion-Secondary
was filed
involving a dispute between
Beacon Residential Community Association,
Catellus Commericial Development Corp.,
Catellus Development Corporation,
Catellus Operating Limited Partnership,
Catellus Residential Construction, Inc.,
Catellus Third And King Investors Llc,
Catellus Third And King Llc,
Catellus Urban Development Corporation,
Catellus Urban Development Group, Llc, A Delaware,
Centurion Real Estate Investors Iv,Llc,
Centurion Real Estate Partners, Llc,
Mission Place Llc,
Mission Place Mezzanine Llc,
Mission Place Mezz Holdings Llc,
Mission Place Partners Llc,
Prologis,
Shooter & Butts, Inc.,
Third And King Investors Llc,
Third And King Investors, Llc, A Delaware Limited,
Thyssenkrupp Elevator Corporation (Erroneously,
Webcor Builders,Inc,
Webcor Construction Inc.,
Webcor Construction, Inc Dba Webcor Builders,
Window Solutions, Inc.,
and
All Defendants See Scanned Documents,
Allied Fire Protection,
Anning-Johnson Company,
Architectural Glass & Aluminum Co., Inc,
Blue'S Roofing Company,
Carefree Toland Pools, Inc.,
Catellus Commerical Development Corporation,
Catellus Commericial Development Corp.,
Catellus Development Corporation,
Catellus Operating Limited Partnership,
Catellus Residential Construction, Inc.,
Catellus Third And King Investors Llc,
Catellus Third And King Llc,
Catellus Urban Development Corporation,
Catellus Urban Development Group, Llc, A Delaware,
Catellus Urban Development, Llc,
Centurion Partners, Llc,
Centurion Real Estate Investors Iv,Llc,
Centurion Real Estate Partners, Llc,
Creative Masonry, Inc,
Critchfield Mechanical, Inc.,
Cupertino Electric,Inc.,
Does 1 Through 200,
Does 52-200, Inclusive,
F. Rodgers Corporation,
F. Rodgers Corporation (Fka F. Rodgers Insulation,
F. Rodgers Insulation Residential, Inc.,
Hks Architects, Inc,
Hks, Inc,
Hks, Inc Individually And Dba Hks Architects, Inc,
J.W. Mcclenahan Co.,
Mission Place Llc,
Mission Place Mezzanine Llc,
Mission Place Mezz Holdings Llc,
Mission Place Partners Llc,
N.V. Heathorn, Inc.,
Poma Corporation,
Prologis,
Roofing Constructors, Inc. Dba Western,
Shooter & Butts, Inc.,
Skidmore Owings & Merrill Llp,
Skimore Owings & Merrill Llp,
Third And King Investors Llc,
Thyssen Krupp Elevator Corporation,
Thyssenkrupp Elevator Corporation (Erroneously,
Thyssenkrupp Elevators Corporation,
Tractel Inc.,
Van-Mulder Sheet Metal, Inc.,
Webcor Builders,Inc,
Webcor Construction Inc.,
Webcor Construction, Inc,
Webcor Construction, Inc Dba Webcor Builders,
Webcor Construction Inc.,Individually And Doing,
Webcor Construction Lp Individually And Dba Webcor,
Webcor Construction Partners Llc,
West Coast Protective Coatings, Inc.,
Western Roofing Service,
Window Solutions, Dba Window Solutions, Inc.,
Window Solutions, Inc.,
for CONSTRUCTION
in the District Court of San Francisco County.
Preview
KATZOVF & RIGGS LLP
ANN RANKIN (SBN 83690)
TERRY WILKENS (SBN 118469)
Law Offices of Ann Rankin
3911 Harrison Street
Oakland, CA 94611
Tel.: (510) 653-8886
Fax: (510) 653-8889
KENNETH 8S. KATZOFF (SBN 103490)
ROBERT R. RIGGS (SBN 107684)
SUNG E. SHIM (SBN 184247)
Katzoff & Riggs LLP
1500 Park Ave #300
Emeryville, CA 94608
Tel: (510) 597-1990
Fax: (510) 597-0295
Attorneys for Plaintiff BEACON
RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITY
ASSOCIATION
ELECTRONICALLY
FILED
Superior Court of California,
County of San Francisco
FEB 15 2013
Clerk of the Court
BY: ANNIE PASCUAL
Deputy Clerk
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
BEACON RESIDENTIAL
COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION,
Plaintiff,
vs.
CATELLUS THIRD AND KING LLC,
etal.,
Defendants.
SS SSS
1
Case No. CGC 08-478453
PLAINTIFF’S FURTHER
OBJECTIONS TO ADDITIONAL
EVIDENCE IN SUPPORT OF
MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY
ADJUDICATION ON SEVENTH
CAUSE OF ACTION
Date: March 29, 2013
Time: 9:00 a.m.
Dept.: 304
Judge: Honorable Curtis E.A. Karnow
Trial Date: TBD
PLAINTIFF’S FURTHER OBJECTIONS TO ADDITIONAL EVIDENCE IN SUPPORT OF MOTIONS
FOR SUMMARY ADJUDICATION ON SEVENTH CAUSE OF ACTIONKATZOVF & RIGGS LLP
22
23
INTRODUCTION
Plaintiff Beacon Residential Community Association (“Plaintiff”) objects to the
entirety of the Declaration of Mark Bledsoe in Support of Defendants and Cross-
Defendants Cupertino Electric, Inc., Creative Masonry, Inc., Carefree Toland Pools, Inc.,
J.W. McClenahan, Inc., Van Mulder Sheet Metal, Inc., N.V. Heathorn, Inc., Critchfield
Mechanical, Inc., Blue’s Roofing Company, West Coast Protective Coatings, Allied Fire
Protection, and Western Roofing Service’s (“the Subcontractors”) Motion for Summary
Adjudication Against Plaintiff Beacon Residential Community Association’s Seventh
Cause of Action for Third Party Beneficiary/Breach of Contracts and Subcontracts
Alleged in Plaintiff's Third Amended Complaint (“the Bledsoe Declaration”).
OBJECTION
A. The Bledsoe Declaration Filed and Served on February 8, 2013 Is Untimely
and Should Not be Considered
In a motion for summary adjudication the moving party is required to set forth the
material evidence with its moving papers. (San Diego Watercrafts, Inc. v. Wells Fargo
Bank, N.A. (2008) 103 Cal.App.4" 308, 316.) As the remedy of summary judgment or
adjudication is drastic, due process requires a party be fully advised of the issues to be
addressed and be given adequate notice of what facts it must rebut in order to prevail.
(Carabini v. Superior Court (1994) 26 Cal. App. 4th 239, 244.)
Subcontractors did not serve the Bledsoe Declaration until February 8, 2013, well
after this motion had been fully briefed. Plaintiff objects to the entirety of the Bledsoe
Declaration on these grounds. Under these rules the Court should not consider the
Bledsoe Declaration.
Plaintiff further objects to the Bledsoe Declaration on the grounds that the facts
contained therein are not referenced anywhere in Subcontractors’ Separate Statement of
Undisputed Material Facts in Support of Their Motion for Summary Adjudication, filed
2
PLAINTIFF’S FURTHER OBJECTIONS TO ADDITIONAL EVIDENCE IN SUPPORT OF MOTIONS
FOR SUMMARY ADJUDICATION ON SEVENTH CAUSE OF ACTIONKATZOVF & RIGGS LLP
22
23
herein on November 20, 2012 (“the Subcontractor Separate Statement”). As such, the
belated filing of the Bledsoe Declaration violates the “Golden Rule” of summary
judgment and adjudication motions that:
“Sf it is not set forth in the separate statement, it does not exist. Both the
court and the opposing party are entitled to have all the facts upon which
the moving party bases its motion plainly set forth in the separate
statement.””
(United Community Church vy. Garcin (1991) 231 Cal. App. 3d 327, 337.)
Plaintiff further objects to the entirety of the Bledsoe Declaration on the grounds
that it is not referenced in Subcontractors’ Separate Statement. Under the “Golden Rule”
of summary adjudication motions the Court should not consider the Bledsoe Declaration.
Plaintiff also objects on the grounds that the Subcontractors filed the Bledsoe
Declaration in violation of an express order of the Court. At the hearing on this motion
on January 25, 2013, after the Court stated its intention to continue the hearing to March
29, 2013, the Court clearly and explicitly rejected the request of Subcontractors’ counsel
that the Court permit the Subcontractors to file additional papers in support of this
motion. If the Court permits the Subcontractors to file the Bledsoe Declaration, or any
other additional papers, Plaintiff would need to be allowed leave to address them through
a further supplemental memorandum in order to avoid severe prejudice.
CONCLUSION
For the foregoing reasons the Court should sustain Plaintiff's objections to the
entirety of the Bledsoe Declaration,
* Plaintiff, as a matter of professional courtesy and to assist with the management of this
litigation, permitted the Subcontractors to file the instant motion despite the fact that they
had exceeded the deadline for the filing this motion.
3
PLAINTIFF’S FURTHER OBJECTIONS TO ADDITIONAL EVIDENCE IN SUPPORT OF MOTIONS
FOR SUMMARY ADJUDICATION ON SEVENTH CAUSE OF ACTION1 Dated: February 14, 2013
2 LAW OFFICES OF ANN RANKIN
KATZOFF & RIGGS LLP
3
4 /s/ Robert R. Riggs
By:
5 Robert R. Riggs
6 Attorneys for BEACON RESIDENTIAL
COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION
7
8
9
a3
g
gS
&
3
&
$
5
a
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23 4
PLAINTIFF’S FURTHER OBJECTIONS TO ADDITIONAL EVIDENCE IN SUPPORT OF MOTIONS
FOR SUMMARY ADJUDICATION ON SEVENTH CAUSE OF ACTIONKATZOFF & RIGGS LLP
1500 PARK AVENUE, SUITE 300
EMERYVILLE, CA 94608
(51m) 597-1990
PROOF OF SERVICE
I, the undersigned, declare that I am over the age of 18 and am not a party to this
action. I am employed in the City of Oakland, County of Alameda, California; my
business address is 1500 Park Avenue, Suite 300, Emeryville, California 94608.
On the below date I served the attached document(s) entitled:
PLAINTIFF’S FURTHER OBJECTIONS TO ADDITIONAL EVIDENCE IN
SUPPORT OF MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY ADJUDICATION ON SEVENTH
CAUSE OF ACTION
as follows: (SERVICE LIST ATTACHED)
(BY MAIL) I caused such envelope to be deposited in the mail at Emeryville,
ifornia, The envelope was mailed with postage thereon fully prepaid.
(BY MAIL) | am readily familiar with the firm's practice of collection and processing
of correspondence for mailing. It is deposited with the U.S. Postal Service on the same
day in the ordinary course of business. [ am aware that on motion of party served, service
is presumed invalid if postal cancellation date on postage meter is more than 1 day after
date of deposit for mailing in affidavit.
___. (BY HAND) I caused each such document to be delivered by hand to the attorney(s)
noted above.
__ (BY FAX) I caused a true copy to be transmitted via facsimile to the addressee(s)
noted above at the FAX number noted after party's address.
_X. (BY EMAIL AND BY LEXIS E-FILING SERVICE) I caused a true copy to be
Transmitted via email to the attorneys on the attached service list and then causing a true
copy to be delivered via Lexis’ E-Filing Service.
I declare under penalty of periury under the laws of the State of California that the
foregoing is true and correct. This declaration is executed in Emeryville, California on
February 15, 2013 SR
Sung E. Shim
5
PLAINTIFF’S FURTHER OBJECTIONS TO ADDITIONAL EVIDENCE IN SUPPORT OF MOTIONS
FOR SUMMARY ADJUDICATION ON SEVENTH CAUSE OF ACTION1 SERVICE LIST
2 Beacon Residential Community Association vy. Catellus Third and King LLC, et al.,
San Francisco County Superior Court Case No. CGC 08-478453
3
4 .
Ann Rankin Randel Campbell
5 Terry Wilkens Lynch, Gilardi & Grummer
Law Offices of Ann Rankin 170 Columbus Avenue, 5th Floor
3911 Harrison Street San Francisco, CA 94133
6 Oakland, CA 94611 Phone: (415) 397-2800
Phone: (510) 653-8886 Fax: (415) 397-0937
7 Fax: (510) 653-8889 reampbell@lgglaw.com
arankin@annrankin.com
8 twilkens(@annrankin.com Counsel for Architectural Glass and Aluminum
Co., Ine.
9 Co-Counsel for Plaintiff Beacon
Residential Community Association
Steven M. Cvitanovie Charles A. Hansen, Esq.
Haight Brown & Bonesteel LLP Peter J. Laufenberg, Esq.
71 Stevenson Street, 20" Floor Gregory K. Jung, Esq.
San Francisco, CA 94105 Wendel, Rosen, Black & Dean, LLP
1111 Broadway, 24" Floor
Phone: (415) 546-7500 Oakland CA 94607
Fax: (415) 546-7505
sevitanovic@hbblaw.com one: (510) 834-6600
ax: (510) 834-1928
Co-Counsel for Defendants Mission Place | chansen@wende!,com,
15 LLC; Mission Place Mess Holding LLC; plaufenberg@wendel.com
Mission Place Mezzanine LLC; Mission giung@wendel.com
16 Place Partners LLC; Centurion Real Estate
au
Investors IV, LLC; and Centurion Real Co-Counsel for Defendants Mission Place LLC;
17 Estate Partners, LLC; Centurion Partners | Mission Place Mess Holding LLC; Mission
LLCO Place Mezzanine LLC, Mission Place Parmers
18 LLC; Centurion Real Estate Investors LV, LLC;
and Centurion Real Estate Partners, LLC;
Centurion Partners LLC)
22
23 6
PLAINTIFF’S FURTHER OBJECTIONS TO ADDITIONAL EVIDENCE IN SUPPORT OF MOTIONS
FOR SUMMARY ADJUDICATION ON SEVENTH CAUSE OF ACTION22
23
David S. Webster, Esq.
Mark J. D’Argenio
Wood, Smith, Henning & Berman, LLP
1401 Willow Pass Road, Suite 700
Concord, CA 94520
Phone: (925) 222-3400
Fax: (925) 356-8250
dwebster@wshblaw.com,
mdargenio@wshblaw.com
Counsel for Catellus Development
Corporation; Catellus Commercial
Development Corporation; Catellus Urban
Development Corporation; Catellus
Operating Limited Partnership; Catellus
Urban Development Group, LLC, Catellus
Third and King LLC; and Third and King
Investors, LLC; ProLogis
John A. Koeppel, Esq.
Todd J. Wenzel, Esq.
Ropers, Majeski, Kohn & Bentley
201 Spear Street, 10" Floor
San Francisco, CA 94105
Phone: (415) 543-4800
Fax: (415) 972-6301
jkoeppel@ropers.com,
twenzel@ropers.com
Counsel for Catellus Development Corporation;
Catellus Commercial Development Corporation;
Catellus Urban Development Corporation; Catellus
Operating Limited Partnership; Catellus Urban
Development Group, LLC; Catellus Third and King
LLC; and Third and King Investors, LLC; ProLogis
Steven H. Schwartz
Noel E. Macaulay
Schwartz & Janzen, LLP
12100 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 1125
Los Angeles. CA 90025
Phone: (310) 979-4090
Fax: (310) 207-3344
sschwartz@sj-law.com
nmacaulay(@sj-law.com
Counsel for HKS, Inc., individually and dba
HKS Architects, Ine.
Kevin P. McCarthy
McCarthy & McCarthy
The Arlington Building
492 Ninth Street, Suite 220
Oakland, CA 94607
Phone: (510) 839-8100
Fax: (510) 839-8108
kmecarthy@mecarthylip.com
Counsel for Cross-Defendant Window Solutions,
Ine.
8. Mitchell Kaplan
Gregory Hanson.
Gordon & Rees LLP
275 Battery Street, Suite 2000
San Francisco, CA 94111
Phone: (415) 986-5900
Fax: (415) 986-8054
skaplan@gordonrees.com
ghanson@gordonrees.com
Counsel for Webcor Construction, Inc. dba
Samuel Muir
Erin Dunker
Collins Collins Muir + Stewart LLP
1100 El Centro Street
South Pasadena, CA 91030
Phone: (626) 243-1100
Fax: (626) 243-1111
smuir@cemslaw.com
edunkerly@ccmslaw.com
Co-Counsel for Webcor Construction, Inc. dba
Webcor Builders; Webcor Builders, Inc.; Webcor
7
PLAINTIFF’S FURTHER OBJECTIONS TO ADDITIONAL EVIDENCE IN SUPPORT OF MOTIONS
FOR SUMMARY ADJUDICATION ON SEVENTH CAUSE OF ACTION22
23
Webcor Builders; Webcor Builders, Inc.;
Webcor Construction LP.
Construction LP
William H. Staples
Dana Duncan
Archer Norris
2033 North Main Street, Suite 800
Walnut Creek, CA94596
Phone: (925) 930-6600
Fax: (925) 930-6620
wstaples@archernorris.com
dduncan@archernorris.com
Counsel for Anning-Johnson Company
Scott A. Reinstein
Steven McDonald
Bledsoe, Catheart, Diestel, Pederson & Treppa, LLP
601 California Street, 16th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94108
Phone: (415) 981-5411
Fax: (415) 981-0352
smedonald@bledsoelaw.com
sreinstein@bledsoelaw.com
Counsel for Shooter & Butts, Inc.
Adam Brezine
Julien E. Capers
Bryan Cave, LLP
560 Mission Street, 25th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94105
Phone: (415) 268-2000
Fax: (415) 268-1999
adam. brezine@bryancave.com
julien.capers@bryancave.com
Counsel for Solutia, Inc.
Christopher Olsen
Clinton & Clinton
100 Oceangate, [4th Floor
Long Beach, CA 90802
Phone: (562) 216-5000
Fax: (562) 216-5001
colsen@clinton-clinton.com
scloud@clinton-clinton.com
Counsel for Thyssenkrupp Elevator Corporation
Christian P. Lucia
Denae Olivieri
Brent Basilico
Sellar Hazard Manning Ficenec & Lucia
1800 Sutter Street, Suite 460
Concord, CA 94520
Phone: (925) 938-1430
Fax: (925) 256-7508
clucia@sellerlaw.com
dolivieri@sellarlaw.com
Bbasilico@sellarlaw.com
Counsel for Cupertino Electric, Ine.;
Creatvie Masonry, Inc.; Carefree Toland
Pools, Inc.; JW. McClenahan, Inc.; N.V.
Heathorn, Inc.; Critchfield Mechanical,
Inc.; West Coast Protective Coating, Inc.;
Blue’s Roofing Company, Van-Mulder
8
PLAINTIFF’S FURTHER OBJECTIONS TO ADDITIONAL EVIDENCE IN SUPPORT OF MOTIONS
FOR SUMMARY ADJUDICATION ON SEVENTH CAUSE OF ACTION22
23
Sheet Metal, Inc., F. Rogers Corporation;
Roofing Constructors, Inc., dha Western
Roofing Service; Allied Fire Protection
9
PLAINTIFF’S FURTHER OBJECTIONS TO ADDITIONAL EVIDENCE IN SUPPORT OF MOTIONS
FOR SUMMARY ADJUDICATION ON SEVENTH CAUSE OF ACTION