arrow left
arrow right
  • MARTIN ENG VS. JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. ET AL (Pltf 170.6 Challenge Judge Quidachay) RICO document preview
  • MARTIN ENG VS. JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. ET AL (Pltf 170.6 Challenge Judge Quidachay) RICO document preview
  • MARTIN ENG VS. JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. ET AL (Pltf 170.6 Challenge Judge Quidachay) RICO document preview
  • MARTIN ENG VS. JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. ET AL (Pltf 170.6 Challenge Judge Quidachay) RICO document preview
  • MARTIN ENG VS. JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. ET AL (Pltf 170.6 Challenge Judge Quidachay) RICO document preview
  • MARTIN ENG VS. JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. ET AL (Pltf 170.6 Challenge Judge Quidachay) RICO document preview
						
                                

Preview

BRYAN CAVE LL THREE EMBARCADERO CENT 8 8 SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111-4070 BRYAN CAVE LLP Daniel T. Rockey, California Bar No. 178604 Goli Mahdavi, California Bar No. 245705 Three Embarcadero Center, 7th Floor San Francisco, CA 94105-2994 Telephone: (415) 675-3400 Facsimile: (415) 675-3434 E-Mail: daniel.rockey@bryancave.com goli.mahdavi@bryancave.com Attorneys for Defendant JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. ELECTRONICALLY FILED Superior Court of Catifornia, County of San Francisco 04/28/2017 Clerk of the Court BY: ANNIE PASCUAL Deputy Clerk SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO MARTIN ENG, Plaintiff, Vv. JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.; QUALITY LOAN SERVICES; LENDER PROCESSING SERVICES, INC., DOES 1- 1000 inclusive, Defendants. SFOIDOCS\302379.1 Case No. CGC-15-546377 NOTICE OF UNAVAILABILITY OF COUNSEL Complaint Filed: — June 16, 2015 Trial Date: August 21, 2017 NOTICE OF UNAVAILABILITY OF COUNSEL.BRYAN CAVE LLP, THREE EMBARCADERO CENTER, 7" FLOOR SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111-4077; TO ALL PARTIES AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD: NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that commencing May 19, 2017 and continuing through May 29, 2017, GOLI MAHDAVI will be out of the country on a pre-paid family vacation and unavailable for all purposes, including, but not limited to, receiving any kind of notice, appearing in court, responding to ex-parte applications, or attending depositions. NOTICE IS FURTHER GIVEN that under the case authority of Tenderloin Housing Clinic v Sparks, 8 Cal. App. 4th 299 (1992), intentionally scheduling a conflicting proceeding without good cause is conduct subject to sanctions. Dated: April 28, 2017 Respectfully submitted, BRYAN CAVE LLP Daniel Rockey Goli Mahdavi Vv By: Goli Mahdavi Attorneys for Defendant JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. SFOLDOCS\302379.1 1 NOTICE OF UNAVAILABILITY OF COUNSEL.BRYAN CAVE LLP, THREE EMBARCADERO CENTER, 7" FLOOR SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111-4077; PROOF OF SERVICE Tam employed by Bryan Cave LLP, with an office located in the County of San Francisco, State of California. I am over the age of 18 and not a party to the within action. My business address is Three Embarcadero Center 7" Floor, San Francisco, California 94111. On April 28, 2017, I caused to be served on the interested parties on said action the within: NOTICE OF UNAVAILABILITY OF COUNSEL by placing a true copy thereof in a sealed envelope(s) addressed to each as follows: Peter L. Kutrubes Attorney for Plaintiff Stephen P. Lin Law Offices of Peter L. Kutrubes 590 Lennon Lane, Suite 180 Walnut Creek, CA 94598 Tel: 925.939.9600 Fax: 925.256.7660 slin@kutrubeslaw.com | pkutrubes@kutrubeslaw.com Leticia Butler, Esq. Attorneys for Quality Loan Service Corp. McCarthy & Holthus, LLP 1770 4" Avenue San Diego, CA 92101 Tel: (619) 685-4800 Fax: (619) 685-4811 Email: Ibutler@mecarthyholtus.com Stanley W. Smith Attorneys for Sotheby’s International Niven & Smith Realty, Inc. & Mary Lou Castellanos 555 Montgomery Street, Suite 1750 San Francisco, CA 94111-2517 Tel: (415) 981-5451 Fax: (415) 433-5439 Email: sws@nivensmith.com BY U.S. MAIL: [am “readily familiar” with the firm’s practice of collection and processing correspondence for mailing. Under that practice it would be deposited with U.S. postal service on that same day with postage thereon fully prepaid at San Francisco, California, in the ordinary course of business. I am aware that on motion of the party served, service is presumed invalid if postal cancellation date or postage meter date is more than one day after date of deposit for mailing in affidavit. X (STATE) I declare under penalty of perjury the laws of the State of California that the above is true and correct. 4 Kelly Feldman SFOLDOCS\302379.1 PROOF OF SERVICE