arrow left
arrow right
  • BRYANT FU ET AL VS. TINA YAN ET AL OTHER NON EXEMPT COMPLAINTS (VERIFIED COMPLAINT FOR FRAUDULENT TRANSFERS AND CONSPIRACY TO DEFRAUD) document preview
  • BRYANT FU ET AL VS. TINA YAN ET AL OTHER NON EXEMPT COMPLAINTS (VERIFIED COMPLAINT FOR FRAUDULENT TRANSFERS AND CONSPIRACY TO DEFRAUD) document preview
  • BRYANT FU ET AL VS. TINA YAN ET AL OTHER NON EXEMPT COMPLAINTS (VERIFIED COMPLAINT FOR FRAUDULENT TRANSFERS AND CONSPIRACY TO DEFRAUD) document preview
  • BRYANT FU ET AL VS. TINA YAN ET AL OTHER NON EXEMPT COMPLAINTS (VERIFIED COMPLAINT FOR FRAUDULENT TRANSFERS AND CONSPIRACY TO DEFRAUD) document preview
						
                                

Preview

Leeds Disston, Esq. SBN 045016 1 CASALINA & DISSTON 2 409 13th Street, 9th Floor ELECTRONICALLY Oakland, CA 94612 F I L E D 3 (510) 835-8110 Telephone Superior Court of California, County of San Francisco (510) 835-8113 Facsimile 4 casdiss@yahoo.com 07/14/2022 Clerk of the Court 5 BY: RONNIE OTERO Attorney for defendants Deputy Clerk 6 TINA YAN, THAI MING CHIU, and KAMAN LIU 7 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA 8 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO UNLIMITED CIVIL JURISDICTION 9 10 BRYANT FU and CRYSTAL LEI, Case No.: CGC-17-556769 11 Plaintiffs, DEFENDANTS’ SEPARATE STATEMENT 12 vs. OF UNDISPUTED MATERIAL FACTS IN TINA YAN et al., 13 SUPPORT OF OPPOSITION TO Defendants. PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY 14 ADJUDICATION ON FIRST CAUSE OF _____________________________________ ACTION 15 and RELATED CROSS-COMPLAINT. 16 Date: July 29, 2022 17 Time: 9:30 am Dept.: 501 18 The Hon. Charles F. Haines 19 Defendants’ TINA YAN, THAI MING CHIU, and KAMAN LIU (Defendants) hereby submit 20 this separate statement of UNDISPUTED MATERIAL FACTS in opposition to PLAINTIFFS' 21 MOTION FOR SUMMARY ADJUDICATION ON FIRST CAUSE OF ACTION. 22 23 Issue 1 – Transferee Defendants Are Liable For Yan’s Fraudulent Transfer Of The Subject 24 Property To Them With The Intent To Hinder, Delay Or Defraud Yan’s Creditors 25 26 27 28 - 1 1 Opposing Party’s (Defendants) Material Facts Moving Party’s (Plaintiffs) Response in and Supporting Evidence Opposition and Supporting Evidence 2 1. The transfer of the Subject Property to 547 3 23rd Avenue, LLC was set aside on 2016-06- 24. 4 Evidence: 5 Judgment Setting Aside Fraudulent Transfers 6 (CGC14537574, LI v. CHIU et al.) [Defendants RJN, Ex. 1, RJN-2 at par. E.] 7 2. The transfers of 547 23rd Avenue, LLC 8 membership interests to Defendants were set aside on 2016-06-24. 9 10 Evidence: Judgment Setting Aside Fraudulent Transfers 11 (CGC14537574, LI v. CHIU et al.) [Defendants RJN, Ex. 1, RJN-3 at par. F.] 12 3. The transfer of the Subject Property from 13 547 23rd Avenue, LLC to 547 Investments, LLC was set aside on 2016-06-24. 14 15 Evidence: Judgment Setting Aside Fraudulent Transfers 16 (CGC14537574, LI v. CHIU et al.) [Defendants RJN, Ex. 1, RJN-3 at par. G.] 17 4. Yan was the sole owner of the Subject 18 Property at the time of commencement of this 19 action by plaintiffs’ complaint filed on January 31, 2017. 20 Evidence: 21 Judgment Setting Aside Fraudulent Transfers 22 (CGC14537574, LI v. CHIU et al.) [Defendants RJN, Ex. 1, at pars. E-H.] 23 24 25 Dated: 7/14/2022 26 /s/Leeds Disston, Esq. 27 28 - 2