On August 03, 2021 a
Appellate Materials
was filed
involving a dispute between
Luiz, Paul 4149 Sante Fe San Luis Obispo, Ca,
and
Luiz, Paul 4149 Sante Fe San Luis Obispo, Ca,
Yelp,
for MONEY
in the District Court of San Francisco County.
Preview
FiL
COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO Seen, SBE de
400 MCALLISTER STREET, SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94102
YELP Superior cout’ Gas
CSM-21-864629
APPELLANT(S)
Small Claim Case Number
vs.
PAUL LUIZ -
ve Court Judgment-Small Claims Appeal
RESPONDENT(S)
This cause came on regularly for trial on. sleavary 24,222 in Department _> © 4
before the Honorable. Gaanett L -Wes Judge Pro Tem Presiding.
The Appellant appearing slames Danae, Cea. d ton CHAner Teas? Qumeo i inperson the
Respondent appearing “Rave Lure ~pBA AMPAC Rerun Via Zoom
and evidence having being introduced, the cause was submitted for decision.
[ ] AFFIRMED [X]REVERSED
JUDGMENT IS ORDERED in ror of (name) Je
and against (name)__fAvL Lure DEA AM PAC Reta
in the amount of :
§ -O7 ___ principat
$_-O~ __ artorneyrees
$ -O- COSTS
$ -O- otter __ sc
__-0- TOTAL
TERMS/OTHER ORDERS
“me touas Dismisses Ampac RePaa's achon in favors} fh parkes “lune 22, 204
“Teams OF SERVICE AGREEMENT, Welter CoNTAINS A MANDATORY ARBITRATION CLAUSE.
CCP Wh. SHO (c)(1) The Court nokes—Hhat unless otherwise Suthorined by Yaw, oc
dodas has no aia Wha" SPE a cn va
Th judgment fon appeal’ is “ndtar ‘and 303) sting eas Feinneraer 7a he
Exhibits are ordered returned pursuant to CCP 1952. The case is remanded back to Small Claims
/ Court. wz Z
paTeD: .len vary UA, wZh
JUDGE PRO TEM OF THE SUPERIOR COURT
Court Judgment-Smail Claims Appeal
Form 005152
f
Document Filed Date
January 27, 2022
Case Filing Date
August 03, 2021
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Preview
FiL COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO Seen, SBE de 400 MCALLISTER STREET, SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94102 YELP Superior cout’ Gas CSM-21-864629 APPELLANT(S) Small Claim Case Number vs. PAUL LUIZ - ve Court Judgment-Small Claims Appeal RESPONDENT(S) This cause came on regularly for trial on. sleavary 24,222 in Department _> © 4 before the Honorable. Gaanett L -Wes Judge Pro Tem Presiding. The Appellant appearing slames Danae, Cea. d ton CHAner Teas? Qumeo i inperson the Respondent appearing “Rave Lure ~pBA AMPAC Rerun Via Zoom and evidence having being introduced, the cause was submitted for decision. [ ] AFFIRMED [X]REVERSED JUDGMENT IS ORDERED in ror of (name) Je and against (name)__fAvL Lure DEA AM PAC Reta in the amount of : § -O7 ___ principat $_-O~ __ artorneyrees $ -O- COSTS $ -O- otter __ sc __-0- TOTAL TERMS/OTHER ORDERS “me touas Dismisses Ampac RePaa's achon in favors} fh parkes “lune 22, 204 “Teams OF SERVICE AGREEMENT, Welter CoNTAINS A MANDATORY ARBITRATION CLAUSE. CCP Wh. SHO (c)(1) The Court nokes—Hhat unless otherwise Suthorined by Yaw, oc dodas has no aia Wha" SPE a cn va Th judgment fon appeal’ is “ndtar ‘and 303) sting eas Feinneraer 7a he Exhibits are ordered returned pursuant to CCP 1952. The case is remanded back to Small Claims / Court. wz Z paTeD: .len vary UA, wZh JUDGE PRO TEM OF THE SUPERIOR COURT Court Judgment-Smail Claims Appeal Form 005152 f