On June 05, 2012 a
Order
was filed
involving a dispute between
Marshall, Alex,
Marshall, Nathan,
and
Behbahani, Faegh,
Desoto Cab Company, Inc.,
Does 1 To 20, Incl.,
Does 3-20,
Selby And Hudson Corporation,
for civil
in the District Court of San Francisco County.
Preview
OOO
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
Document Scanning Lead Sheet
Dec-19-2013 10:36 am
Case Number: CGC-12-521356
Filing Date: Dec-19-2013 10:35
Filed by: KAREN LIU
Juke Box: 001 Image: 04314940
ORDER
—I
NATHAN MARSHALL et al VS. DESOTO CAB COMPANY, INC. et al
001004314940
Instructions:
Please place this sheet on top of the document to be scanned.So Oe ND HW BF BW NY
N NY YN YN NY NR NY NY HB Be Be ewe ewe eB eB Be ew
on DA FB YH = SO we RA Dw BF WN
WILLIAM J. FRIMEL (Bar No. 160287)
bill@hsfllp.com
Heffernan Seubert & French LLP
1075 Curtis Street
Menlo Park, CA 94025
Tel: 650.322.3048
Fax: 650.322.2976
Attorneys for Defendant
SELBY AND HUDSON CORPORATION
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
NATHAN MARSHALL and ALEX Case No. CGC-12-521356
MARSHALL, individually and as
successors in interest to decedents [ |] ORDER SUSTAINING
DENNIS T. MARSHALL and KAREN EFENDANT SELBY AND HUDSON
MARSHALL, CORPORATION’S DEMURRER TO
PLAINTIFFS’ FIRST AMENDED
Plaintiffs, COMPLAINT
Vv.
Date: December 4, 2013
DESOTO CAB COMPANY, INC., Time: 9:30 a.m.
FAEGH BEHBAHANI, SELBY AND Dept.: 302
HUDSON CORPORATION, and DOES 1- Judge: Hon. Marla J. Miller
20, inclusive,
Defendants.
[PROPOSED] ORDER SUSTAINING DEFENDANT’S DEMURRER TO COMPLAINTPROPOSED] ORDER
Defendant Selby and Hudson Corporation’s (“Selby & Hudson”) demurrer to Plaintiffs
Nathan Marshall’s and Alex Marshall’s First Amended Complaint (the “FAC”) in the above-
referenced matter came on regularly for a hearing on December 4, 2013, at 9:30 a.m., in
Department 302 of the Superior Court of the State of California for the County of San Francisco.
Good cause appearing, the Court orders as follows:
| Selby & Hudson’s demurrer is sustained with 10 days’ leave to amend. No substantive
opposition was filed. Plaintiffs have leave to file a Second Amended Complaint.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: Water. 1& 2013
Walk
JUDGE OF THE SUPERIOR COURT
SEEEXHIBIT‘A'RE
| “liNCE WITH CRC 3.1312
2-
| [PROPOSED] ORDER SUSTAINING DEFENDANT’S DEMURRER TO COMPLAINT12N6N3 . Stanford Alumni Mail - Marshall v. DeSoto Cab Co. - Proposed Order
To: Christopher Edgar
Cc: Bill Frimel
Confirmed.
From: cedgar@alumni.stanford.edu [mailto:cedgar@alumni.stanford.edu] On Behalf Of Christopher Edgar
Sent: Monday, December 16, 2013 4:17 PM
To: Miles Cooper
Cc: Bill Frimel
Subject: Marshall v. DeSoto Cab Co. - Proposed Order
Miles -- the clerk asked that we get your approval as to form of the attached proposed order, which is identical to
the tentative ruling. Can you confirm that you approve it as to form?
Thanks, Chris
https:/imail.g 00g !e.com/mail/W0/?ui= 28ik= 153cf49c698view= pt&sear ch=inbox&msg=142fded8bed1646a
4Page 1 of 1
Lesley Fiscella
From: cedgar@alumni.stanford.edu on behalf of Christopher Edgar [cedgar@stanfordalumni.org]
Sent: Monday, December 16, 2013 5:17 PM
To: Contestdept302tr
Ce: Miles Cooper; phil@kndslaw.com; Bill Frimel
Subject: Re: Case No. CGC-12-521356 - proposed order regarding demurrer
Attachments: Selby - proposed demurrer order.doc; E-mail from Plantiffs' counsel confirming approval.pdf
Per the Court's request, I write on behalf of Defendant Selby and Hudson Corporation to confirm that counsel for
Plaintiffs Nathan and Alex Marshall has approved the proposed order submitted below as to form. I have re-attached
the proposed order submitted below, along with an e-mail from Plaintiffs' counsel confirming his approval of the
order as to form.
As stated below, the proposed order relates to the matter captioned Marshall v. DeSoto Cab Co., Case No. CGC-12-
521356, and to Selby and Hudson's demurrer to Plaintiffs' First Amended Complaint, which was heard on December
4, 2013.
Regards,
Chris Edgar
On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 11:42 AM, Christopher Edgar wrote:
To whom it may concern,
On behalf of Defendant Selby and Hudson Corporation in the matter captioned Marshall v. DeSoto Cab Co., Case
No. CGC-12-521356, attached please find a proposed order regarding Selby and Hudson's demurrer to Plaintiffs’
First Amended Complaint, which was heard on December 4, 2013.
Regards,
Chris Edgar
12/17/2013
Document Filed Date
December 19, 2013
Case Filing Date
June 05, 2012
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Preview
OOO SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO Document Scanning Lead Sheet Dec-19-2013 10:36 am Case Number: CGC-12-521356 Filing Date: Dec-19-2013 10:35 Filed by: KAREN LIU Juke Box: 001 Image: 04314940 ORDER —I NATHAN MARSHALL et al VS. DESOTO CAB COMPANY, INC. et al 001004314940 Instructions: Please place this sheet on top of the document to be scanned.So Oe ND HW BF BW NY N NY YN YN NY NR NY NY HB Be Be ewe ewe eB eB Be ew on DA FB YH = SO we RA Dw BF WN WILLIAM J. FRIMEL (Bar No. 160287) bill@hsfllp.com Heffernan Seubert & French LLP 1075 Curtis Street Menlo Park, CA 94025 Tel: 650.322.3048 Fax: 650.322.2976 Attorneys for Defendant SELBY AND HUDSON CORPORATION SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO NATHAN MARSHALL and ALEX Case No. CGC-12-521356 MARSHALL, individually and as successors in interest to decedents [ |] ORDER SUSTAINING DENNIS T. MARSHALL and KAREN EFENDANT SELBY AND HUDSON MARSHALL, CORPORATION’S DEMURRER TO PLAINTIFFS’ FIRST AMENDED Plaintiffs, COMPLAINT Vv. Date: December 4, 2013 DESOTO CAB COMPANY, INC., Time: 9:30 a.m. FAEGH BEHBAHANI, SELBY AND Dept.: 302 HUDSON CORPORATION, and DOES 1- Judge: Hon. Marla J. Miller 20, inclusive, Defendants. [PROPOSED] ORDER SUSTAINING DEFENDANT’S DEMURRER TO COMPLAINTPROPOSED] ORDER Defendant Selby and Hudson Corporation’s (“Selby & Hudson”) demurrer to Plaintiffs Nathan Marshall’s and Alex Marshall’s First Amended Complaint (the “FAC”) in the above- referenced matter came on regularly for a hearing on December 4, 2013, at 9:30 a.m., in Department 302 of the Superior Court of the State of California for the County of San Francisco. Good cause appearing, the Court orders as follows: | Selby & Hudson’s demurrer is sustained with 10 days’ leave to amend. No substantive opposition was filed. Plaintiffs have leave to file a Second Amended Complaint. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: Water. 1& 2013 Walk JUDGE OF THE SUPERIOR COURT SEEEXHIBIT‘A'RE | “liNCE WITH CRC 3.1312 2- | [PROPOSED] ORDER SUSTAINING DEFENDANT’S DEMURRER TO COMPLAINT12N6N3 . Stanford Alumni Mail - Marshall v. DeSoto Cab Co. - Proposed Order To: Christopher Edgar Cc: Bill Frimel Confirmed. From: cedgar@alumni.stanford.edu [mailto:cedgar@alumni.stanford.edu] On Behalf Of Christopher Edgar Sent: Monday, December 16, 2013 4:17 PM To: Miles Cooper Cc: Bill Frimel Subject: Marshall v. DeSoto Cab Co. - Proposed Order Miles -- the clerk asked that we get your approval as to form of the attached proposed order, which is identical to the tentative ruling. Can you confirm that you approve it as to form? Thanks, Chris https:/imail.g 00g !e.com/mail/W0/?ui= 28ik= 153cf49c698view= pt&sear ch=inbox&msg=142fded8bed1646a 4Page 1 of 1 Lesley Fiscella From: cedgar@alumni.stanford.edu on behalf of Christopher Edgar [cedgar@stanfordalumni.org] Sent: Monday, December 16, 2013 5:17 PM To: Contestdept302tr Ce: Miles Cooper; phil@kndslaw.com; Bill Frimel Subject: Re: Case No. CGC-12-521356 - proposed order regarding demurrer Attachments: Selby - proposed demurrer order.doc; E-mail from Plantiffs' counsel confirming approval.pdf Per the Court's request, I write on behalf of Defendant Selby and Hudson Corporation to confirm that counsel for Plaintiffs Nathan and Alex Marshall has approved the proposed order submitted below as to form. I have re-attached the proposed order submitted below, along with an e-mail from Plaintiffs' counsel confirming his approval of the order as to form. As stated below, the proposed order relates to the matter captioned Marshall v. DeSoto Cab Co., Case No. CGC-12- 521356, and to Selby and Hudson's demurrer to Plaintiffs' First Amended Complaint, which was heard on December 4, 2013. Regards, Chris Edgar On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 11:42 AM, Christopher Edgar wrote: To whom it may concern, On behalf of Defendant Selby and Hudson Corporation in the matter captioned Marshall v. DeSoto Cab Co., Case No. CGC-12-521356, attached please find a proposed order regarding Selby and Hudson's demurrer to Plaintiffs’ First Amended Complaint, which was heard on December 4, 2013. Regards, Chris Edgar 12/17/2013