On August 30, 2013 a
Hearing
was filed
involving a dispute between
Leeman Phd, Whitney R,
and
Dean Distributors, Inc,
Does 1 To 150, Inclusive,
for civil
in the District Court of San Francisco County.
Preview
w
Brian C. Johnson, State Bar No. 235965
Josh Voorhees, State Bar No. 241436
THE CHANLER GROUP
2560 Ninth Street ELECTRONICALLY
Parker Plaza, Suite 214 FILED
Berkeley, CA 94710 Superior Court of California,
‘Telephone: (510) 848-8880 County of San Francisco
Facsimile: (510) 848-8118 JAN 15 2015
Clerk of the Court
Attorneys for Plaintiff BY: RONNIE OTERO
WHITNEY R. LEEMAN, PH.D. Deputy Clerk
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
UNLIMITED CIVIL JURISDICTION
WHITNEY R. LEEMAN, PH.D., Case No. CGC-13-533956
Plaintiff, NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION TO
APPROVE PROPOSITION 65
SETTLEMENT AND CONSENT
DEAN DISTRIBUTORS, INC., et al, JUDGMENT
Ww
Defendants. Date: February 26, 2015
Time: 9:30am.
Dept. 302
Judge: Hon, Ernest H. Goldsmith
Reservation No. 010615-05Oo oe MN
10
i
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
ai
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
TO ALL PARTIES AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD:
PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that, on February 26, 2015 at 9:30 a.m. or as soon after
as counsel may be heard, in Department 302 of the Superior Court for the County of San
Francisco, located at 400 McAllister Street, San Francisco, California,, Plaintiff Whitney
R. Leeman, Ph.D., will, and hereby does, move this Court for its approval the settlement
reached with defendant Dean Distributors, Inc. in this action involving alleged violations
of Health and Safety Code section 25249.6 et seq. (Proposition 65). Pursuant to Health
and Safety Code section 25249. 7(£(4) and Code of Civil Procedure section 664.6, Plaintiff
respectfully requests that the Court sign the [Proposed] Order Approving Proposition 65
Settlement and Consent Judgment lodged herewith, and enter the [Proposed] Judgment
Pursuant to Terms of Proposition 65 Settlement and Consent Judgment also submitted
herewith.
The Motion is based upon this Notice, the Memorandum of Points and Authorities,
the supporting Declaration of Brian Johnson, and the declaration regarding compliance
with regulatory requirements filed herewith; the complete files and records in this action;
and any other evidence and argument that may be presented to the Court at or prior to the
hearing.
ae Respectfully submitted,
Dated: January !P*.,.2015 THE CHANLER GROUP
1
“IOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION TO APPROVE PROP. 65 SETTLEMENT & CONSENT JUDGMENT
Document Filed Date
January 15, 2015
Case Filing Date
August 30, 2013
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Preview
w Brian C. Johnson, State Bar No. 235965 Josh Voorhees, State Bar No. 241436 THE CHANLER GROUP 2560 Ninth Street ELECTRONICALLY Parker Plaza, Suite 214 FILED Berkeley, CA 94710 Superior Court of California, ‘Telephone: (510) 848-8880 County of San Francisco Facsimile: (510) 848-8118 JAN 15 2015 Clerk of the Court Attorneys for Plaintiff BY: RONNIE OTERO WHITNEY R. LEEMAN, PH.D. Deputy Clerk SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO UNLIMITED CIVIL JURISDICTION WHITNEY R. LEEMAN, PH.D., Case No. CGC-13-533956 Plaintiff, NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION TO APPROVE PROPOSITION 65 SETTLEMENT AND CONSENT DEAN DISTRIBUTORS, INC., et al, JUDGMENT Ww Defendants. Date: February 26, 2015 Time: 9:30am. Dept. 302 Judge: Hon, Ernest H. Goldsmith Reservation No. 010615-05Oo oe MN 10 i 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 ai 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 TO ALL PARTIES AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD: PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that, on February 26, 2015 at 9:30 a.m. or as soon after as counsel may be heard, in Department 302 of the Superior Court for the County of San Francisco, located at 400 McAllister Street, San Francisco, California,, Plaintiff Whitney R. Leeman, Ph.D., will, and hereby does, move this Court for its approval the settlement reached with defendant Dean Distributors, Inc. in this action involving alleged violations of Health and Safety Code section 25249.6 et seq. (Proposition 65). Pursuant to Health and Safety Code section 25249. 7(£(4) and Code of Civil Procedure section 664.6, Plaintiff respectfully requests that the Court sign the [Proposed] Order Approving Proposition 65 Settlement and Consent Judgment lodged herewith, and enter the [Proposed] Judgment Pursuant to Terms of Proposition 65 Settlement and Consent Judgment also submitted herewith. The Motion is based upon this Notice, the Memorandum of Points and Authorities, the supporting Declaration of Brian Johnson, and the declaration regarding compliance with regulatory requirements filed herewith; the complete files and records in this action; and any other evidence and argument that may be presented to the Court at or prior to the hearing. ae Respectfully submitted, Dated: January !P*.,.2015 THE CHANLER GROUP 1 “IOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION TO APPROVE PROP. 65 SETTLEMENT & CONSENT JUDGMENT