arrow left
arrow right
  • Deborah Kelly Garland Peric  vs.  Lotus Hospitality II, Inc., et al(23) Unlimited Other PI/PD/WD document preview
  • Deborah Kelly Garland Peric  vs.  Lotus Hospitality II, Inc., et al(23) Unlimited Other PI/PD/WD document preview
  • Deborah Kelly Garland Peric  vs.  Lotus Hospitality II, Inc., et al(23) Unlimited Other PI/PD/WD document preview
  • Deborah Kelly Garland Peric  vs.  Lotus Hospitality II, Inc., et al(23) Unlimited Other PI/PD/WD document preview
						
                                

Preview

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN MATEO ORDER VACATING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE, AS THE ACTION IS “AT ISSUE” AND CASE IS ORDERED TO ADR FILED In the Matter of: Deborah Kelly Garland Peric vs. Lotus SAN MATEO COUNTY Hospitality II, Inc., et al 3/3/2022 By /s/ Liliana Cervantes Case Number: 21-CIV-04971 ADR Program Analyst TO ALL PARTIES AND THEIR COUNSEL OF RECORD: THE COURT FINDS as follows: An initial Case Management Conference was previously ordered and scheduled for 03/17/2022 in this action. Pursuant to Rule 3.722(d) of the California Rules of Court, based upon the Court’s review of the filed Case Management Statement(s) and the docket of this action, the Court determines that appearances at the Conference are not necessary at this time, as this action is “at issue”; and determines that the Case Management Conference should be vacated as all parties have indicated in their Case Management Statements that they are agreeable to participating in the ADR Process - Mediation. In accordance with Local Rules 3.805 and 3.904(b), all parties referred to ADR must complete a Stipulation and Order to ADR (ADR-CV-1), and file it with the Clerk of the Superior Court. In accordance with Local Rule 2.1.7, all parties, except for self-represented litigants, are required to file the Stipulation and Order to ADR electronically. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows: 1. The initial Case Management Conference is VACATED. 2. No later than 21 days from the date of this Order, parties must complete and sign a Stipulation and Order to ADR (ADR-CV-1), and file it with the Clerk of the Superior Court, pursuant to Local Rule 3.904(b). 3. The Mediation shall be completed no later than 90 days from the date of this Order. 4. Pursuant to Local Rule 0.2, Local Rule 3.805(h), and CRC Rule 2.30, the Court is empowered to impose monetary sanctions of a minimum of $150.00 upon any party or their counsel for failure to follow the requirements of this Order, or of the California Rules of Court, or of the Code of Civil Procedure. If you fail to follow the requirements of this Order, you will be subject to an order to show cause as to why monetary sanctions of $150.00, or some other amount, should not be imposed against you. 5. PLAINTIFF(S) must serve this Order on all parties not listed on the Court’s proof of service within five (5) days of the date of this Order. DATED: 3/3/2022 Ernst A. Halperin Honorable Ernst A. Halperin, CIVIL COMMISSIONER SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN MATEO COUNTY 400 County Center, Redwood City, CA 94063 (650) 261-5100 www.sanmateocourt.org AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING Date: 3/3/2022 In the Matter of: Deborah Kelly Garland Peric vs. Lotus Hospitality II, Inc., et al Case Number: 21-CIV-04971 I declare under penalty of perjury that on the following date I deposited in the United States Post Office mail box at Redwood City, a true copy of the attached document(s) order continuing case management conference, enclosed in an envelope, with proper and necessary postage thereon, and addressed to the following: Executed on: 3/3/2022 Neal I Taniguchi, Court Executive Officer/Clerk By: /s/ Liliana Cervantes Liliana Cervantes, ADR Program Analyst Copies mailed to: NIKOLAUS W REED PIER 40 SUITE 7 SAN FRANCISCO CA 94107 SAMUEL LEFF STRATMAN & WILLIAMS-ABREGO PO BOX 258829 OKLAHOMA CITY OK 73125