arrow left
arrow right
  • JASON EVERETT THOMPSON et al VS. DEAN GREGORY ASIMOS CONTRACT/WARRANTY document preview
  • JASON EVERETT THOMPSON et al VS. DEAN GREGORY ASIMOS CONTRACT/WARRANTY document preview
  • JASON EVERETT THOMPSON et al VS. DEAN GREGORY ASIMOS CONTRACT/WARRANTY document preview
  • JASON EVERETT THOMPSON et al VS. DEAN GREGORY ASIMOS CONTRACT/WARRANTY document preview
						
                                

Preview

IE SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO Document Scanning Lead Sheet Oct-10-2012 12:26 pm Case Number: CGC-11-514980 Filing Date: Oct-10-2012 12:25 Filed by: RONNIE OTERO Juke Box: 001 Image: 03796600 GENERIC CIVIL FILING (NO FEE) JASON EVERETT THOMPSON et al VS. DEAN GREGORY ASIMOS 001003796600 Instructions: Please place this sheet on top of the document to be scanned.90 pope an — _ MPRA Moc (inovncy oF Paviy without altornay Fp Cot Use Onl C. TODD NORRIS, SBN 181337 nt BULLIVANT HOUSER BAILEY, PC N2OCT LO/ aN iss 601 CALIFORNIA STREET, SUITE 1800 SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94108 Telephone Nov 415-352-2700 of No. or File No. Attorner for Plaintiff 35603-t insert wame of Court, and Judicial! District and Branch Court: Superior Court Of The State Of California, County Of San Era: Plaintiff: JASON EVERETT THOMPSON, et ab Defendant: DEAN GREGORY ASIMOS dba DRAKE REALTY. PROOF OF SERVICE Hearing Dare. rime: pene Case Number: Tue, Oct. 09, 2012 9:30AM 206 CGC-11-514980 ~ Al the time of service 1 was at least 18 years of age and not a party to this action, 2. 1 served copies of the Joint Statement Re: Trial Time Limits; Plaintiff’ Motion In Limine #3: To Exclude Evidence Of Transactions And Damages That Defendant Failed To Disclose In Response To Plaintiff's Special lnterrogatory Nos. 12, 13, 24 And 25, And Plaintiff's Supplemental Interrogatory hereto; Plaintiff's Motion In Limine #1: To Exclude Evidence Of Third-Party Complaints Conceming Wired Real Estate Group. Inc.; Plaintiffs! Motion In Limine #2: To Bxclude Evidence Offered By Defendant Gregory Dean Asimos bi Support Of His Counterelaims, Or In The Altemative, To Bxclude Evidence Asimos Failed To Timely Disclose Either In Response To Discovery Requests Or In Violation OF The Court's August 23, 2012 Order. 3. a. Panty served: JFSSICA BARSOTTI b. Person served: A. HOBBS, FRONT DESK PERSON 4. Address where the party was served: 5032 WOODMINSTER LANE, OAKLAND, CA 94602 5. served the party: 4, by personal service. 1 personally delivered the documents listed in item 2 to the party or person authorized to receive process for the party on: Thu., Oct, 04, 2012 at: 4:28PM, to the person(s) indicated below in the manner as provided in 1011 cep. A. HOBBS, FRONT DESK PERSON (1) (Business) 1 informed him or her of the general nature of the papers. 7 Person Who Served Papers: Recoverable Cost Per CCP 1033.5(a)(4)(B) a. ORLANDO MARTINEZ d. The Fee for Service was: 118 Howard Street ¢. Tam: (3) registered California process server San Francisco, CA 94103 (i) Independent Contractor Telephone = (415) 626~3111 Gi) Registration No.: — 2008-0001067 Fax (418) 626-1331 Gil) Couny: San Francisco www firstlegalnetwork.com y 8, Ideclare wuter penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is fhe ane eovvect Date: Fri, Oct. 05, 2012 ae - (ORGAN MARTIN PROOF OF SERVI “bulho 7 ROOF OF SERVICE 1D butho-sf-481508 Judicial C si] Fe Rule 2.150) Rev dauvary f, 2007