On December 29, 2008 a
Party Discovery
was filed
involving a dispute between
Beneficial California Inc A Delaware Corporation,
and
Calvoperez, Jose,
Does 1 To 10, Both Inclusive,
for EXEMPT COLLECTIONS (RULE 3.740)
in the District Court of San Francisco County.
Preview
MOO
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
Document Scanning Lead Sheet
Apr-14-2009 2:32 pm
Case Number: CGC-08-483566
Filing Date: Apr-14-2009 12:37
Juke Box: 001 Image: 02465086
DEFAULT COURT JUDGMENT - GENERAL
BENEFICIAL CALIFORNIA INC A DELAWARE CORPORATION VS. JOSE CALVOPEREZ
001002465086
Instructions:
Please place this sheet on top of the document to be scanned.~
JUD-100
[ATIORNEY OR PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY (Name, ster. number, and adsress):
|_ KAREN M. PARIS SBN: 120075
PARIS LAW BUILDING
424 PICO BLVD
SANTA MONICA, CA 90405
TELEPHONE wo.: (310)-392-8722 FAX NO. (Optiona: 310-392-1768
E-MAIL ADDRESS (Optional):
ATTORNEY FOR (Neme: BENEFICIAL CALIFORNIA INC
‘SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
STREET ADDRESS: 400 McALLISTER STREET, RM 103
MAILING ADDRESS:
ery ann ZIP CODE: SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94102
BRANCH NAME: CIVIC CENTER COURTHOUSE
FOR COURT USE ONLY
PLAINTIFF: BENEFICIAL CALIFORNIA INC
DEFENDANT: JOSE CALVOPEREZ
“7 CASE NUMBER:
JUDGMENT
O syclerk & ByDefault (After Court Trial CGC08483566
By Court [] On Stipulation C1 __ Defendant Did Not
Appear at Trial
JUDGMENT
1.& BY DEFAULT
a. Defendant was properly served with a copy of the summons and complaint.
. Defendant failed to answer the complaint or appear and defend the action within the time allowed by law.
b.
¢. Defendant's default was entered by the clerk upon plaintiff's application.
d.
Clerk’s Judgment (Code Civ. Proc., § 585(a)). Defendant was sued only on a contract or judgment of a court of
this state for the recovery of money.
. Court Judgment (Code Civ. Proc., § 585(b)). The court considered
(1) (1 plaintitfs testimony and other evidence.
(2) EX plaintiff's written declaration (Code Civ. Proc., § 585(d)).
9
ON STIPULATION
IMAGED
IAPR 1.4 2009
a. Plaintiff and defendant agreed (stipulated) that a judgment be entered in this case. The court approved the stipulated
judgment and
b. [ the signed written stipulation was filed in the case,
c. CL) the stipulation was stated in open court Othe stipulation was stated on the record,
AFTER COURT TRIAL. The jury was waived. The court considered the evidence.
a. The case was tried on (date and time):
before (name of judicial officer):
b, Appearances by:
(1 Plaintiff (name each):
(1)
(2)
Continued on Attachment 3b.
[Defendant (name each): Oo
(1)
(2)
1 Continued on Attachment 3b.
Plaintiff's attomey (name each):
(1)
(2)
Defendant's attorney (name each):
(1)
(2)
c. [] Defendant did not appear at trial. Defendant was properly served with notice of trial.
d. A statement of decision (Code Civ. Proc., § 632) Cs was not © was requested.
Page tof 2
Form Approved for Ontional Use
Judicial Council of California JUD- a, JUDGMENT
“100 [New January 1, 2002] \
— Code of Civil Procedure, §§ 585, 664.6
2002 © American LegalNet, Inc.PLAINTIFF: BENEFICIAL CALIFOR, «A INC
CASE NUMBER:
DEFENDANT: JOSE CALVOPEREZ Cacosss3566
JUDGMENT IS ENTERED AS FOLLOWS BY: THE COURT [] THE CLERK
40) Stipulated Judgment. Judgment is entered according to the stipulation of the parties.
5. Parties. Judgment is
a. Xl _ for plaintiff (name each):
BENEFICIAL CALIFORNIA ING, , a Delaware Corporation
and against defendant (names):
JOSE CALVOPEREZ AKA JOSE L. CALVOPEREZ ;
(4 Continued on Attachment 5a.
b. [] for defendant (name each):
c¢, [1 forcross-compiainant (name each):
and against cross-defendant (name each):
(1 Continued on Attachment 5c.
a. 1 for cross-defendant (name each):
6. Amount.
a. J Defendant named in item 5a above must ¢. [] Cross-defendant named in item 5c above must pay
pay plaintiff on the complaint: cross-complainant on the cross-complaint:
Principal of $3,994.31 plus unpaid fimance charge pf 5630.92 «)
“
(1) & Damages 8 4,625.23 2 O Damages s
(2) & — Prejudgment $ 162.54 . | 2) Prejudgm 8
interest at the interest at the
annual rate of 910.00 % annual rate of %
8) [1 attomey fees $
(3). KI Attorney fees 8 720.00). « Ol costs ¥ $
(4) BR Costs $ 311.60] .
(5) C1. Other (Accrued interest): $ of (5) LE Other (specify): $
6) TOTAL $ 5,819.39, | @) TOTAL $
5. [Plaintiff to receive nothing from defendant 4. [] — Cross-compiainant to receive nothing from
named in item 5b.
Defendant named in item 5b to recover Cross-defendant named
costs $ costs $
sana attorney fees $ and attorney fees
7, C1 other (specify):
JAMES J. McBRIDE
APR 14 2009
Date:
cross-defendant named in item 5d.
in item 5d to recover
| certify that this is a true copy of the ‘ariginal judgment on file in the court.
Date:
Clerk, by
, Deputy
Page 2 of 2
UD-100 [New January 1, 2002]
JUDGMENT
2002 © American LegalNet, Inc.
Document Filed Date
April 14, 2009
Case Filing Date
December 29, 2008
Category
EXEMPT COLLECTIONS (RULE 3.740)
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.