Preview
Donald A. Wilson(California Bar No. 43993)
* |] Wilson & Wilson
2 || 1695 Broadway Street
Redwood City, California
3 || Tel: (650) 366 -8241
4 FAX: (650) 596 0595
Email: wildon43@gmail.com
5
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
6
7
8 . SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN MATEO
9 (UNLIMITED JURISDICTION)
10 ,
11|| Golden Global Enterprises Inc., a )
California Corporation, Golden Global —_)
12 || Investment Trust — 2017, by and )
13 ||through its’Trustee, Donald A. Wilson, )
and 8880 ELDER CREEK )
14 || HOLDINGS, a California Limited )
sb Liability Corporation ) Case No. 22-CIV-02099
)
16 Plaintiffs ) NOTICE OF COURT ORDER IN
‘) RELATED CASE AND REQUEST FOR
17 liv ) SIMILAR ORDER
18
19 || TIM ONDERKO, an Individual, andas_)
owner of a 49% interest in 8880 Elder _)
20 ||Creek Holdings,LLC, a California )
51 Limited Liability Corporation, and )
Does 1-10, inclusive, )
22 )
Defendants )
23 )
24
25
Notice ishereby given that in the related case 22-CIV-02332 also pending before this
26
>7 || Court, the Order, attached as Exhibit A was duly made and entered.
28 |
4 As the parties and issues are substantially the same and the MOU which is atthe core of
2 | the dispute requires “good faith mediation”, a request is made that a similar order be entered in
3 | thismatter and that the meditations be combined.
,
: : Dated (2 )2)/ at Respectfully submitted,
é 5 y
8 om" Donald A. son
9 2
16
1 fe
12 He
-
14
15 |
LS fe
17
18
19
20 |P-
24 |
22
23
24
25 |
26
27
28 |
eee
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF SAN MATEO
ORDER VACATING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE,
AS THE ACTION IS “AT ISSUE” AND CASE ISORDERED TO ADR F | LE D
In the Matter of: TIM ONDERKO vs. DONALD WILSON, et SAN MATEO COUNTY
. al 9/22/2022
: By /s/ LilianaCervantes
Case Number: 22-ClV-02332 “ADR Program Analyst
TO ALL PARTIES AND THEIR COUNSEL OF RECORD:
THE COURT FINDS as follows:
An initialCase Management Conference was previously ordered and scheduled for 10/06/2022
in thisaction.
Pursuant to Rule 3.722(d) of the California Rules of Court, based upon the Court’s review of
the filed Case Management Statement(s) and the docket of this action, the Court determines that
appearances at the Conference are not necessary at this time, as this action is “at issue”; and
determines that the Case Management Conference should be vacated as allparties have indicated in
their Case Management Statements that they are agreeable to participating in the ADR Process -
Private Settlement Conference.
In accordance with Local Rules 3.805 and 3.904(b), allparties referred to ADR must complete a
Stipulation and Order to ADR (ADR-CV-1), and file it with the Clerk of the Superior Court. In
accordance with Local Rule 2.1.7, allparties, except for self-represented litigants, are required to file
the Stipulation and Order to ADR electronically.
IT ISHEREBY ORDERED as follows:
1. The initialCase Management Conference isVACATED.
2. No later than 21 days from the date of this Order, parties must complete and sign a
Stipulation and Order to ADR (ADR-CV-1), and fileit with the Clerk of the Superior Court, pursuant to
Local Rule 3.904(b).
3. The Private Settlement Conference shall be completed no laterthan 90 days from the date
of this Order.
4. Pursuant to Local Rule 0.2, Local Rule 3.805(h), and CRC Rule 2.30, the Court is empowered
to impose monetary sanctions of a minimum of $150.00 upon any party or their counsel for failure to
follow the requirements of this Order, or of the California Rules of Court, or of the Code of Civil
Procedure. Ifyou failto follow the requirements of this Order, you willbe subject to an order to show
cause as to why monetary sanctions of $150.00, or some other amount, should not be imposed against
you.
5. PLAINTIFF(S) must serve this Order on allparties not listedon the Court’s proof of service
within five (S)days of the date of this Order.
DATED: 9/22/2022 Ernst A. Halperin
Honorable Ernst A. Halperin, CIVIL COMMISSIONER
Se SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN MATEO COUNTY
meee 400 County Center, Redwood City,CA 94063
x anni Me (650) 261-5100
%,Noe
a Rarer we
A www.sanmateocourt.org
AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING
Date: 9/22/2022
In the Matter of:TIM ONDERKO vs. DONALD WILSON, et al
Case Number: 22-CIV-02332
I declare under penalty of perjury that on the following date | deposited inthe United States Post
Office mail box at Redwood City, a true copy of the attached document(s) order continuing case
management conference, enclosed in an envelope, with proper and necessary postage thereon, and
addressed to the following:
Executed on: 9/22/2022 |
Neal | Taniguchi, Court Executive Officer/Clerk
O : By: /s/ Liliana Cervantes
. LifianaCervantes, ADR Program Analyst
Copies mailedto:
DOMINIC V SIGNOROTTI MCKENNA BRINK SIGNOROTTI LLP
1350 TREAT BOULEVARD SUITE 105
WALNUT CREEK CA 94597
CHRISTINE E.JACOB HANSEN KOHLS SUMMER AND JACOB LLP
1520 EUREKA ROAD SUITE 100
ROSEVILLE CA 95661
Preview
Donald A. Wilson(California Bar No. 43993) * |] Wilson & Wilson 2 || 1695 Broadway Street Redwood City, California 3 || Tel: (650) 366 -8241 4 FAX: (650) 596 0595 Email: wildon43@gmail.com 5 Attorneys for Plaintiffs 6 7 8 . SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN MATEO 9 (UNLIMITED JURISDICTION) 10 , 11|| Golden Global Enterprises Inc., a ) California Corporation, Golden Global —_) 12 || Investment Trust — 2017, by and ) 13 ||through its’Trustee, Donald A. Wilson, ) and 8880 ELDER CREEK ) 14 || HOLDINGS, a California Limited ) sb Liability Corporation ) Case No. 22-CIV-02099 ) 16 Plaintiffs ) NOTICE OF COURT ORDER IN ‘) RELATED CASE AND REQUEST FOR 17 liv ) SIMILAR ORDER 18 19 || TIM ONDERKO, an Individual, andas_) owner of a 49% interest in 8880 Elder _) 20 ||Creek Holdings,LLC, a California ) 51 Limited Liability Corporation, and ) Does 1-10, inclusive, ) 22 ) Defendants ) 23 ) 24 25 Notice ishereby given that in the related case 22-CIV-02332 also pending before this 26 >7 || Court, the Order, attached as Exhibit A was duly made and entered. 28 | 4 As the parties and issues are substantially the same and the MOU which is atthe core of 2 | the dispute requires “good faith mediation”, a request is made that a similar order be entered in 3 | thismatter and that the meditations be combined. , : : Dated (2 )2)/ at Respectfully submitted, é 5 y 8 om" Donald A. son 9 2 16 1 fe 12 He - 14 15 | LS fe 17 18 19 20 |P- 24 | 22 23 24 25 | 26 27 28 | eee SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN MATEO ORDER VACATING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE, AS THE ACTION IS “AT ISSUE” AND CASE ISORDERED TO ADR F | LE D In the Matter of: TIM ONDERKO vs. DONALD WILSON, et SAN MATEO COUNTY . al 9/22/2022 : By /s/ LilianaCervantes Case Number: 22-ClV-02332 “ADR Program Analyst TO ALL PARTIES AND THEIR COUNSEL OF RECORD: THE COURT FINDS as follows: An initialCase Management Conference was previously ordered and scheduled for 10/06/2022 in thisaction. Pursuant to Rule 3.722(d) of the California Rules of Court, based upon the Court’s review of the filed Case Management Statement(s) and the docket of this action, the Court determines that appearances at the Conference are not necessary at this time, as this action is “at issue”; and determines that the Case Management Conference should be vacated as allparties have indicated in their Case Management Statements that they are agreeable to participating in the ADR Process - Private Settlement Conference. In accordance with Local Rules 3.805 and 3.904(b), allparties referred to ADR must complete a Stipulation and Order to ADR (ADR-CV-1), and file it with the Clerk of the Superior Court. In accordance with Local Rule 2.1.7, allparties, except for self-represented litigants, are required to file the Stipulation and Order to ADR electronically. IT ISHEREBY ORDERED as follows: 1. The initialCase Management Conference isVACATED. 2. No later than 21 days from the date of this Order, parties must complete and sign a Stipulation and Order to ADR (ADR-CV-1), and fileit with the Clerk of the Superior Court, pursuant to Local Rule 3.904(b). 3. The Private Settlement Conference shall be completed no laterthan 90 days from the date of this Order. 4. Pursuant to Local Rule 0.2, Local Rule 3.805(h), and CRC Rule 2.30, the Court is empowered to impose monetary sanctions of a minimum of $150.00 upon any party or their counsel for failure to follow the requirements of this Order, or of the California Rules of Court, or of the Code of Civil Procedure. Ifyou failto follow the requirements of this Order, you willbe subject to an order to show cause as to why monetary sanctions of $150.00, or some other amount, should not be imposed against you. 5. PLAINTIFF(S) must serve this Order on allparties not listedon the Court’s proof of service within five (S)days of the date of this Order. DATED: 9/22/2022 Ernst A. Halperin Honorable Ernst A. Halperin, CIVIL COMMISSIONER Se SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN MATEO COUNTY meee 400 County Center, Redwood City,CA 94063 x anni Me (650) 261-5100 %,Noe a Rarer we A www.sanmateocourt.org AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING Date: 9/22/2022 In the Matter of:TIM ONDERKO vs. DONALD WILSON, et al Case Number: 22-CIV-02332 I declare under penalty of perjury that on the following date | deposited inthe United States Post Office mail box at Redwood City, a true copy of the attached document(s) order continuing case management conference, enclosed in an envelope, with proper and necessary postage thereon, and addressed to the following: Executed on: 9/22/2022 | Neal | Taniguchi, Court Executive Officer/Clerk O : By: /s/ Liliana Cervantes . LifianaCervantes, ADR Program Analyst Copies mailedto: DOMINIC V SIGNOROTTI MCKENNA BRINK SIGNOROTTI LLP 1350 TREAT BOULEVARD SUITE 105 WALNUT CREEK CA 94597 CHRISTINE E.JACOB HANSEN KOHLS SUMMER AND JACOB LLP 1520 EUREKA ROAD SUITE 100 ROSEVILLE CA 95661