arrow left
arrow right
  • GOLDEN GLOBAL ENTERPRISES INC., a California Corporation, et al  vs.  TIM ONDERKO, et al(42) Unlimited Other Complaint (Not Spec) document preview
  • GOLDEN GLOBAL ENTERPRISES INC., a California Corporation, et al  vs.  TIM ONDERKO, et al(42) Unlimited Other Complaint (Not Spec) document preview
  • GOLDEN GLOBAL ENTERPRISES INC., a California Corporation, et al  vs.  TIM ONDERKO, et al(42) Unlimited Other Complaint (Not Spec) document preview
  • GOLDEN GLOBAL ENTERPRISES INC., a California Corporation, et al  vs.  TIM ONDERKO, et al(42) Unlimited Other Complaint (Not Spec) document preview
						
                                

Preview

CM-015 ATTORNEYORPARTYWITHOUTATTORNEY(Namo, State Bar number, and address): FORCOURT USEONLY Donald A. Wilson Wilson & Wilson 1695 Broadway Street Redwood City, CA 94063 recerHoneno: 650 366 8241 FAXNO.(Options): E-MAIL ADDRESS(Optionay: Wildon43@gmail. com ATTORNEYFOR(Name):Plaintiffs SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF San Mateo streetaAooress:400 County Center MAILING ADDRESS: eiryanpzipcope: Redwood City, CA 94063 BRANCHNAME: : CASE NUMBER: PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER: Golden Global Enterprises, et al *PHISCS, 22-CIV-02099 DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT: Tim Onderko JUDICIAL OFFICER: Hon. Marie S.Weiner DEPT.: NOTICE OF RELATED CASE 2 Identify, inchronologicalorderaccording todate offiling, allcases relatedtothecase referenced above. 1. a. Title: Golden Global et al v Tim Onderko b. Case number: 22-CIV- 02099 c. Court: same asabove ° ; [1 otherstateor federalcourt(name and address): d. Department: 2 e. Case type: limitedciv [__] unlimitedcivil[_] probate [_] familylaw [[_] other (specify): f. Filing date: 5/24/22 g. Has thiscase been designated ordetermined as “complex?” [7] Yes No h. Relationshipofthiscase tothe case referencedabove (check all that apply): involvesthesame partiesand isbased on thesame orsimilarclaims. arisesfrom thesame crsubstantially identical transactions,incidents, orevents requiringthedeterminationof thesame orsubstantially identicalquestionsoflaw orfact. involvesclaimsagainst,title to,possession of,ordamages tothe same property. ‘ islikely forother reasonsto requiresubstantial duplicationof judicial resourcesif heardby different judges. . . [J Additionalexplanationisattached inattachment 1h . i.Status ofcase: pending L_] dismissed [__] with [__] withoutprejudice - [2] disposed ofby judgment 2. a. Title:Onderko v Wilson b. Case number: 22-CIV- 02332 c. Court: same asabove ["~] _ otherstateor federalcourt(name and address): d. Department: 23 Page1 of3 "ea ound CM-015 of Gatonea [Rev. July 1, 2007] NOTICE OF RELATED CASE a cor . GM-015 | PLAINTIFFIPETITIONER: Golden Global Enterprises, etal Pm NUMBER: cwv.ons | DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT: Tim Onderko 2. (continued) e. Case type: limitedcivil_[_"] untimitedcivilL_] probate [—_] familylaw [_] other(specify): f. Filing date: 6/8/22 g. Has thiscase been designated ordetermined as “complex?” [-_] Yes No h. Relationshipofthiscase tothe case referencedabove (check allthatapply): _ involvesthesame partiesand isbased on thesame orsimilarclaims, [‘#"] arisesfrom thesame orsubstantially identical transactions,incidents, orevents requiringthedeterminationof the same or substantially identical questionsoflaw orfact. involvesclaimsagainst,title to,possession of,ordamages to thesame property. islikely forother reasonsto requiresubstantial duplicationofjudicial resourcesif heardby different judges. [°°] Additionalexplanationisattachedin attachment2h i.Status ofcase: pending [_] dismissed [_] with [7] withoutprejudice [-~] disposed ofby judgment 4. a. Title: b. Case number: : c. Court: [7] same asabove [| otherstate-orfederalcourt(name and address): d. Department: e, Case type: (_] limitedcivil [_] unlimitedcivil[_] probate ["—] familylaw [[7] other(specify): f. Filing date: g. Has thiscase been designated ordetermined as “complex?” []) ves [_] No h,.Relationshipofthiscase.tothe case referencedabove (check allthatapply): [| involvesthesame partiesand isbased on thesame or similar claims. [] arisesfrom thesame orsubstantially identical transactions,incidents, orevents requiringthedeterminationof fhesame or substantially identicalquestionsoflaw orfact. [1 involvesclaimsagainst,title to,possession of,ordamages to thesame property. [—__] islikely forother reasonsto requiresubstantial duplication of judicial resources if heard by different judges. [1 Additionalexplanationisattached inattachment3h i.Status ofcase: CI pending [| dismissed [| with [| withoutprejudice [| disposed-ofby judgment 4, [_] Additionalrelatedcases aredescribed inAttachment 4.Number ofpages attached: Date: 10-3-22 ’ . J ( Donald A. Wilson > Lx ATTY oF ee CYPE OR PRINT NAME OF PARTY ORATTORNEY) eee (SIGNATURE GINPARTY OR ATTERNEY)