On December 28, 2006 a
Party Discovery
was filed
involving a dispute between
San Francisco Housing Authority,
and
Does 1 To 10 Inclusive,
Malepeai, Naumati,
for UNLAWFUL DETAINER - RESIDENTIAL
in the District Court of San Francisco County.
Preview
CE
San Francisco Superior Courts
Information Technology Group
Document Scanning Lead Sheet
Jan-10-2007 10:13 am
Case Number: CUD-06-620566
Filing Date: Jan-10-2007 9:59
Juke Box: 001 Image: 01646174
LERKS JUDGMENT - UNLAWFUL DETAINER - POSSESSION ONL
SAN FRANCISCO HOUSING AUTHORITY VS. NAUMATI MALEPEAI et al
001001646174
Instructions: .
Please place this sheet on top of the document to be scannedUD-110
ATTORNEY OR PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY
Arnold W. Evje II (State Bar # #09 #095134)
Genold wy. ewe I, Esq.
gan Fane Califc 94117
a
@n rales CaS Ha SON FAX NO. (Optional: (415) 861-6073 F
E-MAIL ADDRESS (Optional:
ATTORNEY FOR (Name): San Francisco Housing Authority, Plaintiff Sen Franbiseo
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
street anoress: 400 McAllister Street
waiting aooress: 400 McAllister Street
crTy AND ZIP CODE: San Francisco 94102 GORD
Branch Name: Superior Court-Limited Jurisdiction-400 McAlligger
PLAINTIFF: San Francisco Housing Authority
co
address): FOR COURT USE ONLY
DEFENDANT: Naumati Malepeai and and Does 1-10 inclusive.
JUDGMENT—UNLAWFUL DETAINER CASE NUMBER:
(3) By Clerk CX) By Detaut (=) atter Court Triat
Co By Court [3c] Possession Only [J Defendant Did Not CUD-06-620566
Appear at Trial
JUDGMENT
1. £X] BY DEFAULT
a. Defendant was properly served with a copy of the summons and complaint.
b. Defendant failed to answer the complaint or appear and defend the action within the time allowed by law.
¢. Defendant's default was entered by the clerk upon plaintiff's application.
d. [X] Clerk's Judgment (Code Civ. Proc., § 1169). For possession only of the premises described on page 2 (item 4).
e. (] Court Judgment (Code Civ. Proc., § 585(b)). The court considered
mld plaintiff's testimony and other evidence.
(2)[] plaintiff's or others' written declaration and evidence (Code Civ. Proc., § 585(d)).
2. ["] AFTER COURT TRIAL. The jury was waived. The court considered the evidence.
a. The case was tried on (date and time):
before (name of judicial officer):
b. Appearances by:
(1) Plaintiff (name each): (1) Plaintiffs attorney (name each):
(1)
(2)
[1 Continued on Attachment 2b (form MC-025).
[1] Defendant (name each): [) Defendant's attorney (name each):
(1)
(2)
[[] Continued on Attachment 2b (form MC-025).
c. [_] Defendant did not appear at trial. Defendant was properly served with notice of trial,
d. [_] Astatement of decision (Code Civ. Proc., § 632) [_] wasnot [_] was requested.
Page 1 of 2
Fem Approved pone JUDGMENT—UNLAWFUL DETAINER Code of Gi Presadue $9 415.46,
UD-110 [New January 1, 2003)
‘LexisNexis® Automated California Judicial Council Forms|_ PLAINTIFF: San Francisco Housing Authority CASE NUMBER:
CUD-06-620566
DEFENDANT: Naumati Malepeai and And Does 1-10 Inclusive.
JUDGMENT IS ENTERED AS FOLLOWS BY: (2) THE court THE CLERK
3. Parties. Judgment is
a. EX] for plaintitt (name each): .
San Francisco Housing Authority
and against defendant (name each):
_ _Naumati Malepeai
[©] Continued on Attachment 3a (form MC-025).
b. [_] for defendant (name each):
4. [x] Plaintiff [] Defendant is entitled to possession of the premises located at (street address, apartment, city, and county):
~< 7Harbor Road, San Francisco, California 94124
5. [3] Judgment applies to all occupants of the premises including tenants, subtenants if any, and named claimants if any (Code Civ.
Proc., §§ 715.010, 1169, and 1174.3).
6. Amount and terms of judgment
a. [] Defendant named in item 3a above must pay plaintiff on the bp. [J] Plaintiff is to receive nothing from defendant
complaint: named in item 3b.
(1) [2] Past-due rent $ LJ porencant named in item 3b is to recover
(2) [7] Holdover damages $ [-] and attorney fees: $
3) CO Attorney fees $
(4) [1 Costs $
(©) C] other (specify): $
(6) TOTAL JUDGMENT $
¢. [X] The rental agreement is canceled. [x] The lease is forfeited.
7. [J Conditionat Judgment. Plaintiff has breached the agreement to provide habitable premises to defendant as stated in
Judgment—Unlawtul Detainer Attachment (form UD-1 10S), which is attached.
8. [J other (specify):
[_) Continued on Attachment 8 (form MC-025).
Date: Co
JUDICIAL OFFICER
Date: January 10, 2007 XI clerk, by Rhpabast , Deputy
7
(SEAL) CLERK'S CERTIFICATE (Optional)
| certify that this is a true copy of the original judgment on file in the court.
Date:
Clerk, by , Deputy
{U0-110 [New January 1, 2003] JUDGMENT—UNLAWFUL DETAINER Page 2 of 2
LexisNexis® Automated California Judictal Council Forms
Document Filed Date
January 10, 2007
Case Filing Date
December 28, 2006
Category
UNLAWFUL DETAINER - RESIDENTIAL
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.