arrow left
arrow right
  • SYNERGY PROJECT MANAGEMENT, INC. VS. CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO OTHER NON EXEMPT COMPLAINTS (Intentional interference with contractual relations) document preview
  • SYNERGY PROJECT MANAGEMENT, INC. VS. CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO OTHER NON EXEMPT COMPLAINTS (Intentional interference with contractual relations) document preview
  • SYNERGY PROJECT MANAGEMENT, INC. VS. CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO OTHER NON EXEMPT COMPLAINTS (Intentional interference with contractual relations) document preview
  • SYNERGY PROJECT MANAGEMENT, INC. VS. CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO OTHER NON EXEMPT COMPLAINTS (Intentional interference with contractual relations) document preview
  • SYNERGY PROJECT MANAGEMENT, INC. VS. CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO OTHER NON EXEMPT COMPLAINTS (Intentional interference with contractual relations) document preview
  • SYNERGY PROJECT MANAGEMENT, INC. VS. CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO OTHER NON EXEMPT COMPLAINTS (Intentional interference with contractual relations) document preview
						
                                

Preview

ATTORNEY OR PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY (Namo and Address): TELEPHONENO.: (415) 554-7888 FOR COURT USE ONLY Debra D. Lew, State Bar No. 114537 Tax Collector - Legal Section City and County of San Francisco P.O. Box 7426 F T , D San Francisco, CA 94120-7426 . Superior C tof cal fimia JATTORNEY FOREN cLamaNT: CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO AUG 11 2020 wwe OF court: SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO STREET appREss: 400 McAllister Street RK OF-THE CQURT MAILING ADDRESS: 400 Mcallister Street | oF Te [city AND zip cove: San Francisco, CA 94102 Chetk BRANCH NAME: Unlimited Civil Jurisdiction PLAINTIFF: SYNERGY PROJECT MANAGEMENT, INC. DEFENDANT: CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, ‘CASE NUMBER: . attachment Eatwcomentet Judgment) CGC-17-660034 ALL PARTIES IN THIS ACTION ARE NOTIFIED THAT 1. Alien is created by this notice under a. [__] Article 3 (commencing with section 491.410) of Chapter 11 of Title 6.5 of Part 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure. b. [3c] Article 5 (commencing with section 708.410) of Chapter 6 of Title 9 of Part 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure. 2. The lien is based on a .a. [__] right to attach order and an order permiting the creation of a lien (copies attached). b. [3] money judgment. ‘ 3. The right to attach order or the money judgment is entered in the following action: a. Title of court (specify): SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO b. Name of case (specify): CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO v. SYNERGY PROJECT MANAGMENT, INC c. Number of case (specify): CPF-19-516755 d. [x] Date of entry of judgment (specify): July 12, 2019 e. [__] Dates of renewal of judgment: (specify): 4, The name and address of the judgment creditor or person who obtained the right to attach order are (specify): CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 5. The cae and last known address of the judgment debtor or person whose property is subject to the right to attach order are (specify) SeRenGy PROJECT MANAGEMENT, INC. 6. The amount required to satisfy the judgment creditor's money judgment or to secure the amount to be secured by the attachment at the time this notice of lien is filed is $ 138,590.14 7. The lien created by this notice attaches to any cause of action of the person named in item 5 that is the subject of this action or proceeding and to that person's rights to money or property under any judgment subsequently procured:in this action-or proceeding. 8. No compromise, dismissal, settlement, or satisfaction of this action or Proceeding or any of the rights of the person named in item 5 to money or property under any judgment procured in this action or proceeding may be entered into by or on behalf of that person, and that person may not enforce any rights to money or property under any judgment procured in this action or Proceeding bya awrit or otherwise, unless one of the following requirements is satisfied: a. the prior approval by order of the court in this action or proceeding has been obtained; b. the written consent of the person named in item 4 has been obtained or that person has released the lien; or c. the money judgment of the person named in item 4 has been satisfied. NOTICE The person named in item 5 may claim an exemption for all or any portion of the money or property within 30 days after receiving notice of the creation of the lien. The exemption is waived if it is not claimed in time. Date: August 7, 2020 Debra D. Lew > (TYPE OR PRINT NAME) "_ (SIGNATURE OF LIEN CLAIMANT OR ATTORNEY) Form Approved by the 7 Judicial Council of California NOTICE OF LIEN * CCP 491.410, 708.410 ‘AT-180, EJ-185 [New January 1, 1985] (Attachment—Enforcement of Judgment)oC ON DH RF Ww NH RY NY NY NY N NN NY PB Be Be Be we Be Be eB eda A A FYB YH &§ SF © HM ADA BFW NH KF OO THERESA A. BUCKLEY, State Ba DEBRA D. LEW, State Bar No. 114 Tax Collector - Legal Section city and County of San Francisco -O. Box oe . San Francisco, CA 94120-7426 JUL 1.2 2019 Telephone: (415) 554-4400 (Main), (415) 554-4492 (Direct) Facsimile: (415) 554-5010 KD % Sumarine Cait “Gan Franninne ~- To Attorneys for Plaintiff CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO UNLIMITED CIVIL JURISDICTION CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, Case No. “a municipal corporation, cP F- ~4 9- 5 i 6 75 . SUMMARY JUDGMENT -* Plaintiff, . . ., California Revenue & Taxation vs. : Code, Section 3101 SYNERGY PROJECT MANAGEMENT, INC., Defendant. , Upon application of the Plaintiff to the Clerk for judgment pursuant to the provisions of California Revenue & Taxation Code, Section 3101, Judgment is entered in favor of Plaintiff CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN municipal corporation, to recover from Defendant SYNERGY PROJECT MANAGE INC., the sum of . Tax Principal $ 88,714.67 3 Tax Penalties $- 6,853.61 3 1.5% Addl. Penalties $ 29,584.10 y Total Judgment $ 125,152.38 au x q We Ss . * =O . Dated: JUL 12 2018 . Clerk of the Superior Court ° 3 a Beputy Clerk © — SUMMARY JUDGMENT; /CCSF v. SYNERGY PROJECT MANAGEMENT, INC]ae » PROOF OF SERVICE \ I, Debra Lew, am a citizen of the United States, over the age of eighteen years and not a party to the within entitled action. I am employed at the San Francisco Office of Treasurer and Tax Collector, 1 Dr. Carlton B. Goodlett Place, Rm. 110, San Francisco, California, 94102. On August 7, 2020, I served the attached: NOTICE OF LIEN on the interested parties in said action, by placing a true copy thereof in sealed envelope(s) addressed as follows: SYNERGY PROJECT MANAGEMENT, INC. 301 Crescent Court, Apt. #3409 San Francisco, CA 94134 Troutman Sanders LLP James P. Diwik and Ryan A. Lewis . Three Embarcadero Center, Ste. 800 San Francisco, CA 94111 «Javad Mirsaidi Agent for Service of Process, SYNERGY PROJECT MANAGEMENT, INC. - 301 Crescent Court, Apt. #3409 San Francisco, CA 94134 Johnny D. Knadler L/O of Johnny D. Knadler 1527 E. Pershing Dr. San Francisco, CA 94129 and served the named document in the manner indicated below: xX BY UNITED STATES MAIL: I sealed true and correct copies of the above documents in addressed envelope(s) with postage fully Prepaid and deposited sealed envelope(s) with the United States Postal Service. Oo BY PERSONAL SERVICE: I sealed true and correct copies of the above documents in addressed enyelope(s) and caused such envelope(s) to be delivered by hand at the above locations. I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the “foregoing is true and correct. Executed August 7, 2020; at San Francisco, California. Webra Lew ' Asst. Tax Collector Attorney PROOF OF SERVICE CASE NO. CGC-17-560034