arrow left
arrow right
  • Transformative Healthcare Inc vs. Tyler, Patrick Sean Fraud, Business Torts, etc. document preview
  • Transformative Healthcare Inc vs. Tyler, Patrick Sean Fraud, Business Torts, etc. document preview
  • Transformative Healthcare Inc vs. Tyler, Patrick Sean Fraud, Business Torts, etc. document preview
  • Transformative Healthcare Inc vs. Tyler, Patrick Sean Fraud, Business Torts, etc. document preview
  • Transformative Healthcare Inc vs. Tyler, Patrick Sean Fraud, Business Torts, etc. document preview
  • Transformative Healthcare Inc vs. Tyler, Patrick Sean Fraud, Business Torts, etc. document preview
						
                                

Preview

25 COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS SUFFOLK, SS. ‘ SUPERIOR COURT DEPARTMENT BUSINESS LITIGATION SESSION CIVIL ACTION NO. 2084-CV-02375- _ BLSI TRANSFORMATIVE HEALTHCARE, INC. and FALLON AMBULANCE SERVICES, LLC, Plaintiffs, PARICK SEAN TYLER and RANDSECO, LLC, ) ) ) ) ) v. ) ) ) ) Defendants. ) ) MOTION TO STRIKE MATERIALS SUBMITTED BY PLAINTIFFS IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGME! Pursuant to Rule 56(e) of the Massachusetts Rules of Civil Procedure, Defendants Patritk Sean Tyler and Randseco, LLC move this Court to strike portions of affidavits and exhibits submitted by Plaintiffs in support of their Opposition to Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment. As grounds for this Motion, Defendants state that the proposed evidence is inadmissible and should be struck. ‘ Defendants further move to strike Plaintiffs’ responses to Defendants’ facts that are beyond the scope of Superior Court Rule 9A(b)(5)(iii)(A), which limits any response to “stating whether a given fact is disputed and, if so, cit[ation] to the specific evidence.” WHEREFORE, Defendants Patrick Sean Tyler and Randseco, LLC respectfully request that this Court: A. — Allow this Motion;B. Strike exhibits 14, 16, 17, 18, 19 and 20 from the summary judgment record; Cc. Strike the portions of Plaintiffs’ affidavits that (i) constitute hearsay; (ii) are made on information and belief, (iii) contain legal or factual conclusions; and/or (iv) ' comprise speculation and/or conjecture, as identified in Exhibit A to the accompanying memorandum; D. Strike all responses to the statement of facts beyond the limitation of Rule 9A, as identified in Exhibit B to the accompanying memorandum; E. — Enter summary judgment in Defendants’ favor on all Counts in the Amended Complaint; F. Award Defendants all of the costs, expenses and attorneys’ fees they have incurred in defending the claims asserted against them in this action; and G. Award Defendants such other and further relief that justice so requires. Respectfully submitted, PATRICK SEAN TYLER and RANDSECO, LLC By their attorneys, ts Shepard Davidson Shepard Davidson (BBO #557082) sdavidson@burnslev.com Laura Lee Mittelman (BBO #689752) Imittelman@pburnslev.com Burns & Levinson LLP 125 High Street Boston, MA 02110 617-345-3000 Dated: March 15, 2022| SUPERIOR COURT RULE 9C CERTIFICATE 1, Laura Lee Mittelman, hereby certify that on March 11, 2022, I conferred with opposing counsel] by telephone in good faith to narrow the issues raised in this motion. | /s/ Laura Lee Mittelman CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I, Laura Lee Mittelman, hereby certify that on March 15, 2022 1 served a true and accurate copy of the foregoing document on the following counsel of record via email and U.S. Mail. Michael Boudett, Esq. James Fullmer, Esq. Foley Hoag LLP Seaport West 155 Seaport Boulevard Boston, MA 02210-2600 mboudett@foleyhoag.com jfullmer@foleyhoag.com ¢s/ Laura Lee Mittelman