On April 06, 2018 a
Party Notice
was filed
involving a dispute between
Jacqueline Misho,
and
Cat Cora, Inc,
Cora, Catherine Ann,
for Unlimited Other Collections (09)
in the District Court of Santa Barbara County.
Preview
ELECTRONICALLY FILED
Superior Court of California
1 Jacqueline Misho County of Santa Barbara
MISHO LAW GROUP
Darrel E. Parker, Executive Officer
2 211 East Victoria Street, Suite E
5/9/2022 10:09 AM
Santa Barbara, California 93101
By: Leili Hejazi, Deputy
3 Telephone (805) 965-3405
jmisho@MishoLaw.com
4 State Bar #101112
5
Attorneys for Plaintiff
6
7 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
8 FOR THE COUNTY OF SANTA BARBARA
9 ANACAPA DIVISION
10
11 ) Case No. 18CV01749
)
12 JACQUELINE MISHO dba MISHO LAW ) NOTICE OF CONTINUANCE OF
GROUP ) CASE MANAGEMENT
13 ) CONFERENCE
)
14 Plaintiff, )
)
15 vs. )
)
16 CATHERINE ANN (“CAT”) CORA, CAT )
17 CORA, INC., ET AL, ) Assigned: The Honorable
) Colleen K. Sterne
18 Defendants. )
______________________________________
19
20 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the Case Management Conference of the above-captioned
21 case has been continued to August 1, 2022 at 8:30 a.m. in Department Six(6) of the above-
Dept 5 LH
22 entitled Court.
23
24
25
26 Dated: May 9, 2022
27
28
1
NOTICE OF CONTINUANCE OF CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
Misho v. Cora Case No. 18CV01749
1
PROOF OF SERVICE
2
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF SANTA BARBARA
3
I am employed in the county of Santa Barbara, State of California. I am over the age of
4 eighteen (18) and not a party to the within action. My business address is 211 East Victoria
Street, Suite E, Santa Barbara, California 93101.
5
On May 9, 2022 I served the foregoing document(s):
6
NOTICE OF CONTINUANCE OF CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
7
on the interested parties by:
8
X By placing true copies thereof enclosed in a sealed envelope addressed as follows:
9
David H. Friedman
10 Friedman & Friedman
9454 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 313
11 Beverly Hills, CA 90212-2904
david@f-f-law.com
12
X (BY MAIL) I am "readily familiar" with the firm's practice of collection and processing
13 correspondence for mailing. Under that practice it would be deposited with U.S. postal
service on that same day with postage thereon fully prepaid at Santa Barbara, California
14 in the ordinary course of business. I am aware that on motion of the party served, service
is presumed invalid if postal cancellation date or postage meter date is more than one day
15 after date of deposit for mailing in affidavit.
16 X (BY ELECTRONIC MAIL) On May 9, 2022, I served the above-described
document(s) on the interested parties in this action by electronic email from email
17 address skim@MishoLaw.com. I caused said transmission to be sent by email to the
email addresses listed above from my computer maintained by Misho Law Group.
18 The email transmission was reported as complete and without error.
19 ☐ (BY PERSONAL SERVICE) I caused said document(s) to be delivered by hand to
addressee.
20
Executed on May 9, 2022 in Santa Barbara, California.
21
X (State) I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that
22 the above is true and correct.
23 ☐ (Federal) I declare that I am employed in the office of a member of the bar of this Court
at whose direction the service was made.
24
25
26
27
1
PROOF OF SERVICE
Document Filed Date
May 09, 2022
Case Filing Date
April 06, 2018
Category
Unlimited Other Collections (09)
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.