arrow left
arrow right
  • MARTIN ENG VS. JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. ET AL (Pltf 170.6 Challenge Judge Quidachay) RICO document preview
  • MARTIN ENG VS. JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. ET AL (Pltf 170.6 Challenge Judge Quidachay) RICO document preview
  • MARTIN ENG VS. JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. ET AL (Pltf 170.6 Challenge Judge Quidachay) RICO document preview
  • MARTIN ENG VS. JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. ET AL (Pltf 170.6 Challenge Judge Quidachay) RICO document preview
  • MARTIN ENG VS. JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. ET AL (Pltf 170.6 Challenge Judge Quidachay) RICO document preview
  • MARTIN ENG VS. JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. ET AL (Pltf 170.6 Challenge Judge Quidachay) RICO document preview
						
                                

Preview

Soe YN aA nH Bw Ym NN YN Bw YN KR NR Be Be Be we eB Be BP Be BP oa Aw BBN FF SF GC wm I DHA BRB YW KH SB DS Quality Loan Service Corporation ELECTRONICALLY Daniel J. Goulding, Esq. (SBN: 120561) FILED Julie O. Molteni, Esq. (SBN: 265133) ‘Superior Court of California, Corporate Counsel County of San Francisco 411 Ivy Street 11/30/2015 San Diego, CA 92101 Cierkiot ine |Court Telephone: (619) 645-7711 x 2019 Deputy Clerk Facsimile: (619) 568-3518 Corporate Counsel for Quality Loan Service Corporation erroneously sued as Quality Loan Services SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO Case No. CGC-15-546377 DECLARATION OF BOUNLET LOUVAN IN SUPPORT OF QUALITY’S DECLARATION OF NONMONETARY STATUS MARTIN ENG, Plaintiff, v. JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.; QUALITY LOAN SERVICES; LENDER PROCESSING SERVICES, INC.; DOES 1- 1000 inclusive, Defendants. I, Bounlet Louvan, declare as follows: 1. Iam the Foreclosure Legal Liaison and Former Trustee Sale Officer for Defendant Quality Loan Service Corp. (“Quality”). I make the following Declaration in support of its Nonmonetary Status. 2. If called to testify as a witness thereon, J could and would competently testify as to all the facts stated in this Declaration. 3. ‘This Declaration is made pursuant to California Civil Code § 29241. 4, Quality is a Trustee under a Deed of Trust dated 6/28/2005. Said Deed of Trust is a secured lien on real property commonly known as 939 Lombard St, San Francisco, CA 94133, and was filed for record on 7/22/2005 in the San Francisco County Recorder’s Office as Instrument Number 2005-H996159-00. i DECLARATION OF BOUNLET LOUVAN IN SUPPORT OF QUALITY’S NONMONETARY STATUS CA-15-692726-DNM eS +ret oe IN a 10 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 2 2 23 24 25 26 27 28 5. On June 16, 2015, Plaintiff filed a Complaint in the San Francisco Superior Court, (“Complaint”). The Complaint arises out of a loan involving the borrower and the lender. Quality is simply the foreclosure trustee (“Trustee”), with the power to foreclose on the property that arises from the Deed of Trust securing the loan. 6. It is my reasonable belief that Quality has been named in this action solely in its capacity as Trustec, and not arising out of any wrongful acts or omissions on its part in the performance of its duties as Trustee. The basis for my reasonable knowledge or belief set forth above is that Quality has not been involved in any way with the property which is the subject of this lawsuit outside of its capacity as Trustee, and has no interest in the property, except to be named as the Trustee under the deed of trust encumbering the property by way of Substitution of Trustee. The trustee’s conduct, including the recording of the substitution of trustee and foreclosure notices, is privileged pursuant to Civil Code §§47 and 2924(d). 7. I am not aware of any evidence produced to date by Plaintiff or the remaining Defendants, or of any facts, documents, or testimony tending to suggest that Quality engaged in any misconduct in connection with the performance of its duties as Trustee. Pursuant to Civil Code §2924(b) the foreclosure trustee incurs no liability for reliance in good faith on information provided in good faith by the beneficiary regarding the nature and amount of the default under the secured obligation. 7 : 8. The Complaint makes no allegations that Quality failed to perform any of its duties as a Trustee, and a review of Quality’s file confirms that Quality complied with the applicable foreclosure statutes. None of the remaining Defendants filed a Cross-Complaint against Quality alleging any defect in the performance of its duties as trustee, either under the Deed of Trust, or the applicable statutes set forth in Civil Code §2924, et seq. Hi dit Mi Mit Mit 2 = DECLARATION OF BOUNLET LOUVAN IN SUPPORT OF QUALITY’S NONMONETARY STATUS CA-15-692726-DNM. ab BiOo 6 YA HW Fw YY = YR YR NY KR KR KD DY Be ew ew we Be ee ee ea aank Go HO S&F 5 © we TDA A BH H FS 9. Quality agrees to be bound by whatever order or judgment is issued by this Court regarding the Trustee, provided such order or judgment is nonmonetary relief only. I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California, that the foregoing its true and correct. Executed on November 6, 2015 at San Diego, California. ‘oreclosure Kegal Liaison for Defendant, Quality Loan Service Corporation 3 DECLARATION OF BOUNLET LOUVAN IN SUPPORT OF QUALITY’S NONMONETARY STATUS CA-15-692726-DNM 2