Preview
oO Om YN Dn RF Bw NY
w RP NM NR NYDN & Be Bm Be Be Be ee ee
FITZGERALD YAP KREDITOR LLP
Eric P. Francisconi (SBN 172102)
efrancisconi@fyklaw.com
16148 Sand Canyon Avenue
Irvine, California 92618
Telephone:(949) 788-8900
Facsimile: (949) 788-8980
Attorneys for Plaintiff
GLUMAC
ELECTRONICALLY
FILED
Superior Court of California,
County of San Francisco
03/04/2016
Clerk of the Court
BY:VANESSA WU
Deputy Clerk
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO - CIVIC CENTER COURTHOUSE
GLUMAC, a California Corporation,
Plaintiff,
Vv.
ZETA COMMUNITIES, INC. dba ZETA
DESIGN + BUILD, and DOES 1 through 50,
inclusive,
Defendants.
Case No.: CGC-15-548454
[Unlimited Jurisdiction]
NOTICE OF CONTINUANCE OF CASE
MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
Date: July 20, 2016
Time: 10:30 a.m.
Dept.: 610
Complaint Filed: October 15,2015
To all parties and their respective counsel of record:
You are hereby notified that the Court has continued the case management conference scheduled
for March 16, 2016 to take place or July 20, 2016. A true and correct copy of the order is attached.
DATED: March 2, 2016
FITZGERALD YAP KREDITOR LLP
v
Michael J. FitzGerald
Eric P. Francisconi
Attorneys for Plaintiff Glumac, a California corporation
-L
NOTICE OF CONTINUANCE OF CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCESUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO Cc
400 MCALLISTER STREET, SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94102-4514 A l
Ben
GLUMAG oe 7 i Case Management Department 610
Case Management Order
PLAINTIFF (S)
vs. NO. CGC-15-548454
ZETA COMMUNITIES, INC. DBA ZETA
DESIGN + BUILD et al Order Continuing Case
Management Conference
DEFENDANT (S)
TO: ALL COUNSEL AND SELF-REPRESENTED LITIGANTS
The Mar-16-2016 CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE is canceled, and it is hereby ordered:
This case is set for a case management conference on Jul-20-2016 in Department 610 at 10:30 am for
plaintiff to obtain default judgment against defendant(s).
CRC 3.725 requires the filing and service of a case management statement form CM-110 no later than
fifteen (15) days before the case management conference. However, it would facilitate the issuance of a
case management order without an appearance at the case management conference if the case
management statement is filed, served and lodged in Department 610 twenty-five (25) days before the
case management conference.
PLAINTIFF(S) must serve a copy of this notice on all parties not listed on the attached proof of service
within five (5) days of the date of this order.
DATED: FEB-26-2016 JOHN K. STEWART
JUDGE OF THE SUPERIOR COURT
Order Continuing Case Management Conference
Form 000001CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE BY MAIL
), the undersigned, certify that | am an employee of the Superior Court of California, County of San Francisco and not a party to
“the above-entitled cause and that on FEB-26-2016 | served the attached Order Continuing Case Management Conference by
placing a copy thereof in an envelope addressed to all parties to this action as listed below. | then placed the envelope in the
outgoing mail at 400 McAllister Street, San Francisco, CA 94102, on the date indicated above for collection, sealing of the
envelope, attachment of required prepaid postage, and mailing on that date, following standard court practice.
Dated: FEB-26-2016 By: DARLENE LUM
ERIC P FRANCISCONI (172102)
FITZGERALD YAP KREDITOR LLP
16148 SAND CANYON AVENUE
IRVINE, CALIFORNI 92618
ERIC P FRANCISCONI (172102)
FITZGERALD YAP KREDITOR LLP
16148 SAND CANYON AVENUE
IRVINE, CALIFORNI 92618
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE BY MAIL
Page 1 of 1 Form 000001Co mn nu
10
ul
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
PROOF OF SERVICE
Glumac, a California corporation v. Zeta Communities, Inc. dba Zeta Design + Build
Superior Court of California, County of San Francisco, Case No.: CGC-15-548454
Tam employed in the County of Orange, State of California. I am over the age of 18 and not a
party to the within action; my business address is16148 Sand Canyon Avenue, Irvine, California
92618; my email address is jrodriguez@fyklaw.com.
On March 3, 2016, I served the foregoing document(s) described as follows:
NOTICE OF CONTINUANCE OF CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
on the interested parties in this action by placing ] a true copy C1] the original thereof addressed as
follows:
Zeta Communities, Inc. dba Zeta Design
+Build
5321 Luce Avenue, Bay F
McClellan, CA 95652
x (MAIL) (C.C.P. § 1013(a)) Pursuant to CCP § 1013(a) and under firm practice said envelope
would be deposited with the U.S. Postal Service on the same day with postage thereof fully prepaid at
Irvine, California in the ordinary course of business. I am readily familiar with FitzGerald Yap
Kreditor LLP’s ordinary business practice of collection and processing correspondence for mailing. I
followed this business practice and I placed the envelope for collection and mailing on the date
identified above. I am aware that on motion of the party served, service is presumed invalid if
postage cancellation date or postage date is more than one day after date of deposit for mailing in
affidavit.
[1 (ELECTRONIC SERVICE) (CCP § 1010.6(a)(4)) I caused such document(s) to be
electronically served on all interested parties in this action, which is then printed and maintained with
the original documents in our office. :
Xl (STATE) I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the
above is true and correct.
Executed on March 3, 2016, at Irvine, California.
|
Jaclyn ee r
PROOF OF SERVICE
Preview
oO Om YN Dn RF Bw NY w RP NM NR NYDN & Be Bm Be Be Be ee ee FITZGERALD YAP KREDITOR LLP Eric P. Francisconi (SBN 172102) efrancisconi@fyklaw.com 16148 Sand Canyon Avenue Irvine, California 92618 Telephone:(949) 788-8900 Facsimile: (949) 788-8980 Attorneys for Plaintiff GLUMAC ELECTRONICALLY FILED Superior Court of California, County of San Francisco 03/04/2016 Clerk of the Court BY:VANESSA WU Deputy Clerk SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO - CIVIC CENTER COURTHOUSE GLUMAC, a California Corporation, Plaintiff, Vv. ZETA COMMUNITIES, INC. dba ZETA DESIGN + BUILD, and DOES 1 through 50, inclusive, Defendants. Case No.: CGC-15-548454 [Unlimited Jurisdiction] NOTICE OF CONTINUANCE OF CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE Date: July 20, 2016 Time: 10:30 a.m. Dept.: 610 Complaint Filed: October 15,2015 To all parties and their respective counsel of record: You are hereby notified that the Court has continued the case management conference scheduled for March 16, 2016 to take place or July 20, 2016. A true and correct copy of the order is attached. DATED: March 2, 2016 FITZGERALD YAP KREDITOR LLP v Michael J. FitzGerald Eric P. Francisconi Attorneys for Plaintiff Glumac, a California corporation -L NOTICE OF CONTINUANCE OF CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCESUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO Cc 400 MCALLISTER STREET, SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94102-4514 A l Ben GLUMAG oe 7 i Case Management Department 610 Case Management Order PLAINTIFF (S) vs. NO. CGC-15-548454 ZETA COMMUNITIES, INC. DBA ZETA DESIGN + BUILD et al Order Continuing Case Management Conference DEFENDANT (S) TO: ALL COUNSEL AND SELF-REPRESENTED LITIGANTS The Mar-16-2016 CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE is canceled, and it is hereby ordered: This case is set for a case management conference on Jul-20-2016 in Department 610 at 10:30 am for plaintiff to obtain default judgment against defendant(s). CRC 3.725 requires the filing and service of a case management statement form CM-110 no later than fifteen (15) days before the case management conference. However, it would facilitate the issuance of a case management order without an appearance at the case management conference if the case management statement is filed, served and lodged in Department 610 twenty-five (25) days before the case management conference. PLAINTIFF(S) must serve a copy of this notice on all parties not listed on the attached proof of service within five (5) days of the date of this order. DATED: FEB-26-2016 JOHN K. STEWART JUDGE OF THE SUPERIOR COURT Order Continuing Case Management Conference Form 000001CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE BY MAIL ), the undersigned, certify that | am an employee of the Superior Court of California, County of San Francisco and not a party to “the above-entitled cause and that on FEB-26-2016 | served the attached Order Continuing Case Management Conference by placing a copy thereof in an envelope addressed to all parties to this action as listed below. | then placed the envelope in the outgoing mail at 400 McAllister Street, San Francisco, CA 94102, on the date indicated above for collection, sealing of the envelope, attachment of required prepaid postage, and mailing on that date, following standard court practice. Dated: FEB-26-2016 By: DARLENE LUM ERIC P FRANCISCONI (172102) FITZGERALD YAP KREDITOR LLP 16148 SAND CANYON AVENUE IRVINE, CALIFORNI 92618 ERIC P FRANCISCONI (172102) FITZGERALD YAP KREDITOR LLP 16148 SAND CANYON AVENUE IRVINE, CALIFORNI 92618 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE BY MAIL Page 1 of 1 Form 000001Co mn nu 10 ul 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 PROOF OF SERVICE Glumac, a California corporation v. Zeta Communities, Inc. dba Zeta Design + Build Superior Court of California, County of San Francisco, Case No.: CGC-15-548454 Tam employed in the County of Orange, State of California. I am over the age of 18 and not a party to the within action; my business address is16148 Sand Canyon Avenue, Irvine, California 92618; my email address is jrodriguez@fyklaw.com. On March 3, 2016, I served the foregoing document(s) described as follows: NOTICE OF CONTINUANCE OF CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE on the interested parties in this action by placing ] a true copy C1] the original thereof addressed as follows: Zeta Communities, Inc. dba Zeta Design +Build 5321 Luce Avenue, Bay F McClellan, CA 95652 x (MAIL) (C.C.P. § 1013(a)) Pursuant to CCP § 1013(a) and under firm practice said envelope would be deposited with the U.S. Postal Service on the same day with postage thereof fully prepaid at Irvine, California in the ordinary course of business. I am readily familiar with FitzGerald Yap Kreditor LLP’s ordinary business practice of collection and processing correspondence for mailing. I followed this business practice and I placed the envelope for collection and mailing on the date identified above. I am aware that on motion of the party served, service is presumed invalid if postage cancellation date or postage date is more than one day after date of deposit for mailing in affidavit. [1 (ELECTRONIC SERVICE) (CCP § 1010.6(a)(4)) I caused such document(s) to be electronically served on all interested parties in this action, which is then printed and maintained with the original documents in our office. : Xl (STATE) I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the above is true and correct. Executed on March 3, 2016, at Irvine, California. | Jaclyn ee r PROOF OF SERVICE