Party Notice: T'JADE JACKSON VS. CITY AND C0UNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO et al

• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 

						
                                
Preview
                                DUA

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO

Document Scanning Lead Sheet
May-07-2013 2:49 pm

Case Number: CGC-12-520772
Filing Date: May-06-2013 2:48
Filed by: MAURA RAMIREZ
Juke Box: 001 Image: 04046368
NOTICE OF UNAVAILABILITY

T'JADE JACKSON VS. CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO et al

001004046368

Instructions:
Please place this sheet on top of the document to be scanned.oon Ook WY A=

NH MO NY NY NY NY NY NY NY |S B= Ba Ba sas ws Ba Ba Aa a
on oak OW NY = OD OH AN DODO FF WHY BA OO

SANFORD M. CIPINKO, SBN 88102
YULIYA MAGOMEDOV, SBN 251964

LAW OFFICES OF SANFORD M. CIPINKO San Francisco County Superior Cou!
55 Francisco Street, Suite 403 _

San Francisco, CA 94133 MAY — 6 2013
Telephone: (415) 693-9905 CLERK OF THE COURT
Facsimile: (415) 693-9904 BY! Dees Cat g :
Attorneys for Plaintiff

T'ADE JACKSON

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO

T'JADE JACKSON Case No.: CGC-12-520772
Plaintiff,

NOTICE OF UNAVAILABILITY OF

V PLAINTIFF’S COUNSEL

DAVID EBARLE and DOES 1-50,

Defendants.

TO THE COURT. AND TO ALL PARTIES AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF|
RECORD:

NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that during the period July 4, 2013 through July 23,
2013 plaintiff's counsel will be unavailable for any purpose including, but not limited to,
receiving notices of any kind requiring time sensitive responses, responding to ex parte
applications, court appearances, depositions, law and motion hearings and/or any othe

nature.

1

NOTICE OF UNAVAILABILITY OF PLAINTIFF'S COUNSELo ON OD HO FF WN =

NN NY NY NY NY NY YM NY SB Ba as so we wo ow oa ow a
aon oar OH BA OO DAN DO BRB wWDNY = CO

Knowingly and willfully scheduling a conflicting appearance or requiring a time
sensitive response during this period of unavailability without good cause or necessity may
constitute sanctionable conduct. (See Tenderloin Housing Clinic v. Sparks (1992) 8
Cal.App.4th 299).

Dated: May 2, 2013 THE LAW OFFICES OF SANFORD M. CIPINKO

— /

Attorney for Plaintiff
T'JADE JACKSON

2

NOTICE OF UNAVAILABILITY OF PLAINTIFF'S COUNSELoOo ont Oa FF WO NY =

10

PROOF OF SERVICE

| am a resident of the State of California, over the age of 18 years and not a party to action
named herein. My business address is Law Offices of Sanford M. Cipinko, 55 Francisco
Street, Suite 403, San Francisco, California 94133. On the date set forth below, | caused
the parties listed below to be served in the manner indicated at the addresses set forth
below, with the following documents:

NOTICE OF UNAVAILABILITY OF PLAINTIFF’S COUNSEL

Facsimile: By transmitting via facsimile the document(s) listed above to the
facsimile numbers set forth below on this date before 5:00 p.m.

x U.S. Postal Service: By placing the document(s) listed above a sealed envelope
with postage prepaid and putting same in a United States mailbox located at San
Francisco, California the same day.

Hand Delivery: By private messenger service this business day.
By Personal Service: By personal delivery this business day.
By Overnight Express Delivery Service.

ADDRESSES:

Steven C. Toschi, Esq.

Toschi, Sidran, Collins & Doyle
100 Webster Street. Suite 300
San Francisco, CA 94607

Marilou R. Bustonera, Esq.

Law offices of Gilsleider & McMahon
2300 Clayton Road, Suite 430,
Concord, CA 94520

David Ammons, Esq.

City Attorney's Office

1390 Marker Street, Sixth Floor
San Francisco, CA 94102

| declare on penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California shat the
foregoing statements are true and correct.

DATED: May 2, 2013

3

NOTICE OF UNAVAILABILITY OF PLAINTIFF'S COUNSEL