Preview
MOOI
San Francisco Superior Courts
Information Technology Group
Document Scanning Lead Sheet
Apr-25-2008 4:22 pm
Case Number: CGC-07-469499
Filing Date: Apr-25-2008 4:22
Juke Box: 001 Image: 02103386
ORDER
BLACKSTONE TECHNOLOGY GROUP, INC. VS. ANDREAS AMUNDIN et al
001002103386
Instructions:
Please place this sheet on top of the document to be scanned.1 | PAYNE & FEARS uP vm L ke
co Attorneys at Law olen County | UPB ries
S 2 | Charles M, Louderback, Bar No. 88788 PSE
S Leila S, Narvid, Bar No. 229402 APR 25 2008
co 3 | One Embarcadero Center, Suite 2300 : CORLL: " $
San Francisco, CA 94111 ‘4 TARR, Gerk
4 4| Telephone: (415) 398-7860 or. Etat. ASK
& Facsimile: (415) 398-7863
. 5 .
, is Attomeys for Defendant/Cross-Complainant
iis 6 | ANDREAS AMUNDIN
a,
1. SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
| 8 : :
: COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO — UNLIMITED JURISDICTION
°
| 10
I BLACKSTONE TECHNOLOGY GROUP, CASE 07-469499
YH INC,
ow | ORDER GRANTING
| wg 12 Plaintiff, DEFENDANT/CROSS-
pos : COMPLAINANT’S MOTION TO
om, be 13 v. . COMPEL THE DEPOSITIONS OF
a s 5% 8 DAVID MYSONA, CASEY COURNEEN
cy epee 14 | “ANDREAS AMUNDIN and DOES 1 through AND RAKESH AGRAWAL
Bu Go 88 >
3 FEE 15
ESes Defendants,
Zs i 16
a Date Action Filed: | November 27, 2007
x 2 17] ANDRELATED CROSS ACTION. Trial Date: October 20, 2008
18
19 The motion of Defendant/Cross-Complainant Andreas Amundin (“Defendant” or
20 “Amundin”) to compel the depositions of David Mysona, Casey Courncen, and Rakesh Agrawal,
1 and for sanctions, was set for hearing on April 17, 2008. The Court’s tentative ruling on the
2 motion was made available via telephone on April 16, 2008 at approximately 3:00 p.m.
4 Plaintiff/Cross-Defendant Blackstone Technology Group, Ino, (“Plaintiff” or “BTG”) did not
24 notify the Court of any objections to the tentative ruling.
: 25 Having considered the pleaditigs in this action, the moving papers, and all such matters as
26 | _ are properly before it, the Court finds good cause for granting the motion to compel.
| 27 ‘
ap — - fo ete — or et ie a ccc
28
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT/CROSS-COMPLAINANT AMUNDIN'S MOTION TO
| COMPEL
|PAYNE & FEARS LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
ONE EMBARCADERO CENTER, SUITE 2300
‘SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94117
(415) 398-7860
3936621
ITIS HEREBY. ORDERED THAT Deféndant’s motion is grarited as set forth below:
Defendant Andreas Artunidit's Motion To Compel Depositions of David Mysona, Casey
Cormeen, and Rakesh Agrawal is granted, He wines hal be Prodoed on dts o be agreed upon by
counsel, but no later than May 9, 2008. All requests for sanctions are denied,
SO ORDERED this_2-5 __ day of April, 2008,
Approved as to form:
DATED; April_{B_, 2008 PAYNE & FEARS LLP
CHARLES M, LOUDERBACK.
LEILAS.NARVID
Br bedi Wastin
LEILA’S. NARVID
Attomeys for Defendant/Cross-Complainant Andreas
Amoundin
DATED: April 8 2008 CURIALE DELLAVERSON HIRSCHFELD &
KRAEMER, LLP
R,
DENA: L, NARBAITZ
AMY A. DURGAN
By: Ove phe,
DENA L. NARBAITZ
AMY A. DURGAN
Attorneys for Plaintiff/Cross-Defendant Blackstone
Technology Group, Inc.
2.
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT/CROSS-COMPLAINANT AMUNDIN'S MOTION TO
. COMPEL
phen
Preview
MOOI San Francisco Superior Courts Information Technology Group Document Scanning Lead Sheet Apr-25-2008 4:22 pm Case Number: CGC-07-469499 Filing Date: Apr-25-2008 4:22 Juke Box: 001 Image: 02103386 ORDER BLACKSTONE TECHNOLOGY GROUP, INC. VS. ANDREAS AMUNDIN et al 001002103386 Instructions: Please place this sheet on top of the document to be scanned.1 | PAYNE & FEARS uP vm L ke co Attorneys at Law olen County | UPB ries S 2 | Charles M, Louderback, Bar No. 88788 PSE S Leila S, Narvid, Bar No. 229402 APR 25 2008 co 3 | One Embarcadero Center, Suite 2300 : CORLL: " $ San Francisco, CA 94111 ‘4 TARR, Gerk 4 4| Telephone: (415) 398-7860 or. Etat. ASK & Facsimile: (415) 398-7863 . 5 . , is Attomeys for Defendant/Cross-Complainant iis 6 | ANDREAS AMUNDIN a, 1. SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA | 8 : : : COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO — UNLIMITED JURISDICTION ° | 10 I BLACKSTONE TECHNOLOGY GROUP, CASE 07-469499 YH INC, ow | ORDER GRANTING | wg 12 Plaintiff, DEFENDANT/CROSS- pos : COMPLAINANT’S MOTION TO om, be 13 v. . COMPEL THE DEPOSITIONS OF a s 5% 8 DAVID MYSONA, CASEY COURNEEN cy epee 14 | “ANDREAS AMUNDIN and DOES 1 through AND RAKESH AGRAWAL Bu Go 88 > 3 FEE 15 ESes Defendants, Zs i 16 a Date Action Filed: | November 27, 2007 x 2 17] ANDRELATED CROSS ACTION. Trial Date: October 20, 2008 18 19 The motion of Defendant/Cross-Complainant Andreas Amundin (“Defendant” or 20 “Amundin”) to compel the depositions of David Mysona, Casey Courncen, and Rakesh Agrawal, 1 and for sanctions, was set for hearing on April 17, 2008. The Court’s tentative ruling on the 2 motion was made available via telephone on April 16, 2008 at approximately 3:00 p.m. 4 Plaintiff/Cross-Defendant Blackstone Technology Group, Ino, (“Plaintiff” or “BTG”) did not 24 notify the Court of any objections to the tentative ruling. : 25 Having considered the pleaditigs in this action, the moving papers, and all such matters as 26 | _ are properly before it, the Court finds good cause for granting the motion to compel. | 27 ‘ ap — - fo ete — or et ie a ccc 28 [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT/CROSS-COMPLAINANT AMUNDIN'S MOTION TO | COMPEL |PAYNE & FEARS LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW ONE EMBARCADERO CENTER, SUITE 2300 ‘SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94117 (415) 398-7860 3936621 ITIS HEREBY. ORDERED THAT Deféndant’s motion is grarited as set forth below: Defendant Andreas Artunidit's Motion To Compel Depositions of David Mysona, Casey Cormeen, and Rakesh Agrawal is granted, He wines hal be Prodoed on dts o be agreed upon by counsel, but no later than May 9, 2008. All requests for sanctions are denied, SO ORDERED this_2-5 __ day of April, 2008, Approved as to form: DATED; April_{B_, 2008 PAYNE & FEARS LLP CHARLES M, LOUDERBACK. LEILAS.NARVID Br bedi Wastin LEILA’S. NARVID Attomeys for Defendant/Cross-Complainant Andreas Amoundin DATED: April 8 2008 CURIALE DELLAVERSON HIRSCHFELD & KRAEMER, LLP R, DENA: L, NARBAITZ AMY A. DURGAN By: Ove phe, DENA L. NARBAITZ AMY A. DURGAN Attorneys for Plaintiff/Cross-Defendant Blackstone Technology Group, Inc. 2. [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT/CROSS-COMPLAINANT AMUNDIN'S MOTION TO . COMPEL phen