arrow left
arrow right
  • PRECILA BALABBO VS. CVS PHARMACY, INC. OTHER NON EXEMPT COMPLAINTS document preview
  • PRECILA BALABBO VS. CVS PHARMACY, INC. OTHER NON EXEMPT COMPLAINTS document preview
  • PRECILA BALABBO VS. CVS PHARMACY, INC. OTHER NON EXEMPT COMPLAINTS document preview
  • PRECILA BALABBO VS. CVS PHARMACY, INC. OTHER NON EXEMPT COMPLAINTS document preview
  • PRECILA BALABBO VS. CVS PHARMACY, INC. OTHER NON EXEMPT COMPLAINTS document preview
  • PRECILA BALABBO VS. CVS PHARMACY, INC. OTHER NON EXEMPT COMPLAINTS document preview
						
                                

Preview

CM-015 ATTORNEY OR PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY (Name, State Bar number, and address): FOR COURT USE ONLY James Robert Maxwell 143203 Rogers Joseph O'Donnell 311 California Street, 10th Floor San Francisco, CA 94104-2695 ELECTRONICALLY TELEPHONE NO.:415-956-2828 FAX NO.(Optional): 415-956-8457 F I L E D E-MAIL ADDRESS (Optional):jmaxwell@rjo.com Superior Court of California, County of San Francisco ATTORNEY FOR (Name):Defendant Almar Sales Co., Inc. SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 08/28/2020 STREET ADDRESS: 400 MC ALLISTER STREET Clerk of the Court MAILING ADDRESS: BY: EDWARD SANTOS Deputy Clerk SAN CITY AND ZIP CODE: FRANCISCO, CA 94102 BRANCH NAME: PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER: PRECILA BALABBO CASE NUMBER: CGC-20-583875 DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT:CVS PHARMACY, INC., et al. JUDICIAL OFFICER: DEPT.: NOTICE OF RELATED CASE Identify, in chronological order according to date of filing, all cases related to the case referenced above. 1. a. Title:Consumer Advocacy Group v. Party City Holdings, Inc., et al. b. Case number: CIV 1903787 c. Court: ‰ same as above ‰X other state or federal court(name and address): Marin County Superior Court d. Department: e. Case type: ‰ limited civil ‰X unlimited civil‰ probate ‰family law ‰ other (specify): f. Filing date:10/3/19 g. Has this case been designated or determined as "complex?" ‰ Yes ‰X No h. Relationship of this case to the case referenced above (check all that apply): ‰X involves the same parties and is based on the same or similar claims. ‰X arises from the same or substantially identical transactions, incidents, or events requiring the determination of the same or substantially identical questions of law or fact. ‰ involves claims against, title to, possession of, or damages to the same property. ‰ is likely for other reasons to require substantial duplication of judicial resources if heard by different judges. ‰ Additional explanation is attached in attachment 1h i. Status of case: ‰X pending ‰ dismissed ‰ with ‰ without prejudice ‰ disposed ofby judgment 2. a. Title: b. Case number: c. Court: ‰ same as above ‰ other state or federal court (name and address): d. Department: Page 1 of 3 Form Approved for Optional Use Judicial Council of California NOTICE OF RELATED CASE Cal. Rules of Court, rule 3.300 www.courtinfo.ca.gov CM-015 [Rev. July 1, 2007] CM-015 PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER:PRECILA BALABBO CASE NUMBER: CGC-20-583875 DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT:CVS PHARMACY, INC., et al. 2. (continued) e. Case type: ‰ limited civil ‰ unlimited civil ‰ probate ‰ family law ‰ other (specify): f. Filing date: g. Has this case been designated or determined as "complex?" ‰ Yes ‰ No h. Relationship of this case to the case referenced above (check all that apply): ‰involves the same parties and is based on the same or similar claims. ‰arises from the same or substantially identical transactions, incidents, or events requiring the determination of the same or substantially identical questions of law or fact. ‰involves claims against, title to, possession of, or damages to the same property. ‰is likely for other reasons to require substantial duplication of judicial resources if heard by different judges. ‰ Additional explanation is attached in attachment 2h i. Status of case: ‰pending ‰dismissed ‰ with ‰ without prejudice ‰disposed of by judgment 3. a. Title: b. Case number: c. Court: ‰ same as above ‰ other state or federal court (name and address): d. Department: e. Case type: ‰ limited civil ‰ unlimited civil ‰ probate ‰ family law ‰ other (specify): f. Filing date: g. Has this case been designated or determined as "complex?" ‰ Yes ‰ No h. Relationship of this case to the case referenced above (check all that apply): ‰ involves the same parties and is based on the same or similar claims. ‰ arises from the same or substantially identical transactions, incidents, or events requiring the determination of the same or substantially identical questions of law or fact. ‰ involves claims against, title to, possession of, or damages to the same property. ‰ is likely for other reasons to require substantial duplication of judicial resources if heard by different judges. ‰ Additional explanation is attached in attachment 3h i. Status of case: ‰ pending ‰ dismissed ‰ with ‰ without prejudice ‰ disposed of by judgment 4. ‰ Additional related cases are described in Attachment 4. Number of pages attached: Date: August 25, 2020 James R.Maxwell (TYPE OR PRINT NAME OF PARTY OR ATTORNEY) (SIGNATURE OF PARTY OR ATTORNEY) CM-015 [Rev. July 1, 2007] NOTICE OF RELATED CASE Page 2 of 3 PROOF OF SERVICE 1 lc.c.p. $$ 1010.6, 1011, ml-l013a, 2015.5, C.R.C.$$ r.21,2.260,2.30 6l 2 I, Richard Mukai, state: J My business address is 31 1 California Street, lOth Floor, San Francisco, CA 94104. I am employed in the City and County of San Francisco where this service occurs .or mailing 4 occun6d.'The envelop6 or package-was placed in the mail at San Francisco, California. I am over the age of eightebn yedrs anif not a iarty to this action. On August 28, 2020 ,I served the 5 following documents described as: 6 NOTICE OF RELATED CASE 7 on the following person(s) in this action by placing a true copy thereof enclosed in a sealed envelope, with fhb postage prepaid, addressed as follows: 8 Jordan Schatz, Esq. Attorneys for Plaintiff 9 Evan J. Smith, Esq. Ryan P. Cardona, Esq. 10 Brodsky & Smith, LLC 9595 Wilshire Blvd., Ste. 900 11 Beverly Hills, CA 90212 Telephone: s90 t2 Facsimile: 60 Email: ith.com 13 esml th.com t4 X 15 I6 l7 ordinary business practices. 18 I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the I9 foregoing is true and correct and that this declaration was executed this date at San Francisco, California. 20 Dated: August 28,2020 2l 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Page I PROOF OF SERVICE - Case No. CIV1903787 508367.1516074.1