Preview
CM-015
ATTORNEY OR PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY (Name, State Bar number. and address):
FOR COURT USE ONLY
JOHN L. SUPPLE (SBN: 94582) ; ROBERT R. DEERING (SBN : 258043)
MADELEINE LOUGH-STEVENS (SBN : 323789)
TELEPHONE NO.: ( 415)
366-5533 (415) 480-6301
FAX NO. (Optional).
ELECTRONICALLY
F I L E D
rdeerinq@isupplelaw.com; mlough-stevens@jsupplelaw.com
E-MAIL A DDRESS (OPTIONAL/:
Defendants DANIELLE LANE, M.D., MARK FAN, M.D., AND DANIELLE E.
ATTORNEY FOR (Name):
LANE , M.D., INC. OBA LANE FERTILITY INSTITUTE Superior Court of California,
County of San Francisco
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 01/14/2020
STREET ADDRESS: 400 McAllister St. Clerk of the Court
MAILING ADDRESS: same BY: DAVID YUEN
Deputy Clerk
c1TY A ND z1P coDE San Francisco, CA 94102
BRA NCH NAME:
CASE NUMBER:
PLAINTIFFS/PETITIONERS: PATRICK WILLIAMS RODRIGUEZ and CLAUDIOUS
WILLIAMS RODRIGUEZ, individuals CGC-19-580309
DEFENDANTS/RESPONDENTS: DANIELLE E. LANE, M.D., an individual, et al. JUDICIAL OFFICER:
DEPT.:
NOTICE OF RELATED CASE
Identify, in chronological order according to date of filing, all cases related to the case referenced above.
Freitas v.
1. a. Title : Danielle E. Lane, M.D., et al.
b. Case number: CGC-19-580659
c. Court:[8] same as above
D other state or federal court (name and address):
d. Department:
e. Case type: D limited civil [8] unlimited civil D probate D family law D ___ other (specify) :
f. Filing date:November 8, 2019
g. Has this case been designated or determined as "complex?" D Yes [8] No
h. Relationship of this case to the case referenced above (check all that apply):
[8]involves the same parties and is based on the same or similar claims.
[8] arises from the same or substantially identical transactions, incidents, or events requiring the determination of
the same or substantially identical questions of law or fact.
D involves claims against, title to, possession of, or damages to the same property.
D is likely for other reasons to require substantial duplication of judicial resources if heard by different judges.
D Additional explanation is attached in attachment 1h
i. Status of case:
[8] Pending
D Dismissed D with D without prejudice
D Disposed of by judgment
2. a. Title:
b. Case number:
c. Court:D same as above
D other state or federal court (name and address):
d. Department:
Page I of 3
Form Adopted for Optional Use
Judicial Counci l of California
NOTICE OF RELATED CASE Cal. Rules of Court, rule 3.300
www.co11rtinfo.ca.gov
CM-015 [Rev. July I, 2007]
CM-015
PLAINTIFFS/PETITIONERS: PATRICK WILLIAMS RODRIGUEZ and CLAUDIOUS WILLIAMS CASE NUMBER:
RODRIGUEZ, individuals CGC-19-580309
DEFENDANTS/RESPONDENTS: DANIELLE E. LANE, M.D., an individual, et al.
2. (continued)
e. Case type : D limited civilD unlimited civilD probate D family law D other (specify):
f. Filing date:
g. Has this case been designated or determined as "complex?" D Yes D No
h. Relationship of this case to the case referenced above (check all that apply):
D involves the same parties and is based on the same or similar claims.
D arises from the same or substantially identical transactions, incidents, or events requiring the determination of
the same or substantially identical questions of law or fact.
D involves claims against, title to, possession of, or damages to the same property .
D is likely for other reasons to require substantial duplication of judicial resources if heard by different judges.
D Additional explanation is attached in attachment 2h
i. Status of case :
D pending
D dismissed D with D without prejudice
D disposed of by judgment
3. a. Title:
b. Case number:
c. Court:[8] same as above
D other state or federal court (name and address):
d. Department:
e. Case type: D limited civilD unlimited civilD probate D family law D other (specify):
h. Filing date:
f. Has this case been designated or determined as "complex?" D Yes D No
h. Relationship of this case to the case referenced above (check all that apply):
D involves the same parties and is based on the same or similar claims.
D arises from the same or substantially identical transactions, incidents, or events requ'iring the determination of
the same or substantially identical questions of law or fact.
D involves claims against, title to, possession of, or damages to the same property.
D is likely for other reasons to require substantial duplication of judicial resources if heard by different judges.
D Additional explanation is attached in attachment 2h
i. Status of case:
D pending
D dismissed 0 with D without prejudice
D disposed of by judgment
4. D Additional related cases are described in Attachment 4. Number of pages
Date: \ I '1 l;:>-U:, â–º
, J SUPPLE LAW, PC
(TYPE OR PRINT NAME of PARTY OR ATTORNEY
Page 2 ofJ
CM-015 [Rev. July I,
2007]
NOTICE OF RELATED CASE
CM-015
PLAINTIFFS/PETITIONERS: PATRICK WILLIAMS RODRIGUEZ and CLAUDIOUS CASE NUMBER
WILLIAMS RODRIGUEZ, individuals CGC-19-580309
DEFENDANTS/RESPONDENTS: DANIELLE E. LANE, M.D., an individual, et al.
PROOF OF SERVICE BY FIRST CLASS MAIL
NOTICE OF RELATED CASE
(NOTE: You cannot serve the Notice of Settlement of Entire Case if you are a party in the action. The person who served the
notice must complete this proof of service.)
1. I am at least 18 years old and not a party to this action.I am a resident of or employed in the county where the mailing took
place, and my residence or business address is (specify):
2. I served a copy of the Notice of Related Case by enclosing it in a sealed envelope with postage fully prepaid
and (check one):
a. D deposited the sealed envelope with the United States Postal Service.
b. D placed the sealed envelope for collection and processing for mailing, following this business's usual practices, with which
I am readily familiar.On the same day correspondence is placed for collections and mailing, it is deposited in the
ordinary course of business with the United States Postal Service.
3. The Notice of Settlement of Entire Case was mailed:
a. on (date):
b. from (city and state):
4. The envelope was addressed and mailed as follows:
a. Name of person served: c. Name of person served:
Street address: Street address:
City: City:
State and zip code: State and zip code:
b. Name of person served: d. Name of person served:
Street address: Street address:
City: City:
State and zip code: State and zip code:
D Names and addresses of additional persons served are attached. (You may use form POS-030(P).)
5. Number of pages attached:
I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct.
Date:
(TYPE OR PRINT NAME OF DECLARANT)
â–º (SIGNATURE OF DECLARANT)
Page 2 of3
CM-015 [Rev. July 1,
2007]
NOTICE OF RELATED CASE
1 Re: Rodriguez v. Danielle E. Lane, MD., et al.
San Francisco County Superior Court Case No: CGC-19-580309
2
3 PROOF OF SERVICE
4 I am a resident of the State of California, over the age of eighteen years, and not a party
to the within action. My business address is J SUPPLE LAW, PC, 990 Fifth Avenue, San
5 Rafael, CA 94901 . On the date indicated below, I served the within document:
6 NOTICE OF RELATED CASE
7 D by placing a true copy thereof enclosed in a sealed envelope, at a station designated
for collection and processing of envelopes and packages for overnight delivery by
8
FedEx as part of the ordinary business practices of J SUPPLE LAW, PC described
9 below, addressed as follows :
10 D by placing a true copy thereof enclosed in a sealed envelope, at a station designated
for collection and processing of envelopes and packages for overnight delivery by
11 Golden State Overnight as part of the ordinary business practices of J SUPPLE
LAW, PC described below, addressed as follows:
,..., 12
u 0
~
~
Qi
...,.
0\
::, 13 ~ by placing the document(s) listed above in a sealed envelope with postage thereon
~ 5 0\
fully prepaid, in United States Mail in the State of California at San Rafael,
<;.-<
<
,.;i u 14 addressed as set forth below.
~ -=it:
,.;i
...:
Qi
~~.;'.:
~o~ 15 Attorneys for Plaintiffs
:;;;i
0\
= Nancy Hersh, Esq.
..,
en °' c,s
en 16 Kate Hersh-Boyle, Esq .
Montana Baker, Esq.
17 HERSH and HERSH
601 Van Ness Avenue, Suite 2080
18 San Francisco, CA 94102
Tel: (415) 441-5544
19 Fax: (415) 441-7586
Email:
20
I am readily familiar with the firm's practice of collection and processing correspondence
21 for mailing. Under that practice it would be deposited with the U.S. Postal Service on that same
day with postage thereon fully prepaid in the ordinary course of business. I am aware that on
22 motion of the party served, service is presumed invalid if postal cancellation date or postage
meter date is more than one day after the date of deposit for mailing in affidavit.
23
I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the above
24 is true and correct.
25 Executed on January J±_, 2020, at San Rafael, California.
26
27
28
-1 -
PROOF OF SERVICE
Preview
CM-015 ATTORNEY OR PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY (Name, State Bar number. and address): FOR COURT USE ONLY JOHN L. SUPPLE (SBN: 94582) ; ROBERT R. DEERING (SBN : 258043) MADELEINE LOUGH-STEVENS (SBN : 323789) TELEPHONE NO.: ( 415) 366-5533 (415) 480-6301 FAX NO. (Optional). ELECTRONICALLY F I L E D rdeerinq@isupplelaw.com; mlough-stevens@jsupplelaw.com E-MAIL A DDRESS (OPTIONAL/: Defendants DANIELLE LANE, M.D., MARK FAN, M.D., AND DANIELLE E. ATTORNEY FOR (Name): LANE , M.D., INC. OBA LANE FERTILITY INSTITUTE Superior Court of California, County of San Francisco SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 01/14/2020 STREET ADDRESS: 400 McAllister St. Clerk of the Court MAILING ADDRESS: same BY: DAVID YUEN Deputy Clerk c1TY A ND z1P coDE San Francisco, CA 94102 BRA NCH NAME: CASE NUMBER: PLAINTIFFS/PETITIONERS: PATRICK WILLIAMS RODRIGUEZ and CLAUDIOUS WILLIAMS RODRIGUEZ, individuals CGC-19-580309 DEFENDANTS/RESPONDENTS: DANIELLE E. LANE, M.D., an individual, et al. JUDICIAL OFFICER: DEPT.: NOTICE OF RELATED CASE Identify, in chronological order according to date of filing, all cases related to the case referenced above. Freitas v. 1. a. Title : Danielle E. Lane, M.D., et al. b. Case number: CGC-19-580659 c. Court:[8] same as above D other state or federal court (name and address): d. Department: e. Case type: D limited civil [8] unlimited civil D probate D family law D ___ other (specify) : f. Filing date:November 8, 2019 g. Has this case been designated or determined as "complex?" D Yes [8] No h. Relationship of this case to the case referenced above (check all that apply): [8]involves the same parties and is based on the same or similar claims. [8] arises from the same or substantially identical transactions, incidents, or events requiring the determination of the same or substantially identical questions of law or fact. D involves claims against, title to, possession of, or damages to the same property. D is likely for other reasons to require substantial duplication of judicial resources if heard by different judges. D Additional explanation is attached in attachment 1h i. Status of case: [8] Pending D Dismissed D with D without prejudice D Disposed of by judgment 2. a. Title: b. Case number: c. Court:D same as above D other state or federal court (name and address): d. Department: Page I of 3 Form Adopted for Optional Use Judicial Counci l of California NOTICE OF RELATED CASE Cal. Rules of Court, rule 3.300 www.co11rtinfo.ca.gov CM-015 [Rev. July I, 2007] CM-015 PLAINTIFFS/PETITIONERS: PATRICK WILLIAMS RODRIGUEZ and CLAUDIOUS WILLIAMS CASE NUMBER: RODRIGUEZ, individuals CGC-19-580309 DEFENDANTS/RESPONDENTS: DANIELLE E. LANE, M.D., an individual, et al. 2. (continued) e. Case type : D limited civilD unlimited civilD probate D family law D other (specify): f. Filing date: g. Has this case been designated or determined as "complex?" D Yes D No h. Relationship of this case to the case referenced above (check all that apply): D involves the same parties and is based on the same or similar claims. D arises from the same or substantially identical transactions, incidents, or events requiring the determination of the same or substantially identical questions of law or fact. D involves claims against, title to, possession of, or damages to the same property . D is likely for other reasons to require substantial duplication of judicial resources if heard by different judges. D Additional explanation is attached in attachment 2h i. Status of case : D pending D dismissed D with D without prejudice D disposed of by judgment 3. a. Title: b. Case number: c. Court:[8] same as above D other state or federal court (name and address): d. Department: e. Case type: D limited civilD unlimited civilD probate D family law D other (specify): h. Filing date: f. Has this case been designated or determined as "complex?" D Yes D No h. Relationship of this case to the case referenced above (check all that apply): D involves the same parties and is based on the same or similar claims. D arises from the same or substantially identical transactions, incidents, or events requ'iring the determination of the same or substantially identical questions of law or fact. D involves claims against, title to, possession of, or damages to the same property. D is likely for other reasons to require substantial duplication of judicial resources if heard by different judges. D Additional explanation is attached in attachment 2h i. Status of case: D pending D dismissed 0 with D without prejudice D disposed of by judgment 4. D Additional related cases are described in Attachment 4. Number of pages Date: \ I '1 l;:>-U:, ► , J SUPPLE LAW, PC (TYPE OR PRINT NAME of PARTY OR ATTORNEY Page 2 ofJ CM-015 [Rev. July I, 2007] NOTICE OF RELATED CASE CM-015 PLAINTIFFS/PETITIONERS: PATRICK WILLIAMS RODRIGUEZ and CLAUDIOUS CASE NUMBER WILLIAMS RODRIGUEZ, individuals CGC-19-580309 DEFENDANTS/RESPONDENTS: DANIELLE E. LANE, M.D., an individual, et al. PROOF OF SERVICE BY FIRST CLASS MAIL NOTICE OF RELATED CASE (NOTE: You cannot serve the Notice of Settlement of Entire Case if you are a party in the action. The person who served the notice must complete this proof of service.) 1. I am at least 18 years old and not a party to this action.I am a resident of or employed in the county where the mailing took place, and my residence or business address is (specify): 2. I served a copy of the Notice of Related Case by enclosing it in a sealed envelope with postage fully prepaid and (check one): a. D deposited the sealed envelope with the United States Postal Service. b. D placed the sealed envelope for collection and processing for mailing, following this business's usual practices, with which I am readily familiar.On the same day correspondence is placed for collections and mailing, it is deposited in the ordinary course of business with the United States Postal Service. 3. The Notice of Settlement of Entire Case was mailed: a. on (date): b. from (city and state): 4. The envelope was addressed and mailed as follows: a. Name of person served: c. Name of person served: Street address: Street address: City: City: State and zip code: State and zip code: b. Name of person served: d. Name of person served: Street address: Street address: City: City: State and zip code: State and zip code: D Names and addresses of additional persons served are attached. (You may use form POS-030(P).) 5. Number of pages attached: I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct. Date: (TYPE OR PRINT NAME OF DECLARANT) ► (SIGNATURE OF DECLARANT) Page 2 of3 CM-015 [Rev. July 1, 2007] NOTICE OF RELATED CASE 1 Re: Rodriguez v. Danielle E. Lane, MD., et al. San Francisco County Superior Court Case No: CGC-19-580309 2 3 PROOF OF SERVICE 4 I am a resident of the State of California, over the age of eighteen years, and not a party to the within action. My business address is J SUPPLE LAW, PC, 990 Fifth Avenue, San 5 Rafael, CA 94901 . On the date indicated below, I served the within document: 6 NOTICE OF RELATED CASE 7 D by placing a true copy thereof enclosed in a sealed envelope, at a station designated for collection and processing of envelopes and packages for overnight delivery by 8 FedEx as part of the ordinary business practices of J SUPPLE LAW, PC described 9 below, addressed as follows : 10 D by placing a true copy thereof enclosed in a sealed envelope, at a station designated for collection and processing of envelopes and packages for overnight delivery by 11 Golden State Overnight as part of the ordinary business practices of J SUPPLE LAW, PC described below, addressed as follows: ,..., 12 u 0 ~ ~ Qi ...,. 0\ ::, 13 ~ by placing the document(s) listed above in a sealed envelope with postage thereon ~ 5 0\ fully prepaid, in United States Mail in the State of California at San Rafael, <;.-< < ,.;i u 14 addressed as set forth below. ~ -=it: ,.;i ...: Qi ~~.;'.: ~o~ 15 Attorneys for Plaintiffs :;;;i 0\ = Nancy Hersh, Esq. .., en °' c,s en 16 Kate Hersh-Boyle, Esq . Montana Baker, Esq. 17 HERSH and HERSH 601 Van Ness Avenue, Suite 2080 18 San Francisco, CA 94102 Tel: (415) 441-5544 19 Fax: (415) 441-7586 Email: 20 I am readily familiar with the firm's practice of collection and processing correspondence 21 for mailing. Under that practice it would be deposited with the U.S. Postal Service on that same day with postage thereon fully prepaid in the ordinary course of business. I am aware that on 22 motion of the party served, service is presumed invalid if postal cancellation date or postage meter date is more than one day after the date of deposit for mailing in affidavit. 23 I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the above 24 is true and correct. 25 Executed on January J±_, 2020, at San Rafael, California. 26 27 28 -1 - PROOF OF SERVICE