On June 16, 2015 a
Order to Show Cause
was filed
involving a dispute between
Eng, Martin,
and
Castellanos, Marylou,
Does 1 To 1000 Inclusive,
Jp Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.,
Lender Processing Services, Inc.,
Quality Loan Service Corporation Erroneously Sued,
Quality Loan Services,
Sotheby'S International Realty,
for civil
in the District Court of San Francisco County.
Preview
Quynh Chen (SBN 292889)
Lee & Chen LLP
1904 Franklin Street, Ste. 415
Oakland. CA 94612 ELECTRONICALLY}
Telephone: (415) 779-2888 FILED
Fax: (415) 738-7873 Supertor Court of California,
County of San Francisco
Attorney for Plaintiff eieaGeoun
Martin Eng BY:ROMY RISK
Deputy Cletk
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNA
COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
UNLIMITED CIVIL JURISDICTION
MARTIN E? Case No. CGC 15-346377
Plaintiff, DECLARATION OF PLAINTIFF
SUPPORTING TEMPORARY
vs. RESTRAINING ORDER AND
PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION
JP MORGAN CHASE BANK. N.A.
QUALITY LO ENDER | Date: Dee. 14, 2015
PROCESING SERVICES, INC., DOES 1- | Dept.: 302
1000 inclusive Judge:
Defendants. Action filed: 6/16/15
TO ALL PARTIES AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD:
I, Plaintiff Martin Eng. declares:
1. Lam the Plaintiff in this action.
2. | have personal knowledge of the following facts and am competent to testify as to
their truth if called as a witness.
3. When it comes to home owning knowledge, I have the knowledge of an average home
owner.
4.1 did not know that Chase’s practices are fraudulent until they acted to take away my
home in 2015 and I sought help from an attorney. | am willing to pay market value rent to Chase.
aie
Martin Eng v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. et al. Case No, CGC-15-546377
DECLARATION OF MARTIN ENG IN SUPPORT OF EX PARTE APPLICATIONBW hf
oO OB YH
5. Currently, Defendant JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A (“Chase”) through its agents
have listed online to sell the Property at issue commonly known as 939 Lombard Street, San
Francisco, CA 94133-2217. They are currently showing the house to prospective buyers.
I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is
true and correct.
Date: 42 “pel By:
Qe
Martin Eng v. JP Morgen Chase Bank, N.A. et al, Case No. CGC-15-546377
DECLARATION OF MARTIN ENG IN SUPPORT OF EX PARTE APPLICATION
Document Filed Date
December 14, 2015
Case Filing Date
June 16, 2015
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Preview
Quynh Chen (SBN 292889) Lee & Chen LLP 1904 Franklin Street, Ste. 415 Oakland. CA 94612 ELECTRONICALLY} Telephone: (415) 779-2888 FILED Fax: (415) 738-7873 Supertor Court of California, County of San Francisco Attorney for Plaintiff eieaGeoun Martin Eng BY:ROMY RISK Deputy Cletk SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNA COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO UNLIMITED CIVIL JURISDICTION MARTIN E? Case No. CGC 15-346377 Plaintiff, DECLARATION OF PLAINTIFF SUPPORTING TEMPORARY vs. RESTRAINING ORDER AND PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION JP MORGAN CHASE BANK. N.A. QUALITY LO ENDER | Date: Dee. 14, 2015 PROCESING SERVICES, INC., DOES 1- | Dept.: 302 1000 inclusive Judge: Defendants. Action filed: 6/16/15 TO ALL PARTIES AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD: I, Plaintiff Martin Eng. declares: 1. Lam the Plaintiff in this action. 2. | have personal knowledge of the following facts and am competent to testify as to their truth if called as a witness. 3. When it comes to home owning knowledge, I have the knowledge of an average home owner. 4.1 did not know that Chase’s practices are fraudulent until they acted to take away my home in 2015 and I sought help from an attorney. | am willing to pay market value rent to Chase. aie Martin Eng v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. et al. Case No, CGC-15-546377 DECLARATION OF MARTIN ENG IN SUPPORT OF EX PARTE APPLICATIONBW hf oO OB YH 5. Currently, Defendant JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A (“Chase”) through its agents have listed online to sell the Property at issue commonly known as 939 Lombard Street, San Francisco, CA 94133-2217. They are currently showing the house to prospective buyers. I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct. Date: 42 “pel By: Qe Martin Eng v. JP Morgen Chase Bank, N.A. et al, Case No. CGC-15-546377 DECLARATION OF MARTIN ENG IN SUPPORT OF EX PARTE APPLICATION