arrow left
arrow right
  • MARTIN ENG VS. JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. ET AL (Pltf 170.6 Challenge Judge Quidachay) RICO document preview
  • MARTIN ENG VS. JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. ET AL (Pltf 170.6 Challenge Judge Quidachay) RICO document preview
  • MARTIN ENG VS. JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. ET AL (Pltf 170.6 Challenge Judge Quidachay) RICO document preview
  • MARTIN ENG VS. JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. ET AL (Pltf 170.6 Challenge Judge Quidachay) RICO document preview
  • MARTIN ENG VS. JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. ET AL (Pltf 170.6 Challenge Judge Quidachay) RICO document preview
  • MARTIN ENG VS. JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. ET AL (Pltf 170.6 Challenge Judge Quidachay) RICO document preview
  • MARTIN ENG VS. JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. ET AL (Pltf 170.6 Challenge Judge Quidachay) RICO document preview
  • MARTIN ENG VS. JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. ET AL (Pltf 170.6 Challenge Judge Quidachay) RICO document preview
						
                                

Preview

BRYAN CAVE LL THREE EMBARCADERO CENT 8 8 SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111-4070 BRYAN CAVE LLP Daniel T. Rockey, California Bar No. 178604 Goli Mahdavi, California Bar No. 245705 Three Embarcadero Center, 7th Floor San Francisco, CA 94105-2994 Telephone: (415) 675-3400 Facsimile: (415) 675-3434 E-Mail: daniel.rockey@bryancave.com goli.mahdavi@bryancave.com Attorneys for Defendant JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. ELECTRONICALLY FILED Superior Court of California, County of San Francisco 02/03/2017 Clerk of the Court BY-SANDRA SCHIRO Deputy Clerk SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO MARTIN ENG, Plaintiff, Vv. JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.; QUALITY LOAN SERVICES; LENDER PROCESSING SERVICES, INC., DOES 1- 1000 inclusive, Defendants. SFO1DOCS\297052.1 Case No. CGC-15-546377 NOTICE OF ENTRY OF ORDER Date: — February 3, 2017 Time: 9:00 a.m. Dept.: 302 - DISCOVERY June 16, 2015 August 21, 2017 Complaint Filed: Trial Date: NOTICE OF ENTRY OF ORDER1 TO PLAINTIFFS AND THE CLERK OF THE COURT: 2 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that on February 3, 2017, the Court in the above- 3 |] captioned action entered an Order to Deem Requests for Admissions Admitted, 4 || Compelling Discovery Responses and the Production of Documents and Imposing 5 |] Sanctions. The Order is attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated by this reference. 6 7 || Dated: February 3, 2017 Respectfully submitted, 8 BRYAN CAVE LLP Daniel Rockey 9 Goli Mahdavi 10 6 gol LENA. $ By: 12 Goli Mahdavi 7 Attomeys*for Defendant 13 JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 SFOLDOCS\297052.1 1 NOTICE OF ENTRY OF ORDEREXHIBIT ABRYAN CAVE LLP THREE EMBARCADERO CENTER, 7" FLOOR SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111-4070 Com YN DH BF Ww NY a eet tele a BYR RRBRBREESSPRFUAARE EHTS BRYAN CAVE LLP Daniel T. Rockey, California Bar No. 178604 Goli Malidavi, California Bar No. 245705 Three Embarcadero-Center, 7th Floor San Francisco, CA 94105-2994 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO Telephone: (415) 675-3400 Facsimile: (415) 675-3434 E-Mail: daniel.rockey@bryancave.com goli.mahdavi@bryancave.com Attorneys for Defendant JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. MARTIN ENG, Plaintiff, v. JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.; QUALITY LOAN SERVICES; LENDER PROCESSING SERVICES, INC., DOES 1- 1000 inclusive, Defendants. SFO1DOCS\294742.1 Case No. CGC-15-546377 [PROPOSED] ORDER TO DEEM REQUESTS FOR ADMISSIONS ADMITTED, COMPELLING DISCOVERY RESPONSES AND THE PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS AND IMPOSING SANCTIONS Date: Time: Dept.: * February 3, 2017 9:00 a.m. 302 - DISCOVERY Complaint Filed: Trial Date: June 16, 2015 August 21, 2017 [PROPOSED] ORDERBRYAN CAVE LLP THREE EMBARCADERO CENTER, 7™ FLOOR SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111-4070 Coe YN DH BBW YY RN Bee Be ewe ew ewe ew ew ee BNRRRPBSRRRFSSSWAFBTREBERTS The Motion of Defendant, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. (“Defendant”), to have matters deemed admitted in Chase’s First Set of Requests for Admission, to compel Plaintiff Martin Eng (“Eng”) to respond to Defendant’s Form Interrogatories, Set One, Special Interrogatories, Set One, and Request for Production, Set One, and to impose sanctions came on regularly for hearing, and the Court being fully advised and good cause appearing therefor, THE COURT HEREBY ORDERS THAT: 1. Defendant’s motion to have Requests for Admission, Set One to Plaintiff Martin Eng deemed admitted is GRANTED. Defendant’s Requests for Admission numbers 1-32 are hereby deemed admitted. 2. Defendant’s motion to compel Plaintiff to respond to Defendant’s Form Interrogatories, Set One is GRANTED. Plaintiff is ordered to serve full and complete responses to the subject Form Interrogatories, without objections, within 20 days of the date of this ruling. 3. ° Defendant’s motion to compel Plaintiff to respond to Defendant’s Special Interrogatories, Set One is GRANTED. Plaintiff is ordered to serve full and complete responses to the subject Special Interrogatories, without objections, within 20 days of the date of this ruling. 4, Defendant’s motion to compel Plaintiff to respond to Defendant’s Request for Production, Set One is GRANTED. Plaintiff is ordered to serve full and complete responses to the subject Request for Production, without objections, and to produce all responsive documents, within 20 days of the date of this ruling. 5. Defendant’s request for monetary sanctions against Plaintiff is GRANTED in the amount of $2,150. Plaintiff shall pay Defendant said amount within 20 days of the date of this tuling. , IT IS SO ORDERED Dated: DZ feb LOK Judge Pro Tem Frai\cisco County Judge of the Supézior Court of SFOIDOCS\294742.1 1 [PROPOSED] ORDERBRYAN CAVE LLP, THREE EMBARCADERO CENTER, 77" FLOOR SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111-4077; PROOF OF SERVICE I am employed by Bryan Cave LLP, with an office located in the County of San Francisco, State of California. I am over the age of 18 and not a party to the within action. My business address is Three Embarcadero Center qT Floor, San Francisco, California 94111. On February 3, 2017, I caused to be served on the interested parties on said action the within: NOTICE OF ENTRY OF ORDER by placing a true copy thereof in a sealed envelope(s) addressed to each as follows: Peter L. Kutrubes Attorney for Plaintiff Stephen P. Lin Law Offices of Peter L. Kutrubes 590 Lennon Lane, Suite 180 Walnut Creek, CA 94598 Tel: 925.939.9600 Fax: 925.256.7660 | pkutrubes@kutrubeslaw.com Leticia Butler, Esq. Attorneys for Quality Loan Service Corp. McCarthy & Holthus, LLP 1770 4" Avenue San Diego, CA 92101 Tel: (619) 685-4800 Fax: (619) 685-4811 Email: Ibutler@mccarthyholtus.com Stanley W. Smith Attorneys for Sotheby's International Niven & Smith Realty, Inc. & Mary Lou Castellanos 555 Montgomery Street, Suite 1750 San Francisco, CA 94111-2517 Tel: (415) 981-5451 Fax: (415) 433-5439 Email: sws@nivensmith.com BY U.S. MAIL: I am “readily familiar” with the firm’s practice of collection and processing correspondence for mailing. Under that practice it would be deposited with U.S. postal service on that same day with postage thereon fully prepaid at San Francisco, California, in the ordinary course of business. | am aware that on motion of the party served, service is presumed invalid if postal cancellation date or postage meter date is more than one day after date of deposit for mailing in affidavit. <<] (STATE) I declare under penalty of perjury the laws of the State of California that the above is true and correct. SFOLDOCS\297052.1 PROOF OF SERVICE