On September 09, 2008 a
Order
was filed
involving a dispute between
and
for OTHER CIVIL, TEMP RESTRAINING ORDER/INJUNCTION
in the District Court of Tarrant County.
Preview
CAUSE NO. 153-232668-08
VIRGINIA 0. KINSEL, ET AL. § IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF
§
v. § TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS
§
JANE 0. LINDSEY, ET AL. § 153rd JUDICIAL DISTRICT
ORDER GRANTING NO EVIDENC
MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGM
On April 4, 2012, the Court heard Defendants a
Robert N. Oliver's No EvidenceMotionfor Summary .!A
Afer considering the Motion, Plaintiffs' Respo se, Defendants' Reply, the
applicable law, and arguments of counsel, th Court is of the opinion that the
Motion should be GRANTED.
Robert N. Oliver are entitled to su ary judgment on all claims asserted against
them by Plaintiffs.
IT IS FURTHER 0 ERED that Plaintiffs take nothing on their claims
against Defendants and at all such claims be dismissed with prejudice.
-I ~
:I: c::> --i
0 ;:::; '):>
Any other reli not expressly granted here in denied. ~ 3:
(,/')-
:JOo
-o
:::0
:::0
--4 ....- :::::0J:" ""Tl
~(/)
~- 0
::.sr=
_,
....- C")fTI
(") • -o oCl
•:e
~""'~-
:X
i'i
c
z
~· •• -1
--------------------------------------------------~---~--~.~.
ORDER GRANTING NO EVIDENCE MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT Page 1 \).]\
SIGNED this ___ day of _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ , 2012.
JUDGE PRESIDING
ORDER GRANTING No EVIDENCE MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT Page 2
G:\Klckmo.n ... lJUA\IIIl.F~~'Il.INIJSEY od\. KINSEL\I'LEA[)[NGl>"\ORI>ER GRArrriNG NO •:VIIlENCI:: JI\SJ.wptl
Document Filed Date
April 10, 2012
Case Filing Date
September 09, 2008
Category
OTHER CIVIL, TEMP RESTRAINING ORDER/INJUNCTION
Status
DISMISSED OR NON-SUITED
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Preview
CAUSE NO. 153-232668-08 VIRGINIA 0. KINSEL, ET AL. § IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF § v. § TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS § JANE 0. LINDSEY, ET AL. § 153rd JUDICIAL DISTRICT ORDER GRANTING NO EVIDENC MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGM On April 4, 2012, the Court heard Defendants a Robert N. Oliver's No EvidenceMotionfor Summary .!A Afer considering the Motion, Plaintiffs' Respo se, Defendants' Reply, the applicable law, and arguments of counsel, th Court is of the opinion that the Motion should be GRANTED. Robert N. Oliver are entitled to su ary judgment on all claims asserted against them by Plaintiffs. IT IS FURTHER 0 ERED that Plaintiffs take nothing on their claims against Defendants and at all such claims be dismissed with prejudice. -I ~ :I: c::> --i 0 ;:::; '):> Any other reli not expressly granted here in denied. ~ 3: (,/')- :JOo -o :::0 :::0 --4 ....- :::::0J:" ""Tl ~(/) ~- 0 ::.sr= _, ....- C")fTI (") • -o oCl •:e ~""'~- :X i'i c z ~· •• -1 --------------------------------------------------~---~--~.~. ORDER GRANTING NO EVIDENCE MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT Page 1 \).]\ SIGNED this ___ day of _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ , 2012. JUDGE PRESIDING ORDER GRANTING No EVIDENCE MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT Page 2 G:\Klckmo.n ... lJUA\IIIl.F~~'Il.INIJSEY od\. KINSEL\I'LEA[)[NGl>"\ORI>ER GRArrriNG NO •:VIIlENCI:: JI\SJ.wptl