On June 09, 2020 a
Party Statement
was filed
involving a dispute between
Deutsche Bank Ag,
and
Alexander Vik,
Caroline Vik,
for T90 - Torts - All other
in the District Court of Fairfield County.
Preview
DOCKET NO.: FST-CV20-6047029-S : SUPERIOR COURT
:
DEUTSCHE BANK AG, : JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF
: STAMFORD/NORWALK
Plaintiff, :
: AT STAMFORD
v. :
:
:
CAROLINE VIK, ET AL., :
:
Defendants. : August 3, 2022
:
:
JOINT STATUS REPORT
Pursuant to the Court’s June 29, 2022 Order (Dkt. No. 205.01), Plaintiff Deutsche
Bank AG and Defendants Caroline Vik and Alexander Vik jointly submit this report regarding
(1) the status of Defendants’ appeal from the Court’s March 11, 2021 decision denying
Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to the Litigation Privilege (the “Litigation Privilege
Appeal”), and (2) the status of any outstanding discovery issues.
First, the Appellate Court has not yet ruled on the Litigation Privilege Appeal, which
remains pending.
Second, Deutsche Bank’s position is that it has fully complied with all pending
discovery requests. Defendants’ position with respect to discovery is that there remain certain
outstanding issues. Defendants are preparing a letter to Deutsche Bank that will set forth the
issues they believe remain open. The parties will endeavor in good faith to resolve any
remaining issues without Court intervention.
In light of the foregoing, at this time, no party requests that the Court schedule a
status conference. The parties may request a status conference to the extent one becomes
necessary to address discovery issues and/or the October 7 hearing depending on the timing and
substance of a decision by the Appellate Court.
DEFENDANTS CAROLINE VIK AND PLAINTIFF DEUTSCHE BANK AG
ALEXANDER VIK
By: /s/ Monte E. Frank By: /s/ David G. Januszewski
Monte E. Frank David G. Januszewski
Pullman & Comley, LLC Juris No. 403654
850 Main Street P.O. Box 7006 Sheila C. Ramesh
Bridgeport, Connecticut 06601 Juris No. 535593 (PHV)
mfrank@pullcom.com Cahill Gordon & Reindel LLP
T: 203-330-2000 32 Old Slip
F: 203-576-8888 New York, New York 10005
djanuszewski@cahill.com
Attorneys for Defendants Caroline sramesh@cahill.com
Vik and Alexander Vik T: 212-701-3000
F: 212-269-5420
Thomas D. Goldberg
Jennifer M. Palmer
Day Pitney LLP
One Stamford Plaza
263 Tresser Boulevard, 7th Floor
Stamford, CT 06901
tgoldberg@daypitney.com
jpalmer@daypitney.com
T: 203-977-7300
F: 203-977-7301
Juris No. 014230
Attorneys for Plaintiff Deutsche Bank AG
-2-
CERTIFICATION
This is to certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was or will immediately be
mailed or delivered electronically or non-electronically on August 3, 2022 to all counsel and
self-represented parties of record and that written consent for electronic delivery was received
from all counsel and self-represented parties of record who were or will immediately be
electronically served.
/s/ Jennifer M. Palmer
Jennifer M. Palmer
-3-
Document Filed Date
August 03, 2022
Case Filing Date
June 09, 2020
Category
T90 - Torts - All other
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Preview
DOCKET NO.: FST-CV20-6047029-S : SUPERIOR COURT : DEUTSCHE BANK AG, : JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF : STAMFORD/NORWALK Plaintiff, : : AT STAMFORD v. : : : CAROLINE VIK, ET AL., : : Defendants. : August 3, 2022 : : JOINT STATUS REPORT Pursuant to the Court’s June 29, 2022 Order (Dkt. No. 205.01), Plaintiff Deutsche Bank AG and Defendants Caroline Vik and Alexander Vik jointly submit this report regarding (1) the status of Defendants’ appeal from the Court’s March 11, 2021 decision denying Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to the Litigation Privilege (the “Litigation Privilege Appeal”), and (2) the status of any outstanding discovery issues. First, the Appellate Court has not yet ruled on the Litigation Privilege Appeal, which remains pending. Second, Deutsche Bank’s position is that it has fully complied with all pending discovery requests. Defendants’ position with respect to discovery is that there remain certain outstanding issues. Defendants are preparing a letter to Deutsche Bank that will set forth the issues they believe remain open. The parties will endeavor in good faith to resolve any remaining issues without Court intervention. In light of the foregoing, at this time, no party requests that the Court schedule a status conference. The parties may request a status conference to the extent one becomes necessary to address discovery issues and/or the October 7 hearing depending on the timing and substance of a decision by the Appellate Court. DEFENDANTS CAROLINE VIK AND PLAINTIFF DEUTSCHE BANK AG ALEXANDER VIK By: /s/ Monte E. Frank By: /s/ David G. Januszewski Monte E. Frank David G. Januszewski Pullman & Comley, LLC Juris No. 403654 850 Main Street P.O. Box 7006 Sheila C. Ramesh Bridgeport, Connecticut 06601 Juris No. 535593 (PHV) mfrank@pullcom.com Cahill Gordon & Reindel LLP T: 203-330-2000 32 Old Slip F: 203-576-8888 New York, New York 10005 djanuszewski@cahill.com Attorneys for Defendants Caroline sramesh@cahill.com Vik and Alexander Vik T: 212-701-3000 F: 212-269-5420 Thomas D. Goldberg Jennifer M. Palmer Day Pitney LLP One Stamford Plaza 263 Tresser Boulevard, 7th Floor Stamford, CT 06901 tgoldberg@daypitney.com jpalmer@daypitney.com T: 203-977-7300 F: 203-977-7301 Juris No. 014230 Attorneys for Plaintiff Deutsche Bank AG -2- CERTIFICATION This is to certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was or will immediately be mailed or delivered electronically or non-electronically on August 3, 2022 to all counsel and self-represented parties of record and that written consent for electronic delivery was received from all counsel and self-represented parties of record who were or will immediately be electronically served. /s/ Jennifer M. Palmer Jennifer M. Palmer -3-