On July 10, 2017 a
Order
was filed
involving a dispute between
City And County Of San Francisco,
City And County Of San Francisco (Consolidated,
Ghlotti Bros., Inc., A California Corporation,
Synergy Project Management, Inc.,
and
Breed, London,
City And County Of San Francisco,
Does 1-100,
Does 2-100, Et Al.,
Ghilotti Bros., Inc.,
Nuru, Mohammed,
San Francisco Department Of Public Works,
San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency,
San Francisco Public Utilities Commission,
for OTHER NON EXEMPT COMPLAINTS (Intentional interference with contractual relations)
in the District Court of San Francisco County.
Preview
27
28
‘TROUTMAN PEPPER
HAMILTON SANDERS LLP
SB EMBancaDeno Ceres, STE. 800
‘SAN Francisco, CA 94111
|
TROUTMAN PEPPER HAMILTON SANDERS LLP
JAMES P. DIWIK (State Bar No. 164016)
james.diwik@troutman.com
RYAN A. LEWIS (State Bar No. 307253)
ryan.lewis@troutman.com
Three Embarcadero Center, Suite 800
San Francisco, CA 94111
Telephone: 415.477.5700
Facsimile: 415.477.5710
Attorneys for Defendant/Plaintiff/Cross-Defendant
GHILOTTI BROS., INC.
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
CIVIL DIVISION
SYNERGY PROJECT MANAGEMENT, Case No. CGC-17-560034 [Consolidated with
INC., Case No. CGC-19-576488]
Plaintiff, [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
JOINT EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR
vs. STIPULATED TRIAL CONTINUANCE
OF TRIAL DATE
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN
FRANCISCO, SAN FRANCISCO Trial Date: August 23, 2021
PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION,
SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL
TRANSPORTATION AGENCY, SAN
FRANCISCO DEPARTMENT OF
PUBLIC WORKS, LONDON BREED,
MOHAMMED NURU, and DOES 1-100,
Defendants.
GHILOTTI BROS., INC., a California
Corporation,
Plaintiff,
Vv.
SYNERGY PROJECT MANAGEMENT,
INC., a California Corporation, and
DOES 1-30,
Defendants.
(PROPOSED) ORDER GRANTING JOINT EX PARTE APPLICATION TO CONTINUE TRIALSYNERGY PROJECT MANAGEMENT,
2 INC., a California Corporation,
3 Cross-Complainant,
Vv.
GHILOTTI BROS., INC., a California
Corporation, and ROES 1-20,
Cross-Defendants.
28
TROUTMAN PEPPER |
HAMILTON SANDERS LLP
‘3 EMBARCADERO CENTER, STE. 800 (rape) ORDER GRANTING JOINT EX PARTE APPLICATION TO CONTINUE TRIAL
SaNFRanaisco, CA 9411128
‘TROUTMAN PEPPER
HAMILTON SANDERS LLP
B EMsancaDEno CENTER, STE. 800
‘SAN FRANCISCO,CA 94111
Dated: Ae, a3 202)
The Court, having considered the stipulation of the parties and the parties’ joint ex parte
application for stipulated continuance of trial, and good cause appearing, orders as follows:
1. The parties’ ex parte application is GRANTED, and
2. The trial in this action set for August 23, 2021 is continued to
March + , 2022 at_ G.30 amJlpdh. in Dept. 206.
Consistent with the Court’s May 19, 2021 Order Granting in Part, Denying in Part
GNA St PLIotion of the partigs
Synergy Project Management, Inc.’s Motion to Continue the Trial Date, discovery is not re-
opened. All discovery, including written discovery and notices of deposition, that was timely
served prior to the discovery cut-off based upon the March 29, 2021 trial date in this matter will
remain open to allow for completion of that discovery including the motions to compel relating to
that discovery. . .
3. Ali further confinvances MUst be Sougitr by Noticed motion aly.
IT IS SO ORDERED
SEE NEXT PAGE
py: han Men! ran
Hon. Ame Civrshre (hageull >
Superior Court Judge
County of San Francisco
os vie
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING JOINT EX PARTE APPLICATION TO CONTINUE TRIALWO oN
THE COURT FURTHER ORDERS ALL PARTIES to call 415-551-3685 or e-mail the
court at Department206@sftc.org seven to fourteen days before the trial date and
provide the following information:
1.
2.
Party Name and Attorney Name (if represented)
Case Name and Number
Trial date and estimate of total trial time (including motions in limine and
jury selection)
Are you interested in a settlement conference on the day of trial?
Provide a brief description of the case, including damages. If calling,
description is limited to three minutes or less.
If the case has settled, is this a global settlement as to all parties and all
causes of action, and is the settlement conditional or unconditional?
Parties must appear on the day of trial unless a Dismissal, Notice of Settlement,
or Notice Stay is filed with courtesy copies delivered to Department 206 by 4:00 PM on
the Thursday before trial.
If the trial date is continued, this order applies to the new trial date. Failure to
comply with this order may result in monetary sanctions, C.C.P. §177.5.
DATE: J
24, WL Ch Der fhosnn —
HONORABLE ANNE-CHRISTINE MASSULLO
Judge of the Superior Court
Code FCC -I]- FOCOBY.
C
Preview
27 28 ‘TROUTMAN PEPPER HAMILTON SANDERS LLP SB EMBancaDeno Ceres, STE. 800 ‘SAN Francisco, CA 94111 | TROUTMAN PEPPER HAMILTON SANDERS LLP JAMES P. DIWIK (State Bar No. 164016) james.diwik@troutman.com RYAN A. LEWIS (State Bar No. 307253) ryan.lewis@troutman.com Three Embarcadero Center, Suite 800 San Francisco, CA 94111 Telephone: 415.477.5700 Facsimile: 415.477.5710 Attorneys for Defendant/Plaintiff/Cross-Defendant GHILOTTI BROS., INC. SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO CIVIL DIVISION SYNERGY PROJECT MANAGEMENT, Case No. CGC-17-560034 [Consolidated with INC., Case No. CGC-19-576488] Plaintiff, [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING JOINT EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR vs. STIPULATED TRIAL CONTINUANCE OF TRIAL DATE CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, SAN FRANCISCO Trial Date: August 23, 2021 PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION, SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL TRANSPORTATION AGENCY, SAN FRANCISCO DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS, LONDON BREED, MOHAMMED NURU, and DOES 1-100, Defendants. GHILOTTI BROS., INC., a California Corporation, Plaintiff, Vv. SYNERGY PROJECT MANAGEMENT, INC., a California Corporation, and DOES 1-30, Defendants. (PROPOSED) ORDER GRANTING JOINT EX PARTE APPLICATION TO CONTINUE TRIALSYNERGY PROJECT MANAGEMENT, 2 INC., a California Corporation, 3 Cross-Complainant, Vv. GHILOTTI BROS., INC., a California Corporation, and ROES 1-20, Cross-Defendants. 28 TROUTMAN PEPPER | HAMILTON SANDERS LLP ‘3 EMBARCADERO CENTER, STE. 800 (rape) ORDER GRANTING JOINT EX PARTE APPLICATION TO CONTINUE TRIAL SaNFRanaisco, CA 9411128 ‘TROUTMAN PEPPER HAMILTON SANDERS LLP B EMsancaDEno CENTER, STE. 800 ‘SAN FRANCISCO,CA 94111 Dated: Ae, a3 202) The Court, having considered the stipulation of the parties and the parties’ joint ex parte application for stipulated continuance of trial, and good cause appearing, orders as follows: 1. The parties’ ex parte application is GRANTED, and 2. The trial in this action set for August 23, 2021 is continued to March + , 2022 at_ G.30 amJlpdh. in Dept. 206. Consistent with the Court’s May 19, 2021 Order Granting in Part, Denying in Part GNA St PLIotion of the partigs Synergy Project Management, Inc.’s Motion to Continue the Trial Date, discovery is not re- opened. All discovery, including written discovery and notices of deposition, that was timely served prior to the discovery cut-off based upon the March 29, 2021 trial date in this matter will remain open to allow for completion of that discovery including the motions to compel relating to that discovery. . . 3. Ali further confinvances MUst be Sougitr by Noticed motion aly. IT IS SO ORDERED SEE NEXT PAGE py: han Men! ran Hon. Ame Civrshre (hageull > Superior Court Judge County of San Francisco os vie [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING JOINT EX PARTE APPLICATION TO CONTINUE TRIALWO oN THE COURT FURTHER ORDERS ALL PARTIES to call 415-551-3685 or e-mail the court at Department206@sftc.org seven to fourteen days before the trial date and provide the following information: 1. 2. Party Name and Attorney Name (if represented) Case Name and Number Trial date and estimate of total trial time (including motions in limine and jury selection) Are you interested in a settlement conference on the day of trial? Provide a brief description of the case, including damages. If calling, description is limited to three minutes or less. If the case has settled, is this a global settlement as to all parties and all causes of action, and is the settlement conditional or unconditional? Parties must appear on the day of trial unless a Dismissal, Notice of Settlement, or Notice Stay is filed with courtesy copies delivered to Department 206 by 4:00 PM on the Thursday before trial. If the trial date is continued, this order applies to the new trial date. Failure to comply with this order may result in monetary sanctions, C.C.P. §177.5. DATE: J 24, WL Ch Der fhosnn — HONORABLE ANNE-CHRISTINE MASSULLO Judge of the Superior Court Code FCC -I]- FOCOBY. C