On December 23, 2013 a
Answer
was filed
involving a dispute between
Smith Gallamore, Katherine Marie Cannon, Katherine Marie,
and
Cannon, Leland David,
for (Title IV-D OAG Use Only) Enforcement
in the District Court of Montgomery County.
Preview
Received and E-Filed for Record
6/27/2016 12:23:08 PM
Barbara Gladden Adamick
District Clerk
Montgomery County, Texas
NOTICE: THIS DOCUMENT
CONTAINS SENSITIVE DATA
CAUSE NO. 13-12-13598
IN THE MATTER OF § IN THE DISTRICT COURT
THE MARRIAGE OF §
§
KATHERINE MARIE CANNON §
AND §
LELAND DAVID CANNON § MONTGOMERY COUNTY, TEXAS
§
AND IN THE INTEREST OF §
ALESSANDRIA CANNON, §
EVE CANNON, AND §
LELAND COOPER CANNON §
CHILDREN § 410th JUDICIAL DISTRICT
AMICUS ATTORNEY’s ORIGINAL ANSWER
TO THE HONORABLE K. MICHAEL MAYES:
Kristin Bays, Amicus Attorney for the Children (the “Children”), files this Original Answer,
and, in support, shows as follows:
General Denial
1. Pursuant to Rule 92 of the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure, Kristin Bays, Amicus Attorney
for the Children generally denies all of the allegations, and demands strict proof of each allegation.
Best Interest of Children
2. Amicus Attorney requests that the following factors be considered in determining the best
interest of the Children:
! the desires of the Children;
! the emotional and physical needs of the Children now and in the future;
! any emotional and physical danger to the Children now and in the future;
! the parenting ability of each person seeking managing conservatorship of the
Original Answer Page 1 of 3
Children;
! the programs available to assist each person seeking managing conservatorship of the
Children in promoting the best interest of the Children;
! the plans for the Children of each person seeking managing conservatorship of the
Children;
! the stability of the home of each person seeking managing conservatorship of the
Children;
! the acts or omissions of each person seeking managing conservatorship of the
Children; and
! any excuse for the acts or omissions of each person seeking managing
conservatorship of the Children.
Fees and Expenses
3. It was necessary to render services to represent the Children. The parties should be ordered
to pay reasonable fees and expenses, and judgment should be rendered against the parties and in
favor of the Amicus Attorney as to same.
CONCLUSION
4. Kristin Bays, Amicus Attorney for the Children, respectfully requests that the Court consider
the best interests of the Children, award fees and expenses to her, and that the Court grant to her such
other relief to which she may show herself justly entitled.
Respectfully submitted,
BAYS & BAYS
1503 Hailey
Conroe, Texas 77301
Phone: (936) 760-7670
Fax: (936) 760-7671
/s/ Kristin Bays
Kristin Bays
State Bar No. 00787914
kristin@baysandbays.com
AMICUS ATTORNEY FOR THE CHILDREN
Original Answer Page 2 of 3
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
This is to certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing Original Answer has been
delivered to the following counsel of record by eservice on June 27, 2016 pursuant to Texas Rules
of Civil Procedure 21 and 21a:
Jennifer Casey By Email jennifer@jcaseylawfirm.com
THE LAW OFFICE OF JENNIFER CASEY
9595 Six Pines Drive, Suite 8210
The Woodlands, Texas 77380
Dustan Neyland By Email dneyland@greconeyland.com
GRECO NEYLAND, PC
900 Rockmead, Suite 132
Kingwood, Texas 77339 /s/ Kristin Bays
Kristin Bays
Original Answer Page 3 of 3
Document Filed Date
June 27, 2016
Case Filing Date
December 23, 2013
Category
(Title IV-D OAG Use Only) Enforcement
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.