arrow left
arrow right
  • MARTIN ENG VS. JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. ET AL (Pltf 170.6 Challenge Judge Quidachay) RICO document preview
  • MARTIN ENG VS. JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. ET AL (Pltf 170.6 Challenge Judge Quidachay) RICO document preview
  • MARTIN ENG VS. JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. ET AL (Pltf 170.6 Challenge Judge Quidachay) RICO document preview
  • MARTIN ENG VS. JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. ET AL (Pltf 170.6 Challenge Judge Quidachay) RICO document preview
  • MARTIN ENG VS. JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. ET AL (Pltf 170.6 Challenge Judge Quidachay) RICO document preview
  • MARTIN ENG VS. JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. ET AL (Pltf 170.6 Challenge Judge Quidachay) RICO document preview
						
                                

Preview

Oo oe ND HW FW N Se Be NS Oo - &k WwW BRYAN Cave LLP 560 MISSION STREET, 25TH FLOOR SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94105-2994 NN NY NY NN NN NY SY Se SF Se oN AA Rw YH FF SGC OAUTH BRYAN CAVE LLP Daniel T. Rockey, California Bar No. 178604 Goli Mahdavi, California Bar No. 245705 560 Mission Street, 25th Floor San Francisco, CA 94105-2994 ELECTRONICALLY FILED Supertor Court of Calffornia, County of San Francisco 12/08/2015 Clerk of the Court BY-NOELIA RIVERA Deputy Clerk SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO Telephone: (415) 675-3400 Facsimile: (415) 675-3434 E-Mail: daniel.rockey@bryancave.com goli.mahdavi@bryancave.com Attorneys for Defendant JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. MARTIN ENG, Plaintiff, v. JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.; QUALITY LOAN SERVICES; LENDER, PROCESSING SERVICES, INC., DOES 1- 1000 inclusive, Defendants. SFO1IDOCS\266824.1 Case No. CGC-15-546377 MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES IN SUPPORT OF REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.’S DEMURRER TO PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT [Filed concurrently with Notice of Demurrer and Demurrer; Memorandum of Points and Authorities; Request for Judicial Notice and (Proposed) Order] Date: January 6, 2016 Time: 9:30 a.m. Dept.: 501 Complaint Filed: June 16, 2015 Trial Date: Not Yet Assigned MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES ISO REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE ISO DEFENDANT’S DEMURRER TO PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINTCom IN DH BF WN re oO RoR BRYAN CAVE LLP 560 MISSION STREET, 25TH FLOOR SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94105-2994 Rw NN NY NN NNN Se Ee Se ee oN HRA FF BHF SD we ADHD MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES Pursuant to California Code of Civil Procedure sections 430.30(a) and 430.70, Defendant JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. (“Defendant”) request that this Court take judicial notice of Exhibits A through I in considering its Demurrer to Plaintiff's Complaint. Section 452(c) of the California Evidence Code provides that the Court may take judicial notice of “[o]fficial acts of the legislative, executive, and judicial departments of . . . any state of the United States.” Second 452(d) of the California Evidence Code provides that the Court may take judicial notice of “records of (1) any court of this state or (2) any court of record of the United States or any state of the United States.” Section 452(h) of the California Evidence Code provides that the Court may take judicial notice of “[fJacts and propositions that are not reasonably subject to dispute and are capable of immediate and accurate determination by resort to sources of reasonably indisputable accuracy.” This Court may take judicial notice of Exhibits A, C through I because they are documents recorded in the official records of San Francisco County. Pursuant to California Evidence Code Section 452(c), these documents constitute an official state act. In addition, courts have consistently taken judicial notice of recorded instruments under Califomia Evidence Code section 452(h) in similar circumstances. See Fontenot v. Wells Fargo Bank, 198 Cal. App. 4th 256, 264 (2011); Satchmed Plaza Owners Ass’n v. UWMC Hospital Corp., 167 Cal. App. 4th 1034, 1040- 1041 (2008) (granting request for judicial notice of recorded deeds); McElroy v. Chase Manhattan Mortgage Corp., 134 Cal. App. 4th 388, 394 (2005) (taking judicial notice of notice of default and notice of trustee’s sale recorded in county official records). The Court may also take judicial notice of Exhibit B as it is a document published by the federal government, a matter of public record, and its accuracy “cannot reasonably be questioned.” Bracamontes v. Chase Home Finance, LLC, 2011 WL 332527 (N.D. Cal. Jan. 31, 2011) (taking judicial notice of the subject agreement); see also Allen v. United Fin. Mortg. Corp., 660 F.Supp.2d 1089, 1093-94 (N.D. Cal. 2009) (granting defendant's request for judicial notice of the “Purchase & Assumption Agreement” between Chase and the FDIC because the entire document was available online, from the FDIC's web site). SFOIDOCS\266824.1 1 MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES ISO REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE ISO DEFENDANT’S DEMURRER TO PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT0 Oe ND HW BRB WN eae RON Se SO BRYAN Cave LLP 560 MISSION STREET, 25TH FLOOR n SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94105-2994 NN NN Ne Be Be Se WH KF DO ew ND Re KR YN ond Aw For these reasons, Defendant respectfully request that the Court take judicial notice of the attached Exhibits A through I. Dated: December 8, 2015 Respectfully submitted, BRYAN C, LLP By: Goli Mahdavi, Attorneys for Defendant JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. SFOIDOCS\266824.1 2 MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES ISO REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE ISO DEFENDANT’S DEMURRER TO PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT