Motion,Ex Parte: SEAN MARTIN VS. SHANON LOFTUS et al

• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 

						
                                
Preview
                                Cc 3

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO

Document Scanning Lead Sheet
Jun-09-2014 3:44 pm

Case Number: CGC-14-538489
Filing Date: Jun-09-2014 3:42
Filed by:

Juke Box: 001 Image: 04511640
PROOF OF SERVICE OF MOTION

SEAN MARTIN VS. SHANON LOFTUS et al

001004511640

Instructions:
Please place this sheet on top of the document to be scanned.Tel (415) 778-0800 | Fax (415) 778-0700
www. hedanichoy.com

Hedani, Choy, Spalding & Salvagione, LLP
595 Market Street | Suite 1100 | San Francisco CA 94105

Co ONIN KD H PB WN =

v N RM Be Be eB Be ewe ee Ee ei
BURERRSRRPRSRSRURSEBSH oe

©

RANDALL P. CHOY (SBN 83194)
CHARLIE W. YU (SBN 268233)

HEDANI, CHOY, SPALDING & SALVAGIONE LLP cL —
595 Market Street, Suite 1100 py, CER OF THE counr
San Francisco, CA’94105 ——___epury

Telephone: (415) 778-0800
Facsimile: (415) 778-0700

Attorneys for Plaintiff
SEAN MARTIN

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
UNLIMITED CIVIL JURISDICTION
SEAN MARTIN, an individual, CASE NO. CGC-14-538489
Plaintiff, PROOF OF SERVICE

vs.
Date: July 10, 2014

SHANON LOFTUS, an individual; Time: 9:30am

CHRISTOPHER FENSTER, an individual: Dept.: 501

and DOES 1 through 50, inclusive,

Defendants.

MI
Mit
MM
MI
Ml
Ml
MI
MlHedani, Choy, Spalding & Salvagione, LLP
595 Market Street | Suite 1100 | San Francisco CA 9410S
Tel (415) 778-0800 | Fax (415) 778-0700
www.hedanichoy.com

oem IN DH PF WN

N NN N =e ew ewe ie oe oe ee ee
BURFERRBRUEBRSRRVREPTSR IS

© 8

PROOF OF SERVICE
(C.C-P. SECTION 1013a)

Re: — Martin v. Loftus, et al.
San Francisco County Superior Court Case No. CGC-14-538489

lam a citizen of the United States, over the age of 18 years, and not a party to the
within action. I am employed in the City and County of San Francisco, California, and my
business address is 595 Market Street, Suite 1100, San Francisco, California.

On June 9, 2014, service of the enclosed PLAINTIFF MARTIN’S NOTICE OF
MOTION AND MOTION TO STRIKE DEFENDANT LOFTUS’S ANSWER;
PLAINTIFF MARTIN’S MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO STRIKE
DEFENDANT LOFTUS’S ANSWER; [PROPOSED] ORDER STRIING DEFENDANT
LOFTUS’S ANSWER, was effected on the interested parties in this action by placing a true
copy thereof in a sealed envelope addressed as follows:

Stephanie A. Leroux, Esq.
Law Office of Stephanie A. Leroux
567 Sutter Street, Third Floor
San Francisco, CA 94102
[Attorney for Respondent Shanon Loftus]

/XX/ (BY MAIL) I placed each such sealed envelope, with postage thereon fully prepaid, on
the date of execution of this declaration, with our office's outgoing mail following
ordinary business practices. I am readily familiar with my employer's business practice
for collection and processing of correspondence for mailing. Such correspondence is
deposited with the United States Postal Service, the same day in the ordinary course of
business.

‘1 (BYELECTRONIC MAIL) By causing the document(s) listed above to be served
electronically mailing a true and correct copy through Hedani, Choy, Spalding &
Salvagione’s electronic mail system to the e-mail address(es), as stated in the above
list, and the transmission was reported as completed and no error was Teported.

// (BY FACSIMILE) I caused the said document(s) to be transmitted by Facsimile to the
numbers indicated above.

// GY PERSONAL SERVICE) I caused each such envelope to be delivered by hand to
e addressee(s) noted above.

I certify under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the
foregoing is true and correct.

Executed on June 9, 2014, in the City and County of San Francisco, California.

MIMI MAO MADAYA‘