arrow left
arrow right
  • HAROLD KOEPKE et al VS. FORD MOTOR COMPANY et al ASBESTOS document preview
  • HAROLD KOEPKE et al VS. FORD MOTOR COMPANY et al ASBESTOS document preview
  • HAROLD KOEPKE et al VS. FORD MOTOR COMPANY et al ASBESTOS document preview
  • HAROLD KOEPKE et al VS. FORD MOTOR COMPANY et al ASBESTOS document preview
  • HAROLD KOEPKE et al VS. FORD MOTOR COMPANY et al ASBESTOS document preview
  • HAROLD KOEPKE et al VS. FORD MOTOR COMPANY et al ASBESTOS document preview
  • HAROLD KOEPKE et al VS. FORD MOTOR COMPANY et al ASBESTOS document preview
  • HAROLD KOEPKE et al VS. FORD MOTOR COMPANY et al ASBESTOS document preview
						
                                

Preview

— oo ON DW HU BF WN HASSARD BONNINGTON LLP ROBERT M. HAMBLETT, ESQ., State Bar No. 117685 EDWARD E. HARTLEY, ESQ., State Bar No. 122892 MARK C. DAVIS, ESQ,, State Bar No. 165779 Two Embarcadero Center, Suite 1800 San Francisco, California 94111-3993 Telephone: (415) 288-9800 Fax: (415) 288-9801 Attorneys for Defendant FMC TECHNOLOGIES, INC. ELECTRONICALLY FILED Superior Court of California, County of San Francisco MAY 07 2014 Clerk of the Court BY: MICHAEL RAYRAY Deputy Clerk IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO UNLIMITED JURISDICTION HAROLD KOEPKE and NANCY KARDIS- KOEPKE, Plaintiffs, vs. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, et al., Defendants. 4. No. CGC-13-276217 EXHIBITS F- G TO THE DECLARATION OF MARK C. DAVIS IN SUPPORT OF FMC TECHNOLOGIES, INC.’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND/OR SUMMARY ADJUDICATION Date: June 4, 2014 Time: 9:30 a.m. Dept: 503 Judge: Hon. Teri L. Jackson Complaint Filed: July 25, 2013 Trial Date: February 10, 2014 {Concurrently filed with Points and Authorities in Support of Motion; Separate Statement of Undisputed Material Facts; Declaration of Mark C. Davis; Proposed Order] EXHIBITS TO THE DECLARATION OF MARK C. DAVIS IN SUPPORT OF FMC TECHNOLOGIES, INC.'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND/OR SUMMARY ADJUDICATIONEXHIBIT Fo.clUcmODlClCO NUD RON DS BM BM NY NY DY Ba se Bw wo ow we SB BR Ba oe on FB WwW NYO = OD O WwW NHN DW oO BF WO NY = IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ---000--- HAROLD KOEPKE AND NANCY KARIDIS-KOEPKE, Plaintiffs, VS. No. CGC13 276217 FORD MOTOR COMPANY, et al., Defendants. VIDEOTAPED DEPOSITION OF GARY MCARTHUR (PMQ ~ BELNORTEL) Taken before EARLY LANGLEY, CLR, RSA, RMR CSR No. 3537 May 1, 2014 Aiken Welch Court Reporters One Kaiser Plaza, Suite 250 Oakiand, California 94612 (510) 451-1580/(877) 451-1580 Fax: (510) 451-3797 www.aikenwelch.comoOo ON OD oO FF WwW NY = My MO NY YB KH HY B=@ s=e Bs Boa mw Baw Ba a Sa ana Bb Oo NYO = OO BN DO HO FF WOW NY = MS. MCCORMICK: That's fine. MS. BOSCH: Thank you, Counsel. (Whereupon, Exhibits 3 and 4 were marked for Identification.) MS. BOSCH: I've got premarked stickers 13:20 here. BY MS. BOSCH: Q. Sir, are you currently retired? A. Yes. Q. And my understanding is that in 1972 you 13:20 purchased a company called "Throwbot"; is that right? A. That's right. Q. And in 1978 you purchased a company called "Belnortel"; is that right? 13:20 A. That's right. Q. And both companies were engaged in, what I'm going to refer to as the "mobile brake service business"; is that right? A. That's right. 13:20 Q. We're going to talk some more about that in a little bit, but before we do that, I'd like to go back and ask you a few questions about your work history prior to 1972. Is it fair that you graduated from high 13:21 16 Aiken Welch Court Reporters Gary McArthur 05-01-2014oo ON OO OO Fe WO NY Ss mM MM BH HY MY we Bw we Bw Bw ew me a fF oO NYS = 0 O© wa NN DO TO FF WO NY = 37 Q. Now, the ABC Mobile truck that is depicted in that convention magazine, does that look consistent with the way the trucks that you had as part of Throwbot were -- what they looked like? MR. HARTLEY: Vague and ambiguous. 13:42 THE WITNESS: Yes. BY MS. BOSCH: Q. And we'll get to this in a little bit, but in 1978, you bought a company called "Belnortel." And that company also had an ABC Mobile Systems 13:42 franchise; right? A. Right. Q. Now -- and you also had trucks as part of that Belnortel business; right? A. Correct. 13:42 Q. Did the trucks that you have as part of Belnortel, did they look consistent with what's depicted in the picture here on the page ABC 90005? MR. HARTLEY: Vague and ambiguous. 13:43 MS. MCCORMICK: Overbroad. You can answer. THE WITNESS: Oh, okay. Essentially, yes. BY MS. BOSCH: 13:43 Aiken Welch Court Reporters Gary McArthur 05-01-2014oo OO NO OO RF Ww DY = mw NM NS NY NY KY B= | =e |= Ss Fe sea Fe | Ss a BB Oo ND = OO 0 @O nN OW TO FF WN = brake arcing machine that was in the trucks that you owned for Throwbot? MS. MR. Overbroad. MS. THE BY MS. BOSCH: Q. How business, do name of the brake arcing machines that were in the MCCORMICK: Overbroad. HARTLEY: Vague and ambiguous. MCCORMICK: Beyond the scope. WITNESS: They were Barrett. about when you bought the Belnortel you recall the names -- the brand vans that you acquired as part of your purchase? MR. Overbroad. THE BY MS. BOSCH: Q. Was THE BY MS. BOSCH: Q. Were the Barrett brake machines that you HARTLEY: Vague. Ambiguous. WITNESS: They were the same. they Barrett as well? HARTLEY: Same objections. WITNESS: Yes. acquired when you acquired Throwbot or when you acquired Belnortel that were in the vans, were they consistent with what's depicted in ABC 0040? MR. HARTLEY: Vague. Ambiguous. 13:52 13:52 13:53 13:53 13:53 46 Aiken Welch Court Reporters Gary McArthur 05-01-2014oo wm N DO oO FF WO NY = My NH NY KY NK SF =e =e eA eteeeoeea a & © YM 3 56 © ON OD aA F Ow DY = 54 A. Barrett. Q. And is the machine depicted on Exhibit No. 8 consistent with what you recall being in the trucks that you had as part of Throwbot and Belnortel? 13:57 MS. MCCORMICK: Vague. Overbroad. Calls for speculation. Lacks foundation. Authentication. MR. HARTLEY: And compound. THE WITNESS: Yes. 13:57 BY MS. BOSCH: Q. Just in light of counsel's objections, I'm going to ask it again. Is the machine depicted on Exhibit No. 8, sir, consistent with the brake machines -- brake 13:57 arcing machines that were in the trucks that you acquired when you purchased Belnortel? MS. MCCORMICK: Same objections. Go ahead. THE WITNESS: Yes. 13:57 BY MS. BOSCH: Q. And if we juxtapose Exhibit No. 8 and Exhibit No. 6, ABC 00040, do these machines look similar? MR. HARTLEY: Objection. Vague. 13:58 Aiken Welch Court Reporters Gary McArthur 05-01-2014oOo ON ODO oOo kk WwW YP = My mM NY NY YY NY BS =F Bs Ss sae ses sess a B wo NY = OD O© An DO TH BR WO DN = 68 THE WITNESS: No. BY MS. BOSCH: Q@. Do you recall any presentations by anyone about the health hazards of asbestos? A. No. 14:26 Q. 1978. You and Mr. Norris, Chester Norris, bought a company called Belnertel; right? A. Right. Q. And you bought that company from three gentlemen, Roger Bell, Bob Pimentel, and Ralph 14:27 L'Allier; is that right? A. That's correct. MS. MCCORMICK: Vague and overbroad. BY MS. BOSCH: Q. Did I pronounce their names correctly? 14:27 A. That's pretty close. Q. Now, you brought with you today in response to our notices some documents; is that right, six? A. Yes. 14:27 Q@. And you have the originals of these documents right there in front of you? MS. MCCORMICK: Right. We brought those so you can look at them at the deposition, but we're going to keep those in our possession. 14:27 Aiken Welch Court Reporters Gary McArthur 05-01-2014oo ON DO oO BF Ww NY = mh MM NY NY NY B= = |= BP fF Fs se se = BF a B wo YO = 0 © A nN Oa FF oOo NY 77 Exhibit 9. MS. MCCORMICK: Thank you. BY MS. BOSCH: Q. When you acquired Belnortel, sir, was it your understanding that AB -- that Belnortel had 14:36 exclusive territory for its ABC Mobile trucks? A. Yes. MR. HARTLEY: Objection. Vague and ambiguous. BY MS. BOSCH: 14:36 Q@. And it's ABC Brake -- for its ABC Mobile Brakes trucks. I just want to make I had the name right. MS. MCCORMICK: And vague. THE WITNESS: Yes. 14:36 MR. HARTLEY: Same objections. BY MS. BOSCH: Q. What territories did you purchase as part of Belnortel? A. We purchased three territories, and they 14:37 were in these three documents. I believe they were Territory 7, 8, and 9. Q. And when you say "these three documents, ™ they're the three lease agreements that we marked as Exhibit -- Aiken Welch Court Reporters Gary McArthur 05-01-2014oO Oo ODN ODO oO F&F Ww HY > pp DM wD NY YB NY B= |B Bw BS SB BSB Ss 2a |= SS a Bw NY = 9D © ON DO oO FW rH = 81 B Well, I know where 7th and Howard is. Q In San Francisco? A. I mean, i can find it. Q Was that part of Territory Ne. 6? A I thought it was part of Territory No. 7. 14:41 Q. It was part of one of the territories that you had, either 6, 7, or 8; right? A. Right. Q. So it was in the Belnortel area -~- A. Yes. 14:41 Q. -- for the ABC Mobile Brake franchise; vight? A. Yes. Q. Do you recall a Shell station at the corner of 7th and Howard as being one of your 14:41 customer's when you purchased Belnortel? MR. HARTLEY: Vague and ambiguous. MS. MCCORMICK: Assumes facts. THE WITNESS: No. BY MS. BOSCH: 14:41 Q. Do you recall ever meeting a gentleman by the name of Harold Koepke? A. No. Q. Now, when you acquired Belnortel ~- well, let me strike that. 14:42 Aiken Welch Court Reporters Gary McArthur 05-01-2014ono oOo aoa NN DO oO FF Ww NY = Mm NM MN NY YH &=& BSB B@B Ss Bs Fs SF Be Se = a B Oo ND |= GO OO ON ODO oO RF Ww DY = 82 Let's finish with the franchise agreements and then I'll ask you some more further questions -- I don't have any more questions on that map, and we'll attach Exhibit No. -- we'll attach it as Exhibit -- well, we'll attach a 14:42 smaller version as Exhibit No. 12. Going back to Exhibit No. 8, sir. So that territory that you had as part of Belnortel, Area 6, 7, and 8, they were exclusive; right? MS. MCCORMICK: Vague. Ambiguous. Calls 14:42 for speculation. THE WITNESS: They were supposed to he. BY MS. BOSCH: Q. But does that mean that there could not be any other franchisee of ABC Mobile Systems selling 14:42 services within your territory? MS. MCCORMICK: Vague. Ambiguous. Overbroad. THE WITNESS: That's what it was supposed to mean, but that's not what happened. 14:43 BY MS. BOSCH: Q. What happened, sir? A. There were other mobile brake trucks that came into the area. Q. Were they ABC Mobile Brake trucks? 14:43 Aiken Welch Court Reporters Gary McArthur 05-01-20140 Oo ON OD oO B® DO NY = MD MM HY YY B= w@ Ss Bw SB Ba se a Aa BF oO NY |= 30D oO DN DOD aA FW DY = A. On a couple of occasions I know of, yes, and there was other -~ also other competition in -- in San Francisco itself. Q. But -- A. We weren't the only -- we weren't the only 14: mobile brake truck in town. Q. But the other mobile brake trucks in town, they were not called "ABC Mobile Brakes"; right? A. No. Correct. Q. They had different names? 14: A. Well, with the exception of, I believe it was somebody from down in the Peninsula area that used to come in to Ralph's territory, and Ralph became very incensed about that. Q. And Mr. L'Allier's -- Ralph is 14: Mr. L'Allier; right? A. Yes. Uh-huh. Q. And his territory was more the South San Francisco territory that went up into San Francisco; correct? 14:44 A. Yes. Q. But another ABC franchisee coming into Mr. L'Allier's territory, was that something that happened on a regular basis, or it just happened and he got upset and it stopped? 14:44 83 Aiken Welch Court Reporters Gary McArthur 05-01-2074oO © oa N DOW OO KR WwW DY = me MBM KY DY NY DN Ba Bs Be ew oo ow SB BAB Ba a a & WwW HH =A OD Oo A NHN DOD oO KR WW NY = The date is May 1, 2014, and the time is Back on the record. BY MS. BOSCH: Q. Six, prior to acquiring the company from Mr. Bell, Mr. L'Allier, and Pimentel, did you have any conversations with them about the vans that you were purchasing as part of Belnortel? MS. MCCORMICK: Vague. MR. HARTLEY: Vague and ambiguous. THE WITNESS: No. BY MS. BOSCH: Q@. Did you inspect the vans? MR. HARTLEY: Vague and ambiguous. THE WITNESS: No. BY MS. BOSCH: Q. How many vans did you acquire? A. I think three. Q@. Did you have any conversations with Mr. Bell, Mr. Pimentel, Mr. L'Allier about the equipment that was in the van? MS. MCCORMICK: Vague. THE WITNESS: No. BY MS. BOSCH: Q. Did you ask how old were the vans, for 103 Aiken Welch Court Reporters Gary McArthur 05-01-2014oo @OaN DO HW FF Ww NY = MD NM N NY DY |= =B= = SBS SB Be BSB Se | s a Bo NYS = 0 O© ON DW OD FF WwW NY = BY MS. BOSCH: Q. Do you know, did he give you a sense of how old the vans were? MS. MCCORMICK: Asked and answered. Vague. 15:24 THE WITNESS: Yeah. They were early model Dodges. BY MS. BOSCH: Q. Do you remember the model year? No. But I would say early -- I'd say in 19:24 the early '70s. Q. De you have any information that the vans that you obtained from Belnortel were the vans that Belnortel operated from the time that the company was founded in 1971? 15:25 MR. HARTLEY: Objection. Calls for speculation. Vague and ambiguous. Overbroad. THE WITNESS: I don't know. BY MS. BOSCH: Q@. Mr. Norris didn't give you any information 15:25 about that? A. He could have, but I don't remember. Q. Do you know if the equipment that was in the vans was the equipment that was installed when Mr. Bell and Mr. L'Allier purchased the franchises 15:25 105 Aiken Welch Court Reporters Gary McArthur 05-01-2014oOo 0 ON ODO oO FF WOW DY = mn BM NY BH MY DB |S Ba sw Bw Bw we ww OR OR a F WO NHN = 0D oO OD Nn DOD TO BW NY = or got into franchise agreements with ABC Mobile Systems? MR. HARTLEY: Calls for speculation. Vague and ambiguous. Vague and overbroad. THE WITNESS: I don't know. BY MS. BOSCH: Q. Bo you know, did Mr. Norris ever have any conversations with you about how old the equipment was in the vans -- MR. HARTLEY: Same. BY MS. BOSCH: Q. -- that you were purchasing? MR. HARTLEY: Same objections. THE WITNESS: No. MR. BROWNFIELD: Same objections. And lacks foundation. BY MS. BOSCH: Q. Did you discuss with Mr. Norris whether you would need to replace the equipment that was in the vans because they were old? MR. HARTLEY: Vague. Ambiguous. And overbroad. Calls for speculation. MS. MCCORMICK: Asked and answered. THE WITNESS: No. BY MS. BOSCH: 15:25 15:25 15:26 15:26 15:26 106 Aiken Welch Court Reporters Gary McArthur 05-01-2014= Co Oo OA N Do kF WwW NY Q. Was it your understanding that the equipment was such that you could continue to use it, the equipment that was in the vans? MR. HARTLEY: Vague. Ambiguous. And overbroad. Calls for speculation. BY MS. Q.- THE WITNESS: Yes. BOSCH: Did you ask any questions when you purchased Belnortel about how long that equipment had been in the vans? BY MS. Q. MS. MCCORMICK: Asked and answered. THE WITNESS: No. BOSCH: Now, when you purchased Belnortel, what was your responsibility with the company? What was your title? BY MS. Q. A. Q. MS. MCCORMICK: Asked and answered. THE WITNESS: With what company? BOSCH: Belnortel. Oh. I was president. And what was your responsibility as president of the company? A. Q. Oversee the operation. On a day-to-day basis, what does that 107 15:26 15:26 15:26 15:27 15:27 Aiken Welch Court Reporters Gary McArthur 05-01-2014bk WO N oo ON OOM knowledge, we didn't go out and purchase a whole bunch of equipment at one time. BY MS. BOSCH: Q. Let me ask you a more specific question. A. Okay. 15:33 Q. Did you purchase new brake grinders for the three vans that you operated in San Francisco between 1978 and 1980? MR. HARTLEY: Vague and ambiguous. Calls for speculation. 15:33 THE WITNESS: I don't remember. BY MS. BOSCH: Q. Now, just so we have a clear record, can you, one more time, tell me the brand name of the brake grinders that were at the back of the 15:33 three -- well, let me strike that and ask. Was there a brake grinder in each of the three vans that you operated? A. Yes, there was. Q. Was it the same brake grinder in each of 15:34 -- well, was it the same brand of brake grinders in each of the three vans that you operated? A. Yes. MR. HARTLEY: Calls for speculation. Vague and ambiguous. 15:34 113 Aiken Welch Court Reporters Gary McArthur 05-01-2014= oO 0 ON ODO TH F WwW NH 114 BY MS. BOSCH: Q@. And can you tell me the brand name of the brake grinders that you had in the back of those three vans that you operated? MR. HARTLEY: Same. Same objections. 15:34 THE WITNESS: Barrett. BY MS. BOSCH: Q. How about the drum lathes, were there drum lathes in each of the vans? A. Yes. 15:34 Q. And was it the same brand of drum lathes in each of the vans? A. I believe so. Q. And can you tell me the brand name of the drum lathes in each of the vans? 15:34 A. They were Barrett. Q. And these were the equipment that you acquired when you acquired the vans as part of Belnortel; right? A. Correct. 15:34 Q. Now, since we are on the subject of the brake grinders, you told me they were red? A. Yeah. Q. -- before? Right. Do you recall if they were 15:35 Aiken Welch Court Reporters Gary McArthur 05-01-2014Ny = oo ON OD TO Fk Ww equipped with any dust collection equipment? A. Absolutely. Q. Can you describe for me what that dust collection equipment was? MS. MCCORMICK: Vague. Calis for a 15:35 narrative. THE WITNESS: It was a dust collection bag that connected to the grinder, and it was operated on the vacuum that was created by the grinding process. 15:35 BY MS. BOSCH: Q. And by that you mean when the -- the brake grinder consisted of -- of a cylinder that had a grinding surface on it; right? MS. MCCORMICK: Leading. 15:35 MR. HARTLEY: Vague and ambiguous. THE WITNESS: It had a upright wheel, metal wheel, that a grinding disc attached to. BY MS. BOSCH: Q. And the grinding disc came in contact with 15:36 the brake shoe? A. Yes. @. And that -- and that contact was grinding the brake shoe; right? A. Right. 15:36 115 Aiken Welch Court Reporters Gary McArthur 05-01-2014oo ODN Oo oO RF WO NY = NM MY HY NY HY |= & B= SB SB Ba we SB a a a BF wo NY = OC O© WA NN DO a fF WO N = Q. And when you said there was a vacuum, was it the centrifugal force that was propelling the disc that that was pulling the dust into the dust bag; is that what you mean, sir? MR. HARTLEY: Vague and ambiguous. MS. MCCORMICK: Vague. THE WITNESS: If I remember correctly, there were veins on the back side of that wheel, and they created the vacuum. I ~-- don't take me a hundred percent on that, but that's what I believe. BY MS. BOSCH: Q. Now, that dust collection system you said was a bag. Do you remember what it was made of, that bag? A. ft was some type of a heavy-duty cloth material. I don't know what kind of material, but it was -- if you're getting to the point that, was it porous, it wasn’t porous. Q. Was it a disposable bag? A. No. MR. HARTLEY: Vague and ambiguous. BY MS. BOSCH: Q. So the bags had to be emptied; right? A. Yes. 15:36 15:36 15:37 15:37 116 Aiken Welch Court Reporters Gary McArthur 05-01-2014oo Oa N Oo BF WOW NY mM MN NH NY KH = BSB |= SB Se ! SF BSB BSF Ss a fF OW NH 3= FG 0 ODN DO OF FF WwW NH = 158 Q. And, in fact, you don't know whether the photograph -- the grinders in Exhibit 7 or Exhibit 8 were actually used on brakes; correct? A. I have no idea. They could have been. Maybe not. 16:32 Q. But you have no idea? A. No, I have no idea. Q. Can you tell me whether the grinder that is depicted -- that is shown in Exhibit 7 is the same one that is shown in Exhibit 8? 16:32 A. Certainly doesn't look like it. Q. If you could hand me back Exhibit 7. Focusing on Exhibit &. A. Okay. Q. Do you have any idea the vintage of the 16:32 grinder depicted in Exhibit 8? A. No. Other than the fact that they were in use when we bought the Sacramento operation. Q. Do you have any idea of the model number of that grinder? 16:32 A. Actually, no. I saw it on another picture, though. Q. Okay. A. On that label. Q. All right. We're going to come to that. 16:32 Aiken Welch Court Reporters Gary McArthur 05-01-2014oo wma NO oO kB WN = My MM HY NY B= = |= Be Be Fe see a 8B © NY = 0 © ON DO oO FF WYN = A, Okay. Q. Now, is that grinder, does that look the -- the same as grinders that were in the back of the San Francisco vans? A. Yes. 16:33 Q. Do you have any -~ let me hand you back briefly. Do you have any -- do you have any quarrel estimating that the vintage of that grinder is in the 1970s? 16:33 MS. BOSCH: Lacks foundation. Calis for speculation. THE WITNESS: I didn't quite understand. BY MR. HARTLEY: Q. Sure. Would you have any disagreement 16:33 with the proposition that the vintage of that grinder depicted in Exhibit 8 is from the 1970s? MS. BOSCH: Lacks foundation. Calls for speculation. THE WITNESS: I would think that it is 16:33 from the '70s. That's when I first started using them. BY MR. HARTLEY: Q. All right. Thank you. Handing you Exhibit 14, I believe that was 16:34 159 Aiken Welch Court Reporters Gary McArthur 05-01-2014np = oo wan Oo oO Fk WwW the plate or label that you were familiar with? A. Yeah. B-75. Q. Do you know whether that plate was on either the grinder that's in Exhibit 7 or Exhibit 8? A. Well, I recognize it as being on the grinder that was in Exhibit 8. Q. Okay. But do you see anywhere 8 where there's the nameplate? A. No. It's gone. on Exhibit Q. But, as you sit here, you don't know whether the photograph that's depicted in Exhibit 14 was taken from Exhibit 8 or Exhibit 7? MS. BOSCH: Lacks foundation. speculation. THE WITNESS: No idea. BY MR. HARTLEY: Q. You just have no idea? A. Right. Q. Okay. Very good. Thank you. You said that in San Francisco was competition. A. Yes. Q. Okay. There were other mobile entities? Calls for that there brake 160 16:34 16:34 16:35 16:35 16:35 Aiken Welch Court Reporters Gary McArthur 05-01-2014oo WN Oo oO B&B Ww nN = my NN NY NY Kw SF = |] Ss ses Ss se = sa a B oN & COC O© wa nN DOD oO BW NY = A. Yes. Q. Okay. And you included within that other franchisees of ABC; is that correct? MS. BOSCH: Misstates testimony. BY MR. HARTLEY: 16:35 Q. Or did you? A. I said that there were occasions that we were quite sure that other franchisees had come into the territory. Q. And in the deposition you gave in the 16:35 Scott case, you referred to that as poaching? Okay. A Q. Do you remember that? A Yeah. Sure. Q But that's what you considered it to be; 16:36 A. Yeah. Q. And that was upsetting because you thought you had a territory and here you had anecdotal evidence that other franchisees were coming into 16:36 your territory? A. Yes. Q. All right. And that was -- that included all three territories; right? MS. BOSCH: Lacks foundation. Calls for 16:36 161 Aiken Welch Court Reporters Gary McArthur 05-01-2014olUhwOmlUlUCOULUN UDO BN Dy MN DY YY DK | B= B Bw SB SB Aa Ba a Ss a BF wo NY = 0 0 oO VN DW oO FF DO PS = speculation. Misstates testimony. BY MR. HARTLEY: Q. In other words, were you concerned about poaching from -- MS. BOSCH: Counsel, there was no answer 16:36 to the previous question. MR. HARTLEY: Okay. I'm asking a different one now. MS. BOSCH: Well, are you striking the -- MR. HARTLEY: Fine. I'll strike the 16:36 question. MS. BOSCH: -- previous question? BY MR. HARTLEY: Q. Did you ever have an understanding ~~ or were you -- strike that. 16:36 Were you concerned that there was poaching going on in each of your San Francisco territories? MS. BOSCH: Misstates testimony. Lacks foundation. Calls for speculation. 16:36 THE WITNESS: I'm not sure if -- if we had people that were coming inte Downtown San Francisco. BY MR. HARTLEY: Q. Was that a concern during this time? 16:37 162 Aiken Welch Court Reporters Gary McArthur 05-01-2014oa Oo oOo oO N ODO oO FF O DN 163 A. It was a concern, of course. Q@. All right. And do you remember the names, again, non-ABC franchisees, ckay? Well, strike that. When you had the San Francisco operation, 16:37 did you understand there to be ABC franchisees in Oakland? A. Yes. Q. Other parts of Alameda County? A. Yes. 16:37 Q. San Mateo County? A. Yes. Marin County? Marin County, yes. oF © Would you be able to give me an estimate, 16:37 again, during the four years you had the San Francisco routes, approximately how many ABC vans operated within a 50-mile radius of San Francisco? MS. BOSCH: Lacks foundation. Calis for 16:37 speculation. THE WITNESS: Off the top of my head, I'd say probably at least 50. BY MR. HARTLEY: Q. All right. So stretching it north into 16:37 Aiken Welch Court Reporters Gary McArthur 05-01-2014BR WO DN oclUcmwucOUmUlCCONMUMN UO Marin County? Q. » oO Pp oO Pp Oo FP Yes. East into Alameda County? Solano County. Okay. Down at San Mateo —~ San Mateo. ~- and even Santa Clara County? Right. Now, did you go outside your territory? Did you poach into anybody else's territory? A. In San Francisco? Q. Correct. A. No. Q. In other words, when you had the San Francisco operation, did you go to Oakland to do work? A. No. Q@. And you didn't go to San Mateo county; correct? A. No. Not to my knowledge. Q. But it wasn't the way you ran your business? A. No, it wasn't. Q. Now, do you remember the hames of any of the other mobile brake services that operated in 164 16:38 16:38 16:38 16:38 16:38 Aiken Welch Court Reporters Gary McArthur 05-01-2014= oo Oa NO oO Fk WY N there either. So. BY MR. HARTLEY: Q. And just tying that one off, too, there's been testimony in this case that the -- that a mobile brake service by the name of ABC came to the plaintiff's service station at 7th and Howard Street trucks, A. Q. in pickup trucks. Okay. And by "pickup " T mean open-ended. Right. I'm asking you to assume that. Would it be your opinion that that was not an ABC Mobile Brake Service? case. BY MR. Q. routes, MS. BOSCH: It misstates testimony in the THE WITNESS: I -- I never saw one. MR. HARTLEY: Very good. All right. HARTLEY: Now, when you had the San Francisco "78 to '82, did you know the brand and model number of the brake lathes and arc grinders or burnishers in the back of the ABC vans operating out of Marin County? A. Q. A. No. Oakland? No. 174 16:56 16:57 16:57 16:57 16:57 Aiken Welch Court Reporters Gary McArthur 05-01-2014= oo ON DO OHO ke wD ON 175 . Solano? . No. Contra Costa? No. Alameda County? 16:57 > Oo Pp Oo PF © I have no knowledge of what their equipment was. Q. Any place other than -— A. Other than San Prancisco and Sacramento. Q. All vight. Thank you. 16:57 I'm going to hand you what's been marked as Exhibit 15. T have my copy, but unfortunately I don't have one to share. I'm going to represent to you that it's a 16:58 document that's been produced in this case, and is identified -- it says on the face, "FMC Bean brake Service Equipment." Do you see that? A. I see "Bean" -- yeah. Uh-huh. Q. Could you -- if I could ask you to take a 16:58 moment to look through that and let me know if you've ever seen this particular document before. MS. MCCORMICK: You mean the original of the copy? MR. HARTLEY: Correct. Correct. 16:58 Aiken Welch Court Reporters Gary McArthur 05-01-2014oo Oo aoa N OD oO FF BH NY = mM NM NY YB HB NYO =& Be Be Ba wow BSB Ba Ba BS mr a BP wns = O09 OO DN OW TO FF BO YN = A. And a burnisher. Q. And a burnisher? A. Yes. Q. f'1ll ask you to look at page 21, please. Do you see that page at the top that’s titled "Model B-375 shoe grinder”? A. Uh-huh. Q@. Does that look like the type of shoe grinder that was in the back of your vans? A. Uh-huh. MS. BOSCH: We need -- I'm sorry. You said "uh-huh." We need a "yes" or "no." THE WITNESS: Oh, yes. BY MR. HARTLEY: Q. That's a "yes." Okay. And the model B-375 is familiar? A. Familiar. Q. Okay. Now, I'm going to ask you to look at the wording that's below that, okay, and if you take a -- take a moment to read it, if you would, and I'm going to have questions about it, so if you would let me know when you're done. MS. BOSCH: May I take a lsok, Counsel? MR. HARTLEY: Certainly. MS. BOSCH: Thank you. 180 17:04 17:04 17:04 17:04 17:05 Aiken Welch Court Reporters Gary McArthur 05-01-2014oo ON oO a FF WO DY = yw MMH HY KR SF =e BF se Fee2a-zA a a 8B ON 32 0 oO ON DO oO FF WO DN BY MR. HARTLEY: Q. Okay. Have you -- have you read that? A. Yeah. Q. i'm going to direct your attention to the second paragraph, okay, which reads, and I'll read it into the record. "Built-in vacuum collects dust. You can chamfer lining ends and the exclusive angular size adjustment feature gives longer abrasive disc life. Micrometer adjustment dial and quick change controls heip make the B-375 shoe grinder a fast, easy-to-use piece of brake service equipment. Capacity 6 inches to 14-inch brake shoes.” Do you see that? BR. Uh-huh. MS. BOSCH: I'm sorry, but -- THE WITNESS: Yes. MS. BOSCH: I'm sorry, sir. I know it's getting late in the day, but I'm going to bother you each time you say "uh-huh," because we need a clear record. I apologize. BY MR. HARTLEY: @. And does that comport with your recollection of the features of the grinder that was in the back of the San Francisco vans? 17:05 17:06 17:06 17:06 17:06 181 Aiken Welch Court Reporters Gary McArthur 05-01-2014olclUcOmlUlUCUCOUN UO BON mo me NM BH HDB NHB HF S| S| SF FE Fe SF Fe S| |= a BF ON 3S 5 © ON DAR ONY BS A. Q. Yes. And you've used the word earlier today, and you did in the Scott deposition, of “vacuum.” A. Q. Yes. Right? How was your -- and was it your understanding or your impression having used these machines, that it was a designed vacuum, in other words, that the grinder was designed to vacuum up dust? MS. BOSCH: Lacks foundation. Calls for speculation. THE WITNESS: Yes. BY MR. HARTLEY: Q. All right. And so is it your -- would it be your testimony that each of the burnishers or grinders that were in the back of the San Francisco vans had vacuums? A. Yes. MS. BOSCH: I'm sorry. That's vague and ambiguous. BY MR. HARTLEY: What does "chamfer" mean, c-h-a-m-f-e-r? A. That's "chamfer." Chamfer, okay. A. They bevel the leading edge of the brake 182 17:06 17:07 17:07 17:07 17:07 Aiken Welch Court Reporters Gary McArthur 05-01-2014oo aN OW oO Fk OW NHN = mw MN BN KH |= SF = Ss SF Fe seeosee_ a B oOo NS = 0 © @ NOD aA FF WwW NY = shoe so the edge, the 90-degree edge, doesn't make contact with the drum initially. In other words, they bevel it like that so the shoe -- as the shoe comes out, it makes smoother contact with the brake drum. Q. So now, looking at the picture that's on page 21, do you see the -- the black portion to the left of it? A. Yes. Q. What do you understand that to be? A. The black portion down below? Q. No. To the left. A. Yeah. Q. To the left. Upper left? A. Oh, up here? Q. Yes. A. That's a motor. Q@. All right. Did the vans have their own independent source of power, or did you plug in? A. We plugged into the stations. Q. So looking at this picture —— actually, I'm going to ask you to hold it up, okay, so we can frame it in the camera. A. Oh, okay. MR. HARTLEY: Got that? 17:07 17:07 17:08 17:08 17:08 183 Aiken Welch Court Reporters Gary McArthur 05-01-2014oo ON ODO oO BF WwW NY = My MW NY HY HY NY |= Bs Bs BB SB Ba we Ba a me a fF © NY = 0 O06 DOD N DOD HD FF WO NH = 189 process? A. Absolutely. Q. Okay. MR. HARTLEY: Are there still people on the phone? 17:15 MR. BROWNFIELD: Yeah. We're still here. MR. HARTLEY: Okay. Thanks. See? They're just in rapt attention. THE WITNESS: I thought they had stepped out for a cocktail. 17:15 BY MR. HARTLEY: Q. Now, you mentioned that there were -- what was your term -- in the back -- bear with me one second here. Do you know what an impeller is? 17:15 A. Yes. Q. Were there impellers on the B-375 grinder that you noticed? A. I never had one apart. MS. MCCORMICK: Hi. Somebody forgot to 17:15 turn their mute button back on when we asked for a roll. Thanks. BY MR. HARTLEY: Q@. I'm sorry. Bear with me. Oh, you mentioned earlier today that there 17:16 Aiken Welch Court Reporters Gary McArthur 05-01-2014Co Oo ao NO oO FF WO HH = yh mM NH YN B= Bs ses Ba se Se Be Ba Bw OS a BB oO YD = OC O© DA NN DOD Oa FW NH = were what you called "veins." A. Right. Q. -- that created the vacuum effect. A. And that's the same as an impeller. Yeah. Q. All right. A. But I -- I never took one apart to see it, but I could feel them. Q. Okay. So, looking at page 21 of the catalogue, Exhibit 15, okay? That's the one. A. Okay. Q@. Can you tell me where the veins were on this model of brake shoe grinder? A. They were on the back side of the grinding wheel (indicating). As far as I knew, they were an integral part of the wheel. I mean, it was all a casting, and I think it was -- that's why I never took one apart because it was kind of intricate and I never had a need to take one apart. Q. But you knew, even without taking them -— taking one apart, you knew that the veins were integral to creating the vacuum effect when the grinding wheel is turning? MS. BOSCH: Lacks foundation. Calis for speculation. 17:16 17:16 17:16 L717 17:17 190 Aiken Welch Court Reporters Gary McArthur 05-01-2014= oO ODN OOH Re WY NN THE WITNESS: It could not -- it couldn't function any differently. That was the only way it would work. BY MR. HARTLEY: Q. And that's based on your experience of using these things; right? A. Right. Okay. MR. HARTLEY: Mark this, please. THE WITNESS: Are you through with the book? MR. HARTLEY: Yes, for now. Thank you. MS. MCCORMICK: Is this an extra copy? MR. HARTLEY: It is the only copy. (Whereupon, Exhibit 16 was marked for Identification.) BY MR. HARTLEY: Q. Mr. Norris -- I'm sorry. Myr. McArthur, I'm going to hand you what's been marked as Exhibit 16. If you could just take a moment to gander through that and let me know if you have ever seen this document or the original of it before. A. No. MS. BOSCH: I'm going to object that any 17:17 17:18 17:18 17:18 17:18 191 Aiken Welch Court Reporters Gary McArthur 05-01-2014oO oN DOD oO RB WwW NM MM NO NH NY YH NY = BSB B= SB wm Be oa a oe a a FB © NY = 9 G&G ON DW OD FF Ww NH = questions on ~-- based on the document lacks foundation -- MR. HARTLEY: Sure. MS. BOSCH: -- calls for speculation. BY MR. HARTLEY: Q. At the top of this, it has -- carries a date of July 30, 1968. Do you see that? A. Yes. Q. Okay. And to the right of it, it says "3,394,500." Do you see that? A. Patent number. Q. Do you know what a patent is, generally? A. Yes. Uh-huh. Q. I'm going to ask you -- I just want to look at the -- look at Figure 1, the face page of it, okay? A. Okay. Q. And I'm going to represent to you that this was a patent issued duly 30, 1968, to Melvin H. Lili," L-i-1-1," "Okemos," O-k-e-m-o-s; “and Weldon B. EBllege, E-l-l-e-g-e, Lansing, Michigan, assignors to FMC Corporation, San Jose, California." MS. BOSCH: Move to strike colloquy of counsel. Assumes facts. 192 17:18 17:19 17:19 17:19 17:20 Aiken Welch Court Reporters Gary McArthur 05-01-2014oD 0 aoa nN ODO oO FF WwW YP = Dy NM Nw KB KY NY |= = = Se Fs Ft SF fF fF Fs a & OO NY = CG O© AN DO aA FF WO NY = 193 MR. HARTLEY: Sure. BY MR. HARTLEY: Q. Looking at Figure 1, the first page, do you see the -- what looks like a wheel? A. Yes. 17:20 Q. Okay. And in the -- handing you back the catalogue -- sorry, I wasn't done with it, page 21. A. Okay. Q. You'll see that the B-375 grinder has a 17:20 wheel-type assembly. Do you see that? A. Yes. Q@. And then, again, going back to the patent, Exhibit 17 -- 16, okay? You'll see that there is a lever or a handle protruding perpendicularly 17:20 from the wheel? A. Yes. Q. And you see the model B-375 in Exhibit 15 that there is a similar device? A. Right. 17:21 Q. Okay. In the front of the patent, you see that there is a -- a scale that runs from 6 to 14? A. Yes. Q@. Do you see that? A. Uh-huh. 17:21 Aiken Welch Court Reporters Gary McArthur 05-01-2014—~ oOo ON OOH FF WOW DN Q@. And do you see on the model in Exhibit 15 in the catalogue that there is a similar scale? A. Yes. Q. Shown in the front? A. Right. Q@. And you saw where in the description of the model that it could handle brake shoes from 6 to 14 inches? A. Right. Q@. And you see in the patent there, Figure 1, that this scale here ranges from 6 to 14? A. Right. Q. Okay. All right. And then do you see in the middle -- well, strike that. To the right looking at the Figure 1 in the patent, that there is a -- a dial, or a knob? A. Yes. @. And then do you see a similar dial or knob in the photograph that's in the catalogue? A. Yes. Q. Okay. And then right above that, there is another handle that looks a part of a unit that could turn the brake shoe from side to side? A. Yes. Q. And you see a similar device? 17:22 17:21 17:21 17:22 17:22 194 Aiken Welch Court Reporters Gary McArthur 05-01-2014= oo ON OO FF WwW NY 195 A. Yes. Q. Okay. All right. Thank you. That's all I have for those. Now, you mentioned earlier in your testimony today something along the lines of 17:22 things other than brakes that was apparently used with the grinder. You mentioned an anvil. A. Yes. Q Do you remember that? A Right. 17:23 Q. What did you mean by that? A I mean people that were using the equipment could be very careless. They could put a brake shoe on -- on that piece of equipment to knock a pivot pin out of a shoe, something like 17:23 that. Q. Okay. A. I mean, if they could figure out a way of destroying things they did. Q. Okay. So by that did you mean that the -- 17:23 that some of the employees used the grinder on things other than brakes? A. No. MS. MCCORMICK: Misstates facts. MS. BOSCH: Misstates testimony. 17:23 Aiken Welch Court Reporters Gary McArthur 05-01-2014a oo ODN ODO oO RF WO YN MR. HARTLEY: Okay. Let me look at my notes real quick. BY MR. HARTLEY: Q. You also mentioned earlier in your testimony words to the effect that every time an ABC Mobile van went to somebody's station or repair shop, they didn't grind brakes. A. That's right. MS. BOSCH: I'm sorry. It's vague and ambiguous. Misstates the testimony. BY MR. HARTLEY: Q. So I'm asking you. Every time that it -- during -- again, during the time you had the San Francisco routes, every time that an ABC Mobile van was dispatched someplace, was it always -- did that service always include grinding brakes? A. No. MS. MCCORMICK: Vague. Overbroad. MS. BOSCH: Asked and answered. BY MR. HARTLEY: Q. Sometimes it could just be for turning rotors? A Or Q Or? 196 17:24 17:24 17:24 17:24 17:25 Aiken Welch Court Reporters Gary McArthur 05-01-2014oO Oo ON ODO oOo fF Ww NY = mM NM NH LH NY KH | = Bw SB SB SB BA BRB Sw a fF Ww NY =~ CO Oo wa nN DOD oO FF W DY = 197 A. It could be just supplying parts. Q. Is there any way for you to estimate for me in any scale meaningful to you during the four years you had the San Francisco routes, what proportion of the service calls that ABC made that 17:25 did not include burnishing or grinding brakes? MS. MCCORMICK: Vague. Overbroad. MS. BOSCH: Lacks foundation. Calis for speculation, THE WITNESS: I don't know. 17:25 MS. BOSCH: And overbroad as to time. BY MR. HARTLEY: Q. Just no way to estimate? A. No. Q@. All right. Fair enough. Fair enough. 17:25 When you cleaned out the back of the vans at night, you mentioned earlier that you cleaned up metal shavings; correct? A. Uh-huh. Right. Q@. And those were from the drums or rotors; 17:25 correct? A. Right. Uh-huh. Q. Did the lathe have some type of a collection device for those metal shavings? A. No. 17:26 Aiken Welch Court Reporters Gary McArthur 05-01-2014oO Oo OD NN OO oO F&F WOW NY = mM Nw Nw BH KY HB | & —w BSB SB Ba Ba Bw Bw ow a BF wo NH = OF O© WA NN DO oO F&F W HY = 217 parts? A. Not to my knowledge. MR. TAVERA: Thank you, sir. I don't have any further questions. THE WITNESS: Okay. 17:49 MS. BOSCH: Looking for the page. EXAMINATION BY MS. BOSCH: Q. Sir, I'm going to hand over to you Exhibit 15, very briefly, the picture of the brake grinder that you were discussing earlier on, and when you 17:50 were being asked questions by counsel, you indicated that you first started using the grinder that's depicted on Exhibit 15 in the 1970s. A. Uh-huh. Q. And my question is simply, sir, do you 17:50 recall using this brake grinder when you started in the mobile brake business at Throwbot in 1972? A. Yes, we did. Q. That's all I have here. A. That's it? L7:$1 Q. Going back to the poaching issues that you discussed, the poaching issues -- sorry if I mispronounce that. A. Oh, poaching, yes. @. Did you ever see an ABC Mobile Brake truck 17:51 Aiken Welch Court Reporters Gary McArthur 05-01-2014= oOo ©e© oO Nn DO oO BR WO DN that you knew to be from the Oakland franchises in your territory? MR. HARTLEY: Calis for speculation. THE WITNESS: No. BY MS. BOSCH: Q. Did you ever see an ABC Mobile truck that you knew to be from Alameda in your territory? MR. HARTLEY: Same. THE WITNESS: No. BY MS. BOSCH: Q. Did you ever see an ABC Mobile truck that you knew to be from Marin County in your territory? MR. HARTLEY: Same objection. THE WITNESS: I didn't see any, but I had drivers that did. BY MS. BOSCH: Q. And what did your drivers report? A. One of the drivers was a fellow from Oakland. I think his name was Raymond Chin, and he used to drive back and forth across the bridge. Quite regularly from what I understand. But I never saw him. Q. So you don't know for a fact? A. I don't know for a fact. 17:51 17:51 17:52 17:52 218 Aiken Welch Court Reporters Gary McArthur 05-01-2014oO ODN ODO OO F&F WwW NY NM NY YP KY DN ww wm B BSB Bw BOB SB SB BS a ao FW NH = 90D 0 OD NN DW oO FF WYO ND = Q. Now, do you remember your phone number when you had Belnortel, by any chance? A. Q. A. Q. No. Now -- That was in the Scott thing also. Now, one of the advantages of using the ABC Mobile service is that you were very fast to respond to a call; right? A. Q. Right. So if a service station had a customer pull in, they wanted new brakes, they could call you, and very quickly you would be there, they could turn around that brake job for that customer very quickly; right? A. Q. That's what we tried to do, yes. So it didn't make sense for somebody from San Francisco to call somebody in Gakliand to come and deliver the parts; right? MR. HARTLEY: Calls for speculation. MS. MCCORMICK: Vague. MR. BROWNFIELD: Yeah. Lacks foundation. Overbroad. Vague. THE WITNESS: I -- it -- the bridge is enly 15 minutes; right? BY MS. BOSCH: 219 17:52 17:52 17:53 17:53 17:53 Aiken Welch Court Reporters Gary McArthur 05-01-2014= oO OWN OOO FF YO NH 220 Q. Yeah, But there is traffic and that bridge gets back up, you'll agree with me? A. In the 1970s, it wasn't that bad. Q. Does it make more sense to call somebody who is a mile away than calling somebody who is 15 17:53 miles and a bridge away? MR. HARTLEY: Calis for speculation. MS. MCCORMICK: Vague. THE WITNESS: It makes more sense to call somebody locally, but there were people that were 17:53 friends of somebody that worked somewhere else, and they kept that friendship going by waiting a little longer. BY MS. BOSCH: Q. And, if somebody had the phone number for 17:54 the ABC Mobile franchise in San Francisco, that number didn't ring in Marin, Oakland, Alameda, or San Mateo; right? MR. HARTLEY: Calls for speculation. THE WITNESS: At one time everybody called 17:54 into Oakland. BY MS. BOSCH: Q@. Do you know when that was? MR. HARTLEY: Withdraw. THE WITNESS: That I don't know. It was 17:54 Aiken Welch Court Reporters Gary McArthur 05-01-2014= oOo oC ON DO a fF WwW DN before I showed up. BY MS. BOSCH: Q. That was before 1972; right? A. I don't know. Q. That was before the Mobile Brake Systems franchise -~ or the Mobile Breke Systems -- strike that. That was before -- that was before -—- A. I know what you're talking about. Q. I'll strike that again. That was before ABC Mobile Systems took over ABC -- or, no, I'm sorry -- A. Yeah. Yeah. Probably. Q. You know. A. Probably. Q. The companies sound all the same, so I apologize. But what I meant is before they took over Associated Brake Company. A. Right. Q. So, when the company was Associated Brake Company, they had one location which was in Oakland and the phone rang in Oakland; right? A. That was my understanding, yes. Q. But after ABC Mobile Systems took over and different franchises were started in different 221 Aiken Welch Court Reporters Gary McArthur 05-01-2014oo ON DOD He WOW BR = Oo MD NM NY NY KY | B= @B se SB Be Ba ew Ba ew a FB oO NY |= OO oO© O29 NN DO oO F OW NY = counties, that ceased; right? A. I don't know -- MR. HARTLEY: Calis for speculation. THE WITNESS: I don't know as it ceased completely because they had mobile radios in the 17:55 trucks. So they could be dispatched from Oakland and they could be in San Jose. BY MS. BOSCH: Q. Now, your business was at 158 Fell; that's BA. 159. Q@. 159. TI apologize. A Uh-huh. Q. And Mr. Koepke's service station was at 7th and Howard. That was about within a mile of 17:55 your warehouse; right? A. I don't know. Is it? Really, I don't know, Q. That's fine, sir. Now, did you ever see the grinder in the back of the van of the person 17:56 who had a business in the avenues? You'd mentioned a competitor. A. Yes. But I -- no, I never saw it. Q. So you don't know what he had in the back of his van? 17:56 222 Aiken Welch Court Reporters Gary McArthur 05-01-20148 : § a e a 4 & 2 é a i 3 Z H ud Hi j 510) 302-4000 + Fax: G10) 835-4913 + sww.damnlaw.com oO BW DW RY wD om tg we YN AH AG BH 2S 55208184 Mar 26 2044 Joseph Satterley, Esq. (C.S.B. # 286890} JSatterley@kazanlaw.com Carole Bosch, Esq. (C.S.B. #239790} CBosch@kazanlaw.com KAZAN, McCLAIN, SATTERLEY & GREENWOOD A Professional Law Corporation Jack London Market 55 Harrison Street, Suite 400 Oakland, California 94607 Telephone: (510) 302-1000 Facsimile: (510) 835-4913 Attorneys for Plaintiffs SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO HAROLD KOEPKE and NANCY KARIDIS- | Case No. CGC13276217 KOEPKE, NOTICE OF DEPOSITION AND NOTICE Plaintiffs, OF INTENT TO VIDEOTAPE DEPOSITION OF DEFENDANT vs. BELNORTEL CORPORATION'S PERSON(S) MOST QUALIFIED FORD MOTOR COMPANY, et al., Date: April 7, 2014 Defendants. Time: 10:00 a.m. Location: Kazan, McClain, Satterley & Greenwood 55 Harrison Street, Suite 400 Oakland, California 94607 TO DEFENDANTS HEREIN AND TO THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD: PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that plaintiffs, through their counsel, will take the deposition of defendant BELNORTEL CORPORATION through its person(s) who is most qualified to testify about one or mare of the matters set forth below at 10:00 a.m. on April 7, 2014, at the law offices of Kazan, McClain, Satterley & Greenwood, Jack London Market, 55 Harrison Street, Suite 400, Oakland, California, 94607. ‘The deposition will be taken before a duly authorized Notary Public and shail continue from day io day thereafter, until completed. Said deposition may be videotaped pursuant to C.C.P. §§ 2025.220(a)(5), 2025,330(c} and 2025.340. Plaintiffs reserve the right to pse the videotaped depositions at trial pursuant to provisions of C.C.P. §§ 2025,220(a)(6) and 2625.620. In addition, the deposition testimony will 4300308.1 j NOTICE OF DEPOSITION AND NOTICE OF INTENT TO VIDEOTAPE DEPOSITION OF DEFENDANT BELNORTEL CORPORATION'S PERSON(S} MOST OUALIFIEDKazan, McClain, Satterley & Greenwood A Brofessioaal Law Corporation + 55 Harriton Street, Suite 400 + Oakland, California 94607 Jack Londen Market + wnww kazanlaw.cone (10) 302-2000 + Fax: G10) 835-4913, be recorded stenographically, and/or through instant visual display pursuant to C.C.P. § 2025.220(a)(5) The deponent, defendant BELNORTEL CORPORATION, is not a natural person and therefore required, pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure § 2025,230 to designated its “Person(s) Most Qualified” to testify regarding each of the matters set forth below. CATEGORY NO. 1, All information relating to YOUR RECORD RETENTION POLICY. Use of “and,” “or,” and the singular form of words: Throughout this document, the singular form of a word such as “any” sha!! be interpreted in the plural and singular; and the words “and” and “or” shall be construed inclusively to bring within the scope of these requests all documents and information that might otherwise be consirned to be outside of their scope. Use of year designations: Throughout this document, ihe use of year references shall be inclusive. For example: “1948-1995” shall include January 1, 1948 and each day through December 31, 1995. “YOU”, “YOUR” and “YOURS” shall refer to defendant Belnorte! Corporation dba A.B.C. Mobile Brake of San Francisco, and to ifs attorneys, agents, employees, officers, parent entities, predecessors, subsidiaries, divisions, and contract units. “RECORD RETENTION POLICY(IESY’ shail refer to any policy, formal or informal, pursuant to which defendant’s DOCUMENTS are maintained or destroyed, including the legal and financial basis for deciding how long to retain documents, the period of time required and what caiegories of documents are subject to defendant’s document retention policy. “DOCUMENTS” shall mean all writings, as defined in California Evidence Code § 250, including without limitation: all originals and all duplicates of handwriting, typewriting, printing, photostats, photographs, electronic data on any of YOUR computers, facsimile, e-mail, and every other means of recording upon any tangible thing or cther form of communication or representation. CATEGORY NO. 2. All information relating to YOUR AGREEMENT(S) with A.B.C. MOBILE SYSTEMS. “AGREEMENT” shall mean agreement, franchise agreement, contract, lease, 1300308.1 2 “NOTICE OF DEPOSITION AND NOTICE OF IN VIDEOTAPE DEPOSITION OF DEFENDANT BELNORTEL CORPORAT! Hon $ PERSON(S) MOST OUALIFIEDKazan, McClain, Satterley & Greenwood A Professional Law Corporation + 35 Hamison Street, Suite 400 + Oakland, California 94607 Jack Loadon Marker + Fax: (520) 835-4913 + wow kazanlaw.com (St0) 302-2000 Oo mR DAH Bw w 10 understanding, deal, obligation, promise. “A.B.C. MOBILE SYSTEMS?” shall refer inclusively to A.B.C. Mobile Systems, A.B.C. Mobile Brake Sales & Service, Inc., Associated Brake Co., Western States Brake Manufacturing, Inc., and Mutual Enterprises, Inc. and to their attorneys, agents, employces, officers, parent entities, predece