arrow left
arrow right
  • NACE REYNOLDS VS. ROBIN AMELIA SHEEHAN ET AL OTHER NON EXEMPT COMPLAINTS document preview
  • NACE REYNOLDS VS. ROBIN AMELIA SHEEHAN ET AL OTHER NON EXEMPT COMPLAINTS document preview
  • NACE REYNOLDS VS. ROBIN AMELIA SHEEHAN ET AL OTHER NON EXEMPT COMPLAINTS document preview
  • NACE REYNOLDS VS. ROBIN AMELIA SHEEHAN ET AL OTHER NON EXEMPT COMPLAINTS document preview
  • NACE REYNOLDS VS. ROBIN AMELIA SHEEHAN ET AL OTHER NON EXEMPT COMPLAINTS document preview
  • NACE REYNOLDS VS. ROBIN AMELIA SHEEHAN ET AL OTHER NON EXEMPT COMPLAINTS document preview
  • NACE REYNOLDS VS. ROBIN AMELIA SHEEHAN ET AL OTHER NON EXEMPT COMPLAINTS document preview
  • NACE REYNOLDS VS. ROBIN AMELIA SHEEHAN ET AL OTHER NON EXEMPT COMPLAINTS document preview
						
                                

Preview

CM-015 ATTORNEY OR PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY (Name, State Bar number, and address): FOR COURT USE ONLY - Alex A. Graft, SB# 239647 / Kendall A. Layne, SB# 99859 LEWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH LLP 333 Bush Street, Suite 1100 San Francisco, CA 94104 TELEPHONE NO.: 415-362-2580 FAX NO. (Optional): 415-434-0882 ELECTRONICALLY alex.graft@lewisbrisbois.com E-MAIL ADDRESS (Optional): F I L E D Superior Court of California, Defendants ROBIN AMELIA SHEEHAN, MATTHEW ATTORNEY FOR (Name): County of San Francisco SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 12/17/2021 STREET ADDRESS: 400 McAllister Street Clerk of the Court MAILING ADDRESS: BY: ERNALYN BURA Deputy Clerk San Francisco, CA 94102 CITY AND ZIP CODE: BRANCH NAME: CASE NUMBER: PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER: NACE REYNOLDS CGC-21-594238 (consolidated with CGC-21-594246) DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT: ROBIN AMELIA SHEEHAN, et al. JUDICIAL OFFICER: DEPT.: NOTICE OF RELATED CASE Identify, in chronological order according to date of filing, all cases related to the case referenced above. 1. a. Title: Mendez v. Sheehan b. Case number: CGC-21-594247 c. Court: ~ same as above d. □ Department: other state or federal court (name and address): e. Case type: □ limited civil unlimited civil probate □ family law □ other (specify): f. Filing date:August 2, 2021 g. Has this case been designated or determined as "complex?" □ Yes □ No h. Relationship of this case to the case referenced above (check all that apply): □ involves the same parties and is based on the same or similar claims. □ arises from the same or substantially identical transactions, incidents, or events requiring the determination of the same or substantially identical questions of law or fact. □ involves claims against, title to, possession of, or damages to the same property. □ is likely for other reasons to require substantial duplication of judicial resources if heard by different judges. □ Additional explanation is attached in attachment 1h i. Status of case: ~ pending □ dismissed □ with □ without prejudice □ disposed of by judgment 2. a. Title: Love v. Sheehan b. Case number: CGC-21-596617 c. Court: ~ same as above □ other state or federal court (name and address): d. Department: Page 1 of 3 Form Approved for Optional Use Cal. Rules of Court, rule 3.300 Judicial Council of California NOTICE OF RELATED CASE www.courtinfo.ca.gov CM-015 [Rev. July 1, 2007] 4886-6165-0439.1 American LegalNet, Inc. www.FormsWorkflow.com CM-015 PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER: NACE REYNOLDS CASE NUMBER: CGC-21-594238 (consolidated with DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT: ROBIN AMELIA SHEEHAN, et al. CGC-21-594246) 2. (continued) e. Case type: □ limited civil unlimited civil □ probate □ family law □ other (specify): f. Filing date: November 4, 2021 g. Has this case been designated or determined as "complex?" □ Yes □ No h. Relationship of this case to the case referenced above (check all that apply): □ involves the same parties and is based on the same or similar claims. □ arises from the same or substantially identical transactions, incidents, or events requiring the determination of the same or substantially identical questions of law or fact. □ involves claims against, title to, possession of, or damages to the same property. □ is likely for other reasons to require substantial duplication of judicial resources if heard by different judges. □ Additional explanation is attached in attachment 2h i. Status of case: □ pending □ dismissed □ with □ without prejudice □ disposed of by judgment 3. a. Title: b. Case number: c. Court: □ same as above other state or federal court (name and address): □ d. Department: e. Case type: □ limited civil □ unlimited civil □ probate □ family law □ other (specify): f. Filing date: g. Has this case been designated or determined as "complex?" □ Yes □ No h. Relationship of this case to the case referenced above (check all that apply): □ involves the same parties and is based on the same or similar claims. □ arises from the same or substantially identical transactions, incidents, or events requiring the determination of the same or substantially identical questions of law or fact. □ involves claims against, title to, possession of, or damages to the same property. □ is likely for other reasons to require substantial duplication of judicial resources if heard by different judges. □ Additional explanation is attached in attachment 3h i. Status of case: □ pending □ dismissed □ with □ without prejudice □ disposed of by judgment 4. □ Additional related cases are described in Attachment 4. Number of pages attached: Date: December 17, 2021 Alex A. Graft  ~ (TYPE OR PRINT NAME OF PARTY OR ATTORNEY) (SIGNATURE OF PARTY OR ATTORNEY) 4886-6165-0439.1 CM-015 [Rev. July 1, 2007] NOTICE OF RELATED CASE Page 2 of 3 American LegalNet, Inc. www.FormsWorkflow.com CALIFORNIA STATE COURT PROOF OF SERVICE Reynolds v. Heit, et al. San Francisco Superior Court Case No. CGC-21-594246 STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO At the time of service, I was over 18 years of age and not a party to this action. My business address is 333 Bush Street, Suite 1100, San Francisco, CA 94104-2872. On December 17, 2021, I served true copies of the following document(s): NOTICE OF RELATED CASES I served the document on the following persons at the following addresses (including fax numbers and e-mail addresses, if applicable): Attorneys for Plaintiff NACE REYNOLDS Attorneys for Specially Appearing Jacob Harker, Esq. Defendants BRIAN HEIT and HEIT LAW LAW OFFICES OF JACOB HARKER GROUP 268 Bush Street, Suite 3732 Jean Cha, Esq. San Francisco, CA 94104 Ed Sasaki, Esq. Phone: 415-624-7602 CHA LAW ETHICS Fax: 415-684-7757 1100 W. Town & Country Rd., Suite 1250 Email: jacob@harkercounsel.com Orange, CA 92868 Phone: 714-242-8588 Daniel L. Balsam, Esq. Fax: 657-235-8588 THE LAW OFFICES OF DANIEL Email: jean@chalawethics.com BALSAM Email: ed@chalawethics.com 2601C Blanding Avenue, #271 Alameda, CA 94501 Phone: 415-869-2873 Fax: 415-869-2873 Email: legal@danbalsam.com The document was served by the following means:  (BY ELECTRONIC SERVICE VIA FIRST LEGAL) Based on a court order, I caused the above-entitled document to be served through First Legal at https://firstlegal.com addressed to all parties appearing on the electronic service list for the above-entitled case. The service transmission was reported as complete and a copy of the First Legal Filing Receipt Page/Confirmation will be filed, deposited, or maintained with the original document in this office.  (BY ELECTRONIC SERVICE VIA FIRST LEGAL) Based on a court order, I caused the above-entitled document to be served through First Legal at https://firstlegal.com addressed to all parties appearing on the electronic service list for the above-entitled case. The service transmission was reported as complete and a copy of the First Legal Filing Receipt Page/Confirmation will be filed, deposited, or maintained with the original document in this office. I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on December 17, 2021, at San Francisco, California. Mike D. Lewis