arrow left
arrow right
  • Koop vs Fire Insurance Exchange, dba Farmers Insurance Group Civil document preview
  • Koop vs Fire Insurance Exchange, dba Farmers Insurance Group Civil document preview
  • Koop vs Fire Insurance Exchange, dba Farmers Insurance Group Civil document preview
  • Koop vs Fire Insurance Exchange, dba Farmers Insurance Group Civil document preview
  • Koop vs Fire Insurance Exchange, dba Farmers Insurance Group Civil document preview
  • Koop vs Fire Insurance Exchange, dba Farmers Insurance Group Civil document preview
  • Koop vs Fire Insurance Exchange, dba Farmers Insurance Group Civil document preview
  • Koop vs Fire Insurance Exchange, dba Farmers Insurance Group Civil document preview
						
                                

Preview

1 Stacy M. Tucker (SBN 218942) stucker@kantorlaw.net 2 Jaclyn D. Conover (SBN 266749) 3 jconover@kantorlaw.net KANTOR & KANTOR LLP 4 19839 Nordhoff Street Northridge, California 91324 5 Telephone: (818) 886-2525 Facsimile: (818) 350-6272 6 7 Attorneys for Plaintiff, GARY KOOP 8 9 SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA 10 COUNTY OF SONOMA 11 12 GARY KOOP, CASE NO: SCV-266944 Northridge, California 91324 KANTOR & KANTOR LLP 13 19839 Nordhoff Street Plaintiffs, (818) 886 2525 14 PLAINTIFF’S REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL vs. NOTICE IN OPPOSITION TO MOTION 15 FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OR, FIRE INSURANCE EXCHANGE, dba ALTERNATIVELY, SUMMARY 16 FARMERS INSURANCE GROUP; BRIAN ADJUDICATION HUNSAKER, 17 [Filed concurrently with Plaintiff’s Opposition Defendants. to Motion for Summary Judgment, Plaintiff’s 18 Response to Separate Statement of Undisputed Facts, Evidence in Support of Opposition, 19 Declaration of Gary Koop, Declaration of Stacy M. Tucker, Declaration of Kenneth Bunger 20 21 Date: October 26, 2022 Time: 3:00 p.m. Dept: 19 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 PLAINTIFF’S REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE IN OPPOSITION TO MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OR, ALTERNATIVELY, SUMMARY ADJUDICATION 1 Pursuant to California Evidence Code Section 452 and/or 453, Plaintiff Gary Koop hereby 2 requests that the Court take judicial notice of the following public records, newspaper articles, 3 court rules, and Insurance Code section: 4 (1) The public record constituting the insurance agent license information for Brian Ross 5 Hunsaker, license no. 0687046, downloaded from the California Department of Insurance website 6 at https://cdicloud.insurance.ca.gov/cal/LicenseDetail on January 11, 2022, listing the entities for 7 which he is authorized to transact business, and attached as Exhibit A. 8 (2) “Rebuilding a Wine Country Home After Fire May Cost Way More Than Insurance 9 Provides, Architects Say,” The North Bay Business Journal (online edition), by Jeff Quackenbush, 10 October 20, 2017, found at https://www.northbaybusinessjournal.com/article/industry- 11 news/rebuilding-a-wine-country-home-after-fire-may-cost-way-more-than-insurance/ and attached 12 as Exhibit B. Northridge, California 91324 KANTOR & KANTOR LLP 13 (3) “Custom Build Sonoma County Homes for the Price of a Prefab,” The Press Democrat, 19839 Nordhoff Street (818) 886 2525 14 by Sofia Englund, April 12, 2016, found at 15 https://realestate.blogs.pressdemocrat.com/14615/custom-built-sonoma-county-homes-for-the- 16 price-of-a-prefab/, (see page 3), and attached as Exhibit C. 17 (4) The California Judicial Council’s Emergency Rule 9, effective on April 6, 2020, 18 attached as Exhibit D. 19 (5) California Insurance Code §2071, attached as Exhibit E. 20 (6) This Court’s February 2, 2022 Ruling on the Issues Submitted related to Fire Insurance 21 Exchange’s Motion for Summary Judgment, attached as Exhibit F 22 23 DATED: October 12, 2022 KANTOR & KANTOR, LLP 24 25 By: /s/ Stacy Monahan Tucker STACY MONAHAN TUCKER 26 Attorneys for Plaintiff Gary Koop 27 28 2 PLAINTIFF’S REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE IN OPPOSITION TO MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OR, ALTERNATIVELY, SUMMARY ADJUDICATION EXHIBIT A EXHIBIT A   Settings     License Individual Name Business Name Enforcement Number Search Search Actions  License Details  Print or Download License  Continuing Education  Glossary of Terms  Collapse All Information  The license status information shown below represents information taken from the California Department of Insurance (CDI) licensing database at the time of your inquiry. This information may not include items currently under review or may not have, as yet, been entered into CDI’s licensing database (e.g., continuing education hours quoted on Check a License may not reflect courses completed in the last 24 to 48 hours). Please scroll down to view. Check a License will also state concluded disciplinary actions against licensees. Complaints and ongoing investigations are confidential and, therefore, are not available. If an “Order” is listed on the licensee’s record below, review CDI’s Enforcement Action Documents web page to retrieve additional information. If you have any questions about the license information you retrieved, please see the most commonly asked questions in our License Questions and Answers section. If you need further assistance, please call CDI's Licensing Hotline at (800) 967-9331, or send an email to Producer Licensing Bureau. Please include your name, license number, email address and telephone number in all correspondence with CDI. Need Help? Name: HUNSAKER BRIAN ROSS License #: 0687046  License Type and/or Original Issue Status Expiration Qualification Date Status Date Date Accident and Health 01/29/1986 Active 01/29/1986 09/30/2023 Casualty Broker-Agent 09/23/1985 Active 09/23/1985 09/30/2023 Life-Only 01/29/1986 Active 01/29/1986 09/30/2023 Property Broker-Agent 09/23/1985 Active 09/23/1985 09/30/2023 Business Address: 8741 OLD REDWOOD HWY WINDSOR CA, 95492 Business Phone: Bond Information  Bond Amount Bond # Surety Company $10,000 FX - 152786 10216 - AMERICAN CONTRACTORS INDEMNITY COMPANY Company Appointments  This licensee is authorized to transact on behalf of the following insurers: Show 10 entries Search: Qualification Effective Date Qualification Effective Date AMERICAN MODERN HOME INSURANCE COMPANY Casualty Broker-Agent 08/30/2018 Property Broker-Agent 08/30/2018 AMERICAN MODERN PROPERTY AND CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY Casualty Broker-Agent 10/02/2018 Property Broker-Agent 10/02/2018 ANTHEM BLUE CROSS LIFE AND HEALTH INSURANCE COMPANY Accident and Health 12/01/1993 Life-Only 12/01/1993 BLUE SHIELD OF CALIFORNIA LIFE & HEALTH INSURANCE COMPANY Accident and Health 11/02/2010 Life-Only 11/02/2010 COAST NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY Casualty Broker-Agent 10/22/2007 Property Broker-Agent 10/22/2007 Showing 1 to 10 of 26 entries Previous 1 2 3 Next Back to Top Copyright © State of California EXHIBIT B EXHIBIT B NBBJ Events Business Events Construction Wine Industry Cannabis Real Estate Law Manufacturing Search...  Subscribe Rebuilding a Wine Country home after fire may cost way more than insurance provides, architects say prev next SLIDE 1 OF 2 Julia Donoho, interim chairwoman of the American Institute of Architects Redwood Empire chapter, leads a discussion of designers, engineers and city building officials Wednesday, Oct. 18, 2017, on how to respond to the North Bay wildfire damage to homes and businesses. .The meeting was held in Axia Architects's offices in Santa Rosa. (JEFF QUACKENBUSH / NORTH BAY BUSINESS JOURNAL) JEFF QUACKENBUSH  BUSINESS JOURNAL STAFF REPORTER October 20, 2017 Order Article Reprint Architects and city building officials who have been helping owners of the several Example from Lake thousand homes destroyed in the North Bay fires plan their next steps hear that County's massive fire many want their former homes back. But like with the ongoing recovery from the Here is a March 14, 2016, replacement- Lake County fires, what insurance may provide to rebuild could be far less than what cost estimate for a home destroyed in it typically costs to do so. the 2015 Lake County Valley fire. Jessie Whitesides, a principal architect for Asquared Studios, has been volunteering at Hard costs: Building the American Institute of Architects booth in the Santa Rosa local assistance center, structures and common questions she has been hearing are ow much it will cost to rebuild, why Main house an architect is needed and what steps are required. Square footage: 1,740 Contractor estimates: $391,500– “When they share the amount the insurance company is giving them for the house, $522,000; $225–$325 per square foot and I calculate that for them with the square footage (of the house), most insurance Porches and decks companies are offering about $160 a square foot,” she told architects, engineers and Square footage: 1,072 a couple of homeowners gathered in Santa Rosa on Wednesday for the inaugural Contractor estimates: $37,320–$62,200; meeting of the Firestorm Recovery Committee, just formed by the institutes's $35–$58 psf Redwood Empire chapter. “So, I think we need to be prepared to tell them what the Garage and accessory spaces minimum is here.” Square footage: 956 Contractor estimates: $50,640–$84,400; Architects among the 60 who attended the meeting noted that, based on what it $53–$88 psf currently costs to build homes in the Santa Rosa area, the per-square-foot minimums Subtotal: Building structures could be roughly $300 in the ravaged Coffey Park subdivision of northwest Santa Square footage: 3,768 Rosa, $400 for the Mark West and Larkfield neighborhoods north of the city and Contractor estimates: $479,460– $500–$800 for northeast hillside custom homes in the Fountaingrove area of Santa $668,600; $127–$177 psf Rosa. Soft costs: Design, “That's the bare minimum - drywall, paint, baseboard,” Whitesides said. “My tactic was permits and fees to explain to them hard costs versus soft costs, explain to your insurance company Architecture and engineering, 8 percent: that there's no way you are going to get your house back without spending money on $38,357–$53,448 soft costs.” Utility connections, 2 percent: $9,589– $13,372 “Hard costs” include what it takes to physically build the structure. “Soft costs” cover Building permits and fees, 4 percent: what it takes at the architecture, engineering, utilities and permitting levels to make $12,754 that happen. Total soft costs: $60,700–$79,614; $16– $21 psf Homeowners wanting to have the same design rebuilt through local governments' Hard and soft costs: $540,160– expedited review process still will need to get a architect and a structural engineer to $748,214; $143–$199 psf update the plans for code changes, such as California's energy-efficiency, green- Source: Julia Donoho, AIA, Esq. building and life-and-safety requirements. Homeowners also will need to get certified More business coverage of the North Bay fires: that below-slab underground utilities are OK. And that's after cleanup of the former nbbj.news/2017fires home sites is completed. Among fire-recovery efforts the architects group wants to move quickly on include providing the public a range of real examples of what it costs to build homes like those burned, as a starting point for negotiations with insurance companies. Depending on the policy, there can be percentage caps for actual replacement costs, noted Julia Donoho, interim chairwoman of the local architect group chapter as well as an architect and attorney. Last year, she helped homeowners in Lake County negotiate with carriers for funds to rebuild after the Valley fire. “It is very possible may not be able to build the same house for that amount of BREAKING NEWS ALERTS money,” Donoho said. Receive immediate notice of major Doug Hilberman, principal of Axia Architects and among those who lost home to the local breaking news events. fire, cautioned his colleagues at the recovery committee meeting about putting out Enter your email address figures on construction costs. He had been in meetings with building industry professionals, local business leaders, and Santa Rosa and county of Sonoma officials Subscribe Now and found they each have a perspective how they will participate in rebuilding. “The insurance company starts with an expert coming in with a formula, but we as Read our Privacy Policy designers like to say, ‘Yes, you had an apple, but let's talk about what your real needs are, and maybe, it's an orange when we look at it from a community standpoint what would be good in that location,'” Hilberman said. “Having talked to my own insurance agent, they say that if it is going to cost more, they are open to that dialogue. We have to recognize that it's a challenge for the homeowner if the insurance company is cost-estimating an apple and you're handing them a set of plans for an orange. That's where the dialogue gets long, and we're going to add time to this discussion.” And the clock on common policy provisions for living expenses is ticking, he noted. When the typical 24-month living expenses period includes a few months for cleanup and permitting, many homeowners need to start getting updated plans submitted back to local building departments in the next few months, Hilberman emphasized. Trade groups plan to lobby Sacramento for a two-year extension. MOST POPULAR 1 2 3 California wine industry lost more than North Bay geothermal power expansion $250 million in value as a result of port Digital Marketing: 8 online trends for plan gains steam disruptions business success in 2022 4 5 6 Home COVID tests to be covered by Sonoma County issues ban on large insurers starting Saturday. Here’s what Napa Valley radio company makes big gatherings amid latest omicron surge you need to know shift to Spanish-language format Jesse Oswald, Santa Rosa permit intake manager, told the recovery committee that the city plans to evaluate rebuild plans and do inspections initially but eventually turn that over to a larger authority, such as the Federal Emergency Management Agency. Also part of a forthcoming urgency ordinance would be a planning process for all the burned areas of the city. “If you're rebuilding what was there before, you will not need much review,” Oswald said. “My intent that if it is stamped by a design professional, we will issue the permit.” Licensing by the California Architects Board isn't required under state law for designs of certain single-family homes. Because of the magnitude of the fires and the expected flood of plans submissions, city staff plan to issue building permits the next day after plans come in with the stamps of a state-licensed architect and structural engineer. If updated and stamped plans are submitted to the city with changes in the height or footprint of the home, that will require more involved review, Oswald said. And if it's a totally different house, it's essentially redevelopment and will call for even more scrutiny, albeit in priority to submissions from outside the burn area, Oswald said. “All submittals will require a plan review,” Oswald said Oct. 24. “Those submitted by RELATED STORIES licensed design professionals will obtain the fastest turnaround, providing the submittal is complete.” Jeff Quackenbush (jquackenbush@busjrnl.com, 707-521-4256) covers the wine business and commercial construction and real estate. UPDATE, Oct. 24, 2017: Closing comment from Jesse Oswald of the city of Santa Rosa, Rebuilt homes in Santa Rosa's clarifying review of plans from licensed and unlicensed designers. fire-leveled Coffey Park by summer? CORRECTION, Oct. 23, 2017: Designs of certain single-family homes and rural properties don't have to be done by a licensed architect under state law. However, city of Santa Rosa Building Division staff plans to issue permits the next day for plans with the stamps of licensed architects and engineers. Others will have to go through more extended plan check. UPDATE, Oct. 23, 2017: Starting points for per-square-foot costs of replacement for North Bay homeowners race to bump up insurance homes were added for Mark West/Larkfield and clarified for Fountaingrove, per Julia coverage after fires Donoho of AIA of the Redwood Empire. Sponsored Content on North Bay Business Journal In 2022, Resolve To Be Better Informed On The Issues Concerning Christians Today  By WORLD Opinions From WORLD News Group: Sound journalism, grounded in facts and Biblical truth. EXHIBIT C EXHIBIT C  Subscribe Sections Real Sonoma News and conversation about Sonoma County real estate Custom Built Sonoma County Homes for the Price of a Search ...  Prefab Most Popular    6 Sonoma County fixers for less than $500,000 6 condos in Sonoma County perfect for starting out or downsizing Ukiah home with stunning 270- degree views listed for $1.3 million Santa Rosa rents up 12.7% over last year The Hydeaway House, Sonoma, designed by Schwartz and Architecture (Photography: Matthew Millman) Five Santa Rosa homes under Architect Neal Schwartz’s Sonoma County home — The $650,000 Hydeaway House — was built to prove a point: a custom built house, done right, can give you more bang for your buck than a prefab. Mr. Schwartz, who teaches at the California College of Arts and owns San Francisco-based Schwartz and Architecture, About this blog has seen a growing number of local house hunters who are considering prefab, but at the same time want the option of more customizable and site-responsive homes. Utilizing a “thoughtful design” process, Mr. Schwartz enjoys complementing the efficient floor plans of smaller strategic (and less expensive) structures with the increased sense of expansiveness that view, light, air and space can provide. To help solve the dilemma clients faced of having to choose  between prefabricated or custom construction, Schwartz began thinking his way out of the prefab box. “While I am interested in prefab solutions and support the industry, I realized that there might still be a place for small- scaled homes at a competitive price — homes that have the ability to take far more advantage of the particular qualities of the site,” Schwartz said. His Hydeaway House, located on a Carneros vineyard, is the prototype for his alternative to the prefab solution. Christina Molcillo is a full-time writer with experience in online content development, digital marketing, and creative strategy. She has a background in journalism, magazine publication, web design, teaching, as well as avoiding karaoke nights and awkward situations. She also has a penchant for old cars, older houses, and vintage Italian scooters. Archives Select Month  Categories Select Category  Our Network Taking his inspiration directly from the Sonoma County landscape, Schwartz went about designing this two- bedroom, two-bath 1,900-square-foot Carneros home as a weekend retreat and a place to retire for himself, his spouse; Ron Flynn, and their two Spinone Italianos; Florence and Aldo. From afar, the one-story box-like structure looks similar to some prefab models: its design retains the benefits of an efficient floor plan, streamlined construction, and the economical and sustainable use of materials. But look closer and it becomes apparent that the house engages so much more sympathetically with its surroundings that it literally embraces the countryside.  Hydeaway House’s nuanced design coupled with careful use of site-responsive materials enables the comfortable dwelling to both easily accommodate to and take advantage of Northern California’s dramatic shifts in weather — over the course of a day, a week or over the course of the year. To control costs, Schwartz and Architecture works to evaluate the most strategic use of client resources; then builds a foundation of decision making and design that can endure far longer than the latest design trend. The total cost of the Hydeaway House was $720,000, or $360 a square foot. (Popular prefab models range between $300 and $450 a square foot. High-end residential construction in Sonoma County is typically around $450 a square foot, excluding costs for permits, engineering and design fees). To furnish the house, Neal Schwartz sought out interesting, durable and reasonably priced pieces. The architect always finds inspiration at modern furniture store Room & Board.  Architect Neal Schwartz fashioned the coffee tables in the living room from slices of white cypress. The light fixtures, based on D.I.Y. plans supplied by Brooklyn lighting designer Lindsey Adelman, were made with inexpensive parts from a local hardware store. The art work was fabricated from cut- outs of bird photographs, from a book by Andrew Zuckerman.  Having completed the Hydeaway House, “the vineyard prototype” of his simple idea, Schwartz went onto design a second prototype located amidst the rugged hills surrounding the Sonoma Valley. He appropriately named the house “Box on the Rock.”  A lone outpost perched on pier foundations, this three- bedroom, three-bath 2,000 square foot hillside house is indeed a literal box on the rocks — or perhaps the house might be viewed as a camera obscura, revealing cinematic views through the square-cut entry court, the striking landscape later revealed in its entirety through the living area’s wall-length window. Box on the Rock, Sonoma Valley, designed by Schwartz and Architecture (Photography: Bruce Damonte) “Box on the Rock” again begins with a basic rectangular shape, but the uneven terrain inspired Schwartz and Architecture to rearrange the design into a diamond-like structure in order to properly respond to the difficult conditions of the site. While the house takes on a rather unconventional shape, it remains rational and, in Neal Schwartz’s words, “un-finicky.” The home’s grey-stained cedar wood exterior aids the dwelling to beautifully complement the rugged stony landscape. “We tend to focus on a few key natural materials and let those do the talking,” said Mr. Schwartz, “ if you look carefully, the feeling of space comes from light, air and views, rather than from a palette of expensive materials.” Now working on a third “woods version” prototype, the SPUR House, Schwartz and Architecture is continuing to refine their “thoughtful design,” proving the point that a custom home doesn’t necessarily need to be either fancy or fussy. And, if done right, a custom home can be more flexible than a prefab with the help of the view, light, air and space.  Box on the Rock: the overhang of the front cantilevered deck and the angle of its exterior glass walls are carefully calibrated to capture the warming of winter’s morning sun while at the same time insuring that the internal space is protected from the unwanted harshness of summer sun’s glare. Later in the day, the central courtyard comes alive with the afternoon sun, but remains always in pleasant partial shade. The sequence of spaces also captures natural cross breezes drawn through the valley, cooling both the house and the semi-enclosed outdoor spaces.   By Sofia Englund | April 12th, 2016 | 11 Comments  EXHIBIT D EXHIBIT D Cal. R. app. I Emergency Rule 9 Rule Emergency Rule 9 - Tolling statutes of limitations for civil causes of action (a) Tolling statutes of limitations over 180 days Notwithstanding any other law, the statutes of limitations and repose for civil causes of action that exceed 180 days are tolled from April 6, 2020, until October 1, 2020. (b) Tolling statutes of limitations of 180 days or less Notwithstanding any other law, the statutes of limitations and repose for civil causes of action that are 180 days or less are tolled from April 6, 2020, until August 3, 2020. Cal. R. Ct. App I R. R. Emergency Rule 9 Appendix I amended effective May 29, 2020; adopted effective April 6, 2020. Advisory Committee Comment Emergency rule 9 is intended to apply broadly to toll any statute of limitations on the filing of a pleading in court asserting a civil cause of action. The term "civil causes of action" includes special proceedings. (See Code Civ. Proc., §§ 312, 363 ["action," as used in title 2 of the code (Of the Time of Commencing Civil Actions), is construed "as including a special proceeding of a civil nature"); special proceedings of a civil nature include all proceedings in title 3 of the code, including mandamus actions under §§ 1085, 1088.5, and 1094.5 -all the types of petitions for writ made for California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and land use challenges]; see also Pub. Resources Code, § 21167(a)-(e) [setting limitations periods for civil "action[s]" under CEQA].) The rule also applies to statutes of limitations on filing of causes of action in court found in codes other than the Code of Civil Procedure, including the limitations on causes of action found in, for example, the Family Code and Probate Code 1 EXHIBIT E EXHIBIT E California Code, Insurance Code - INS § 2071 | FindLaw Explore Resources For... Cases & Codes Practice Management Legal Technology Corporate Counsel Law Students Blogs ARE YOU A LEGAL CONSUMER? Find a Lawyer Visit Our Consumer Site Search Twitter FacebooBegin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select Search for legal topics on FindLaw Search FindLaw Research Your Legal Issue LinkedI Cases & Codes Email Practice Management Legal Technology AddThiCorporate Counsel Law Students 2 Blogs For Consumers ... FindLaw Codes California Insurance Code § 2071 California Code, Insurance Code - INS § 2071 Current as of January 01, 2019 | Updated by FindLaw Staff Search California Codes Search by Keyword or Citation Enter Keyword or Citation Enter Keyword or Citation Search Search by Keyword or Citation Search Cancel « Prev Next » (a) The following is adopted as the standard form of fire insurance policy for this state: California Standard Form Fire Insurance Policy https://codes.findlaw.com/ca/insurance-code/ins-sect-2071.html[1/11/2022 9:43:36 AM] California Code, Insurance Code - INS § 2071 | FindLaw No. [Space for insertion of name of company or companies issuing the policy and other matter permitted to be stated at the head of the policy.] [Space for listing amounts of insurance, rates and premiums for the basic coverages insured under the standard form of policy and for additional coverages or perils insured under endorsements attached.] In consideration of the provisions and stipulations herein or added hereto and of ____ dollars premium this company, for the term of ________ from the _________________ day of ______________ , 20 ___________ ) At 12:01 a.m., to the ___________________ day of ______________ , 20 ___________ ) standard time, at location of property involved, to an amount not exceeding ____ dollars, does insure ________ and legal representatives, to the extent of the actual cash value of the property at the time of loss, but not exceeding the amount which it would cost to repair or replace the property with material of like kind and quality within a reasonable time after the loss, without allowance for any increased cost of repair or reconstruction by reason of any ordinance or law regulating construction or repair, and without compensation for loss resulting from interruption of business or manufacture, nor in any event for more than the interest of the insured, against all LOSS BY FIRE, LIGHTNING AND BY REMOVAL FROM PREMISES ENDANGERED BY THE PERILS INSURED AGAINST IN THIS POLICY, EXCEPT AS HEREINAFTER PROVIDED, to the property described hereinafter while located or contained as described in this policy, or pro rata for five days at each proper place to which any of the property shall necessarily be removed for preservation from the perils insured against in this policy, but not elsewhere. Assignment of this policy shall not be valid except with the written consent of this company. This policy is made and accepted subject to the foregoing provisions and stipulations and those hereinafter stated, which are hereby made a part of this policy, together with any other provisions, stipulations and agreements as may be added hereto, as provided in this policy. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this company has executed and attested these presents; but this policy shall not be valid unless countersigned by the duly authorized agent of this company at Secretary. President. Countersigned this , 20 day of __________________________ ________________________________ ______ ______________________________________ Agent Concealment, fraud This entire policy shall be void if, whether before or after a loss, the insured has willfully concealed or misrepresented any material fact or circumstance concerning this insurance or the subject thereof, or the interest of the insured therein, https://codes.findlaw.com/ca/insurance-code/ins-sect-2071.html[1/11/2022 9:43:36 AM] California Code, Insurance Code - INS § 2071 | FindLaw or in case of any fraud or false swearing by the insured relating thereto. Uninsurable and excepted property This policy shall not cover accounts, bills, currency, deeds, evidences of debt, money or securities; nor, unless specifically named hereon in writing, bullion or manuscripts. Perils not included This company shall not be liable for loss by fire or other perils insured against in this policy caused, directly or indirectly, by: (a) enemy attack by armed forces, including action taken by military, naval or air forces in resisting an actual or an immediately impending enemy attack; (b) invasion; (c) insurrection; (d) rebellion; (e) revolution; (f) civil war; (g) usurped power; (h) order of any civil authority except acts of destruction at the time of and for the purpose of preventing the spread of fire, provided that the fire did not originate from any of the perils excluded by this policy; (i) neglect of the insured to use all reasonable means to save and preserve the property at and after a loss, or when the property is endangered by fire in neighboring premises; (j) nor shall this company be liable for loss by theft. Other insurance Other insurance may be pr