arrow left
arrow right
  • IDA CHRISTINA FUA CRUZ VS. JOEL ENRIQUE ANDINO SANCHEZ et al PERSONAL INJURY/PROPERTY DAMAGE - VEHICLE RELATED document preview
  • IDA CHRISTINA FUA CRUZ VS. JOEL ENRIQUE ANDINO SANCHEZ et al PERSONAL INJURY/PROPERTY DAMAGE - VEHICLE RELATED document preview
  • IDA CHRISTINA FUA CRUZ VS. JOEL ENRIQUE ANDINO SANCHEZ et al PERSONAL INJURY/PROPERTY DAMAGE - VEHICLE RELATED document preview
  • IDA CHRISTINA FUA CRUZ VS. JOEL ENRIQUE ANDINO SANCHEZ et al PERSONAL INJURY/PROPERTY DAMAGE - VEHICLE RELATED document preview
  • IDA CHRISTINA FUA CRUZ VS. JOEL ENRIQUE ANDINO SANCHEZ et al PERSONAL INJURY/PROPERTY DAMAGE - VEHICLE RELATED document preview
  • IDA CHRISTINA FUA CRUZ VS. JOEL ENRIQUE ANDINO SANCHEZ et al PERSONAL INJURY/PROPERTY DAMAGE - VEHICLE RELATED document preview
  • IDA CHRISTINA FUA CRUZ VS. JOEL ENRIQUE ANDINO SANCHEZ et al PERSONAL INJURY/PROPERTY DAMAGE - VEHICLE RELATED document preview
  • IDA CHRISTINA FUA CRUZ VS. JOEL ENRIQUE ANDINO SANCHEZ et al PERSONAL INJURY/PROPERTY DAMAGE - VEHICLE RELATED document preview
						
                                

Preview

_ NIU Dn nA BB wW WV Se em BO A BR wD ON D. Douglas Shureen, SBN 124613 McMILLAN & SHUREEN LLP ELECTRONICALLY 50 Santa Rosa Avenue, Suite 200 FILED Care sae eAoD 95404 Superior Court of California, ! ‘ounty of San Francisco ro} 576-7955 (Fax) MAR 05 2015 Attorneys for Defendant/Cross-Complainant Clerk of the Court JOEL ENRIQUE ANDINO SANCHEZ Oe eee Ooo . Deputy Clerk SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO CASE No. CGC-11-515542 (Lead Case) Consolidated with Case Nos. CGC-12-519794 and CGC-13-529705 IDA CRISTINA CRUZ FUA, } , ) vs. MOTION IN LIMINE #4: MOTION IN LIMINE TO EXCLUDE WITNESSES JOEL ENRIQUE ANDINO SANCHEZ, an ) FROM COURTROOM EXCEPT individual, et al., j EXPERTS Defendants. Date: March 9, 2015 Time: 9:30 a.m. Dept.: 206 Action filed: 10/31/11 AND RELATED CROSS-ACTIONS. Defendant/Cross-Complainant JOEL ENRIQUE ANDINO SANCHEZ, before trial and the election of a jury, hereby moves for an order in limine to exclude all witnesses from the courtroom except for expert witnesses and parties. Defendant specifically requests that the court allow experts to be present in the courtroom to listen to the testimony of expert witnesses in their field and to the testimony of fact witnesses relevant to the basis for their opinions. Under Evidence Code § 777, the trial court is given broad discretion to determine whether a witness or witnesses should be excluded from the courtroom, so that such witness or witnesses cannot hear the testimony of other witnesses. The court will not abuse its discretion in allowing defendants’ expert witnesses to be in the courtroom while plaintiff s expert witnesses aid percipient witnesses are testifying. Since the experts are 1 MOTION IN LIMINE #4: MOTION IN LIMINE TO EXCLUDE WITNESSES FROM COURTROOM EXCEPT EXPERTSoD OD mw IND HW BBW Ce aU A A BR BD NN MY NY NY NY NN oe a A A RF BW NH & S testifying as to their opinions, it is highly desirable that they should hear each other's testimony to allow them to be able to understand and respond to the other expert's opinions if necessary. DATED: March ~*~ 2015 McMILLAN & SHUREEN Lip oy QL 2 D. Douglas Shureen Attorneys for Defendant/Cross- Complainant JOEL ENRIQUE ANDINO SANCHEZ MOTION IN LIMINE #4: MOTION IN LIMINE TO EXCLUDE WITNESSES FROM COURTROOM EXCEPT EXPERTSoO 0 Om UN DW BW Ne 12 FUA v. SANCHEZ, et al. SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT CASE No. CGC-11-515542 (Lead Case) Consolidated with Case Nos, CGC-12-519794 and CGC-13-529705 PROOF OF SERVICE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF SONOMA | am employed in the County of Sonoma, State of California. | am over the age of 18 and not a party to the within action: my business address is 50 Santa Rosa Avenue, Suite 200, Santa Rosa, California 95404. On the date below indicated, and as required by the Court’s Order re: Electronic Service of Pleadings in Case No. CGC- 41-515542 (Lead Case) Consolidated with Case Nos. CGC-12-519794 and CGC-13- 529705, | served on the interested parties through File and Serve Xpress in this action the within document(s) described as: MOTION IN LIMINE #4: MOTION IN LIMINE TO EXCLUDE WITNESSES FROM : COURTROOM EXCEPT EXPERTS on the recipients designated on the Transaction Receipt located on the File and Serve Xpress website. X_ (BY ELECTRONIC MAIL) Based on a-court order or an agreement of the parties to accept service by electronic transmission, on March 4, 2015, | caused the documents to be sent to the persons at the electronic notification addresses listed above. | did not receive within a reasonable time after the transmission, any electronic message or other indication that the transmission was unsuccessful. PLEASE SEE ATTACHED SERVICE LIST. X_ {BY MAIL) by placing the true copies thereof enclosed in sealed envelopes, postage prepaid, addressed as noted below. | caused such envelope to be deposited in the mail at Santa Rosa, California 95404. The envelope was mailed with postage thereon fully prepaid. | am ‘readily familiar’ with our firm's practice of collection and processing correspondence for mailing. it is deposited with the U.S. postal service on that same day in the ordinary course of business. | am aware that on motion of party served, service is presumed invalid if postal cancellation date or postage meter date is more than 1 day after date of deposit for mailing in affidavit. Attorneys for Plaintiff Mitchell E. Green, Esq. Allsiate Insurance Company Law Offices of Mitchell E. Green P.O, Box 630550 Simi Valley, CA 93063 Tel: (805) 823-0915 Fax: (805) 823-0916 MitchGreenLaw@aol.com 3 MOTION IN LIMINE #4: MOTION IN LIMINE TO EXCLUDE WITNESSES FROM COURTROOM EXCEPT EXPERTSoO DU MN OD OH RB BR NY Thomas M. Downey, Esq. Gregory H. McCormick, Esq. Burnham Brown P.O. Box 119 Oakland, CA 94604 Tel: (510) 444-6800 * Fax: (510) 835-6666 tdowney@burnhambrown.com amecormick@bumhambrown.com Attorneys for Defendants San Francisco Independent Taxi Association and Alan Da Silva I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the above is true and correct, and that this declaration was executed on March 4, 2015 at Santa Rosa, California. RoseAnne Powell hPa) 4 MOTION IN LIMINE #4: MOTION IN LIMINE TO EXCLUDE WITNESSES FROM COURTROOM EXCEPT EXPERTSFua v, Sanchez (lead case) San Francisco County Superior Court Case No. CGC~-14-515542 Service List Todd P. Emanuel, Esq, Attorneys for Plaintiff Mark D. Rosenberg, Esq. Ida Cristina Cruz Fua Emanuel Law Group 702 Marshail Street, Suite 400 Redwood City, CA 94063 Tel: (650) 369-8900 Fax: (650) 369-8999 Todd@TEiniurviaw.com Mark@TEinjurylaw.com Robert Peterson, Esq. Attorneys for Defendants/Cross- Colin C. Munro, Esq. Defendants Yellow Cab Christopher J. Weber, Esq. Cooperative, Inc., Taxi Equipment Carlson, Calladine Peterson, LLP Leasing, LLC and Carcline Miller 353 Sacramento Street, 16th Floor San Francisco, CA 94111 Tel: (415) 301-3911 Fax: (415) 391-3898 rpeterson@ccplaw.com cmunro@ccplaw.com eweber@ccplaw.com Robert S. Aaron, Esq. Attorneys for Defendants/Cross- Aaron & Wilson, LLP Defendants Yellow Cab 150 Post Street, Suite 400 Cooperative, Inc., Taxi Equipment San Francisco, CA 94108 Leasing, LLC, Taxi Property Tel: (415) 438-7800 Company, inc., Wolley, LLC, Fax: (415) 438-7808 James Gillespie, Hal Mellegard, rsaaron@aaron-wilson.com Nick Olsen, Pamela Martinez, Richard Wiener, and Steven Reimers