On January 19, 2010 a
No Value
was filed
in the District Court of Oklahoma County.
Preview
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF OKLAHOMA COUNTY
STATE OF OKLAHOMA
TINKER FEDERAL CREDIT UNION _ )
)
Plaintiff, )
)
vs. ) Case No. CJ-2010-397
)
)
RUBY J. FRICK, )
)
Defendant. )
APPLICATION FOR HEARING ON ASSETS
Plaintiff, Tinker Federal Credit Union, shows the Court that a Judgment was
rendered in the above-entitled cause against the above-named Defendant, Ruby J. Frick,
(“Defendant”) against whom Judgment is unsatisfied, and the Plaintiff is accordingly
entitled to an Order of this Court requiring said Defendant, to appear and answer concerning
the property of Defendant, and forbidding a transfer or other disposition of the property of
Defendant. The Plaintiff is further accordingly entitled, after the hearing prayed for herein,
to an Order applying any property of Defendant not exempt by law, in its possession or
under its control toward the satisfaction of the Judgment; and the Judge may further order
Defendant, to pay to the Judgment creditor, or apply on the Judgment in installments, such
portion of the non-exempt income, however or wherever earned or acquired, of Defendant,
as the Court may deem proper after due regard for any payments required to be made by the
Defendant by virtue of law or prior Order of a Court, or under wage assignments
outstanding.
WHEREFORE, Plaintiff moves the Court to enter an Order requiring and directing
Ruby J. Frick, pursuant to this Court’s power to order the appearance of witnesses underOKLA. STAT. tit. 12, §§ 842, 848, and 849, to appear as directed by the Judge of this Court
at a specified time and place to answer questions propounded concerning the property of the
said Defendant and forbidding a transfer or other disposition of the property of Defendant.
The Plaintiff further moves this Court, after the hearing prayed for herein, for an Order
directing Defendant to pay the Plaintiff, or apply on the Judgment in installments, such
portion of the non-exempt property or income, however or wherever earned or acquired, of
Defendant, as the Court may deem proper after due regard for any payments required to be
made by Defendant by virtue of law or prior Order of a Court, or under wage assignment
outstanding.
Respectfully Submitted,
CE 5
Z Soa ma) BA #17822
RATX OGBEN HALL & LUDLAM, PLLC
A Professional Limited Liability Company
210 Park Avenue, Ste. 3030
Oklahoma City, OK 73102
(405) 232-3800
(405) 232-8999 facsimile
jeff@lawoke.com
Document Filed Date
January 30, 2013
Case Filing Date
January 19, 2010
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.