arrow left
arrow right
  • CHRIS GREEN  vs.  ROBERT COLLINS et alPROFESSIONAL LIABILITY document preview
  • CHRIS GREEN  vs.  ROBERT COLLINS et alPROFESSIONAL LIABILITY document preview
  • CHRIS GREEN  vs.  ROBERT COLLINS et alPROFESSIONAL LIABILITY document preview
  • CHRIS GREEN  vs.  ROBERT COLLINS et alPROFESSIONAL LIABILITY document preview
  • CHRIS GREEN  vs.  ROBERT COLLINS et alPROFESSIONAL LIABILITY document preview
  • CHRIS GREEN  vs.  ROBERT COLLINS et alPROFESSIONAL LIABILITY document preview
  • CHRIS GREEN  vs.  ROBERT COLLINS et alPROFESSIONAL LIABILITY document preview
  • CHRIS GREEN  vs.  ROBERT COLLINS et alPROFESSIONAL LIABILITY document preview
						
                                

Preview

Cause No. 09-17367 - & D 10 ROY 25 Curis’GREEN, Ty THE 2347 3DistRICT CouRT Plaintiff, v. ~—-Daulag COuNTy, TEXAS Rosert J. COLLINS, : § § § § § § Defendant. PLAINTIFF’S AGREED FIRST MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE Plaintiff move the Court for a continuance of the November 29, 2010 trial date and in support would show as follows: 1. The present trial setting is only the second setting in this case. 2. Neither party appeared for the original trial setting because, in reliance on past practice, they were not expressly called to trial. Plaintiffs counsel was, however, called to trial in an older case in Rockwall on the same day. Regardless, this case was dismissed for want of prosecution and only recently reinstated. 3. Plaintiff requires additional time to conduct discovery and prepare for trial. Moreover, the parties have not mediated this dispute. 4, In addition to the foregoing, Plaintiffs’ counsel is set for trial in two other cases the week of the 29" and both of those cases are older. 5. The continuance is sought in the interest of justice and not solely for delay. 6. Defendant is in agreement with the relief sought herein. WHEREFORE, Plaintiff respectfully requests that the November 29, 2010 trial date be vacated and the case be reset in the ordinary course of the court’s business. PLAINTIFF’S AGREED FIRST MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE PaGe fState Bar #0 1801 N. Hampton, Ste. 370 Desoto, Texas 75115 (972) 291-9300 (972) 291-0636 Facsimile ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF AGREED: See Attechouf Robert J. Collins CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE On this 18" day of November 2010, a copy of the foregoing instrument was served on Defendant as set forth below: Via FACSIMILE (214) 580-7600 Robert J. Collins 1401 Elm St., Ste. 1800 Dallas, TX 75202 DEFENDANT, PRO SE PLAINTIFF'S AGREED FIRST MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE PAGE 2Nov 18 2010 9:52AM HP LASERJET FAX : Respectfully submitted, David R Gibson State Bar #07861220 1801 N, Hampton, Ste. 370 Desoto, Texas 75115 (972) 291-9300 (972) 291-0636 Facsimile ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF AGREED: Robert Jlext—"—~ Lathe Cobre Collins /-saesramss Robert J. Collins CERURICATE OF SERVICE On this ___ day of November 2010, a copy of the foregoing instrument was served on Defendant as set forth below: ¥ Ih 4) §80-7600 Robert J. Collins 140} Elm St., Ste. 1800 Dallas, TX 7$202 DEFENDANT, PRO SE David R. Gibson PLAINTIFF'S AGREED FIRST MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE Pacp2Telephone (972) 291-9300 ViA First CLASS MAIL Clerk, 134” District Court 600 Commerce Street Dallas, Texas 75202 THE GIBSON LAW GROUP ATTORNEYS ATLAW 1801 N. HampTon Rb, ‘Ste. 370 DESoTosT ‘AS S1AS ggahaas raise my.lawycr@s eglobalnet c ~ aot LERK Facsimile (972) 291-0636 ee DEPUTY November 18, 2010 Re: — Chris Green v. Robert J. Collins and Robert J. Collins, P.C. Cause No. 09-17367 Dear Clerk: Please file the enclosed Plaintiff's First Agreed Motion for Continuance, present the enclosed agreed order to the Court for consideration, and return the file-stamped copy of the motion to me in the enclosed SASE. Thank you. ce: Defendant Very truly yous, avi ibson