On September 14, 2021 a
ADR Referral
was filed
involving a dispute between
Peric, Deborah Kelly Garland,
and
Does 1 To 50,
Lotus Hospitality Ii, Inc.,
for (23) Unlimited Other PI/PD/WD
in the District Court of San Mateo County.
Preview
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF SAN MATEO
ORDER VACATING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE,
AS THE ACTION IS “AT ISSUE” AND CASE IS ORDERED TO ADR FILED
In the Matter of: Deborah Kelly Garland Peric vs. Lotus SAN MATEO COUNTY
Hospitality II, Inc., et al 3/3/2022
By /s/ Liliana Cervantes
Case Number: 21-CIV-04971 ADR Program Analyst
TO ALL PARTIES AND THEIR COUNSEL OF RECORD:
THE COURT FINDS as follows:
An initial Case Management Conference was previously ordered and scheduled for 03/17/2022
in this action.
Pursuant to Rule 3.722(d) of the California Rules of Court, based upon the Court’s review of
the filed Case Management Statement(s) and the docket of this action, the Court determines that
appearances at the Conference are not necessary at this time, as this action is “at issue”; and
determines that the Case Management Conference should be vacated as all parties have indicated in
their Case Management Statements that they are agreeable to participating in the ADR Process -
Mediation.
In accordance with Local Rules 3.805 and 3.904(b), all parties referred to ADR must complete a
Stipulation and Order to ADR (ADR-CV-1), and file it with the Clerk of the Superior Court. In
accordance with Local Rule 2.1.7, all parties, except for self-represented litigants, are required to file
the Stipulation and Order to ADR electronically.
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows:
1. The initial Case Management Conference is VACATED.
2. No later than 21 days from the date of this Order, parties must complete and sign a
Stipulation and Order to ADR (ADR-CV-1), and file it with the Clerk of the Superior Court, pursuant to
Local Rule 3.904(b).
3. The Mediation shall be completed no later than 90 days from the date of this Order.
4. Pursuant to Local Rule 0.2, Local Rule 3.805(h), and CRC Rule 2.30, the Court is empowered
to impose monetary sanctions of a minimum of $150.00 upon any party or their counsel for failure to
follow the requirements of this Order, or of the California Rules of Court, or of the Code of Civil
Procedure. If you fail to follow the requirements of this Order, you will be subject to an order to show
cause as to why monetary sanctions of $150.00, or some other amount, should not be imposed against
you.
5. PLAINTIFF(S) must serve this Order on all parties not listed on the Court’s proof of service
within five (5) days of the date of this Order.
DATED: 3/3/2022 Ernst A. Halperin
Honorable Ernst A. Halperin, CIVIL COMMISSIONER
SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN MATEO COUNTY
400 County Center, Redwood City, CA 94063
(650) 261-5100
www.sanmateocourt.org
AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING
Date: 3/3/2022
In the Matter of: Deborah Kelly Garland Peric vs. Lotus Hospitality II, Inc., et al
Case Number: 21-CIV-04971
I declare under penalty of perjury that on the following date I deposited in the United States Post
Office mail box at Redwood City, a true copy of the attached document(s) order continuing case
management conference, enclosed in an envelope, with proper and necessary postage thereon, and
addressed to the following:
Executed on: 3/3/2022
Neal I Taniguchi, Court Executive Officer/Clerk
By: /s/ Liliana Cervantes
Liliana Cervantes, ADR Program Analyst
Copies mailed to:
NIKOLAUS W REED PIER 40 SUITE 7
SAN FRANCISCO CA 94107
SAMUEL LEFF STRATMAN & WILLIAMS-ABREGO
PO BOX 258829
OKLAHOMA CITY OK 73125
Document Filed Date
March 03, 2022
Case Filing Date
September 14, 2021
Category
(23) Unlimited Other PI/PD/WD
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.