arrow left
arrow right
  • CHARLES TOBEY VS. ASBESTOS DEFENDANTS (B*P) AS REFLECTED ON EXHIBITS et al ASBESTOS document preview
  • CHARLES TOBEY VS. ASBESTOS DEFENDANTS (B*P) AS REFLECTED ON EXHIBITS et al ASBESTOS document preview
  • CHARLES TOBEY VS. ASBESTOS DEFENDANTS (B*P) AS REFLECTED ON EXHIBITS et al ASBESTOS document preview
  • CHARLES TOBEY VS. ASBESTOS DEFENDANTS (B*P) AS REFLECTED ON EXHIBITS et al ASBESTOS document preview
						
                                

Preview

Cr aD DH kk HR NH Se ped fhe tek ek ht Oo Rn & YY YF S&S 17 PRINDLE, DECKER & AMARO LLP KENNETH B. PRINDLE, ESQ. (Bar No. 82691 MARY KIRK HILLYARD, ESQ. (Bar No. 92202 ELECTRONICALLY THOMAS A. STEIG, ESQ. (Bar No. 119341) FILED San Francisco, t Sut B00 04 Superior Cou of catromla Telephone: (418) 788-8354 County of San Prancisce JUN 19 2008 COOLEY MANION JONES LLP GORDON PARK-LI, Clerk 21 Custom House Street BY: EDNALEEN JAVIER-LACSG Boston, MA 02110-3536 Deputy Clerk Telephone: (617) 737-3100 Attorneys for Defendant, A.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO CHARLES TOBEY, CASE NO, CGC-07-274226 Plaintiff(s), DEFENDANT A.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY’S OBJECTION TO vs. STIPULATION OF HEARING COMMISSIONER ASBESTOS DEFENDANTS (BP), et al., Defendant(s). ; } } PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that defendant A.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY does | not stipulate and hereby objects to any Discovery Commissioner hearing any discovery matter in this action pursuant to San Francisco Superior Court Rules DATED: June. LY, 2008 PRINDLE, DECKER & AMARO LLP Attorneys ‘for Defendant, A.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY Objection to Hearing by Commissioner -1- zit 12 PROOF OF SERVICE BY ELECTRONIC TRANSMISSION I, Sunshine D. Robles, declare as follows: That I am, and was as the time of service of the documents herein referred to, over the age of 18 years, and not a party to the action; and J am employed in the County of San Francisco, California. My business address is 369 Pine Street, Suite 800, San Francisco, California 94104. On June fF. 2008, 1 electronically served the document(s) via LexisNexis File & Serve described as: DEFENDANT A.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY’S OBJECTION TO STIPULATION OF HEARING BY COMMISSIONER On the recipients designated on the Transaction Receipt located on the LexisNexis File & Serve website. I declare under penalty of perjury pursuant to the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct and was executed on June (4, 2008 at San Francisco, California. ¢ Ag VAL runshine les Objection to Hearing by Commissioner -2-