arrow left
arrow right
  • KINGSTON WELLNESS, INC. VS. MONICA ANGELES OTHER NON EXEMPT COMPLAINTS document preview
  • KINGSTON WELLNESS, INC. VS. MONICA ANGELES OTHER NON EXEMPT COMPLAINTS document preview
  • KINGSTON WELLNESS, INC. VS. MONICA ANGELES OTHER NON EXEMPT COMPLAINTS document preview
  • KINGSTON WELLNESS, INC. VS. MONICA ANGELES OTHER NON EXEMPT COMPLAINTS document preview
						
                                

Preview

w Lauren A. Vazquez SBN 267880 Law Office of Lauren A. Vazquez 2601 Blanding Ave. Suite C-204 Alameda, CA 94501 Tel: 805-217-6116 1-855-665-5297 Attorney for Plaintiff KINGSTON WELLNESS, INC., ELECTRONICALLY FILED Superior Court of California, County of San Francisco 10/08/2015 Clerk of the Court BY:BOWMAN LIU Deputy Clerk SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA Plaintiff, v. MONICA ANGELES, Defendant. COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO Case No.: CGC 13-535535 STIPULATED EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR ORDER WAIVING ELECTRONIC SERVICE PROVIDER FEES Cal. Rule of Court 3.1103 Date: October 9, 2015 Time: 11:00am Dept.: 302 Hon. Judge Goldsmith Filed: May 27, 2014 PLAINTIFF hereby applies ex parte for an order waiving the fees charged by the electronic filing service provider for mandatory e-filing. 1. This application is based upon California Rule of Court 2.25(b)(6) which requires the Court to waive the fees charged by the mandatory electronic service provider when deemed appropriate by the Court, including the fees for any party that has received a fee waiver. This application is also based upon Cal. Rules of Court 3.1200 to 3.1207 which set forth the requirements of an ex parte application. . This application is also based upon Local Rule of Court for the San Francisco Superior Court 2.10. Pursuant to this rule, Plaintiff's application is being heard in the department to which the case is assigned rather than the Presiding Judge. 1 STIPULATED EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR ORDER WAIVING ELECTRONIC SERVICE PROVIDER FEES - CGC 13-535535w . Plaintiff has complied with the local rules for filing an application to waive the electronic service provider fees. However, Local Rule 2.10(D)(2) requires Plaintiff to submit a declaration stating that it has met the requirements of Cal. Rule of Court 2.25(b)(4). But this application is not based on this rule, it is based on Cal. Rule of Court 2.25(b)(6). The local rules do not address applications pursuant to this rule. Plaintiff's declaration therefore sets forth facts showing it meets the requirements of Rule 2.25(b)(6) rather than Rule 2.25(b)(4). . Pursuant to Cal. Rule of Court 3.1202(c), this application is based on the declaration of Jenny Jiminez, filed herewith, setting forth the facts showing a statutory basis for granting the application. . The attorney of record for the Defendant is Hasmik Geghamyan, located at 2323 Broadway Street Oakland, California 94612, telephone 415-857-5548. . As set forth in the declaration of Plaintiff Counsel Lauren A. Vazquez, filed herewith, the Defendant was appropriately notified of this application by email on September 23, 2015, Defense Counsel responded to the email on September 24, 2015. Defendant will also be electronically served when this application and supporting documents are electronically filed. The transaction record of the electronic service will be attached to the proof of service of the ex parte application and supporting documents. . Defense Counsel has stipulated not to oppose or appear at the hearing on this application. . For the foregoing reasons, Plaintiff respectfully prays for an order waiving the electronic service provider fees. Respectfully submitted, Dated: September 24 , 2015 By: _/s/ Lauren Vazquez Lauren A. Vazquez Attorney for Plaintiff 2 STIPULATED EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR ORDER WAIVING ELECTRONIC SERVICE PROVIDER FEES - CGC 13-535535