On June 22, 2006 a
Party Discovery
was filed
involving a dispute between
Economy Restaurant Fixtures, A Corporation,
and
Chao, Yu Ling,
Does 1-V,
Does 1-X And Each Of Them Inclusive,
Fen, Chao Chung,
Liu, Catherine T,
Pier 6 Chinese Restaurant, A Partnership Composed,
for COMMON COUNTS/OPEN BOOK ACCOUNT/COLLECTIONS
in the District Court of San Francisco County.
Preview
IOUT
San Francisco Superior Courts
Information Technology Group
Document Scanning Lead Sheet
Dec-01-2006 1:01 pm
Case Number: CGC-06-453414
Filing Date: Dec-01-2006 12:55
Juke Box: 001 Image: 01612744
\PPLICATION TO THE CLERK FOR JUDGMENT UNDER SEC 585(
\URANT FIXTURES, A CORPORATION VS. PIER 6 CHINESE RESTAURANT, A PARTNEF
001001612744
Instructions:
Please place this sheet on top of the document to be scanned.JUD-100
ATTORNEY OR PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY (Name, s._ar number, and. address):
DAVID J. COOK, Esq. SBN 060859 :
| COOK, PERKISS & LEW, A Professional Law Corpora
333 Pine Street, San Francisco, CA 94104
PO Box 270, San Francisco, CA 94104
File No. 51,021
TetepHonENO. 415 989 4730 FAXNO. (Options): 415 989 0491
E-MAIL ADDRESS (Optional)
ATTORNEY FOR (Name) Plaintiff
FOR COURT USE ONLY
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
STREETADDRESS: SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT
MAILING ADDRESS’ 400 McAllister Street
cityanozipcoves San Francisco, CA 94102
BRANCH NAME: LIMITED CIVIL JURISDICTION
PLAINTIFF: ECONOMY RESTAURANT FIXTURES, a
corporation
DEFENDANT: PIER 6 CHINESE RESTAURANT, a partnership composed of CHA
JUDGMENT CASE NUMBER:
X By Clerk X By Default After Court Trial CGC06 453414
By Court On Stipulation Defendant Did Not
Appear at Trial
JUDGMENT
1. X > BY DEFAULT
a, Defendant was properly served with a copy of the summons and complaint.
b. Defendant failed to answer the complaint or appear and defend the action within the time allowed by law.
c. Defendant's default was entered by the clerk upon plaintiff's application,
d. X_ Clerk's Judgment (Code Civ. Proc., § 585(a)). Defendant was sued only on a contract or judgment of a court of
this state for the recovery of money.
e. ~ Court Judgment (Code Civ. Proc., § 585(b)). The court considered
(1) __ Plaintiffs testimony and other evidence.
(2) plaintiffs written declaration (Code Civ. Proc., § 585(d)).
2. ON STIPULATION
a. Plaintiff and defendant agreed (stipulated) that a judgment be entered in this case. The court approved the stipulated
judgment and
b. the signed written stipulation was filed in the case.
c. the stipulation was stated in open court the stipulation was stated on the record.
3. _ AFTER COURT TRIAL. The jury was waived. The court considered the evidence.
a. The case was tried on (date and time):
before (name of judicial officer):
b. Appearances by:
Plaintiff (name each):
(1)
(2)
Continued on Attachment 3b.
Defendant (name each):
Plaintiff's attorney (name each):
(1)
(2)
Defendant 's attorney (name each):
(1) (1)
(2) (2)
_.... Continued on Attachment 3b.
c. Defendant did not appear at trial. Defendant was properly served with notice of trial.
d. _ Astatement of decision (Code Civ. Proc., § 632) was not was requested.
Page 1 of 2
Form Approved for Optional Use JUDGMENT Code of Civil Procedure, §§ 585, 664.6
Judicial Council of California
JUD-100 [New January 1, 2002)
Solutions:
ta
WePLAINTIFF: ECONOMY RESTAURAN:~FIXTURES, a corporation _ASE NUMBER:
| : CGCO6 453414
DEFENDANT: PIER 6 CHINESE RESTAURANT, a partnership composed of CHAO CHUN
JUDGMENT IS ENTERED AS FOLLOWS BY: _. THE COURT _X_ THE CLERK
4. Stipulated Judgment. Judgment is entered according to the stipulation of the parties.
5. Parties. Judgment is
a. X for plaintiff (name each): ECONOMY RESTAURANT c. for cross-complainant (name each):
FIXTURES, a corporation
inst defendant |. PIER 6 CHINESE RESTAURANT and against cross-defendant hy:
a partne ship se tenda| (2° 2EXo CHUNG FEN, YU LING CHAO, “0 293s Cross-defendan (name each)
CATHERINE T. LIU; CHAO CHUNG FEN, YU LING CHAO and
CATHERINE T. LIU each ind. and dba PIER 6 CHINESE
_ Continued on Attachment Sa. RESTAURANT _. Continued on Attachment 5c.
b. for defendant (name each): d. for cross-defendant (name each):
6. Amount.
a. X Defendant named in item 5a above must c. Cross-defendant named in item 5c above must pay
pay plaintiff on the complaint: cross-complainant on the cross-complaint:
(1) X Damages $ 7,329.15 (1) Damages $
(2) X — Prejudgment $ 323.61 (2) Prejudgment $
interest at the interest at the
annual rate of 10% annual rate of %
(3) X Attorney fees $ 1,000.00 (3) Attomey fees $
(4) X Costs $ 460.00 (4) Costs
(5) Other (specify): $ (5) Other (specify): $
(6) TOTAL $ 9,112.76 (6) TOTAL $
b. Plaintiff to receive nothing from defendant d. Cross-complainant to receive nothing from
named in item 5b. cross-defendant named in item 5d.
Defendant named in item 5b to recover Cross-defendant named in item 5d to recover
costs $ costs $
and attorney fees $ and attorney fees $
7. Other (specify):
Date: Lo. ‘
OFFICER
Date: DEC - 1 2006 Clerk, C ee) , Deputy
(SEAL) CLERK'S CERTIFICATE (Optional)
| certify that this is a true copy of the original jud$ment on file in the court.
Date:
Clerk, by , Deputy
Page 2 of 2
‘JUD-100 [New January 1, 2002} - JUDGMENT
Document Filed Date
December 01, 2006
Case Filing Date
June 22, 2006
Category
COMMON COUNTS/OPEN BOOK ACCOUNT/COLLECTIONS
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.