arrow left
arrow right
  • Meline, Edward Richard et al vs Jessee, Nelda F et al(26) Unlimited Other Real Property document preview
  • Meline, Edward Richard et al vs Jessee, Nelda F et al(26) Unlimited Other Real Property document preview
  • Meline, Edward Richard et al vs Jessee, Nelda F et al(26) Unlimited Other Real Property document preview
  • Meline, Edward Richard et al vs Jessee, Nelda F et al(26) Unlimited Other Real Property document preview
						
                                

Preview

‘ St "pR COURT 0F CALIFORNIA, COUNTY 0F B1 MEMO RE: RECUSAL OF JUDGE In case Date; #z /{ Z 27g L301 $0 9 Case name: From Judicial gaww‘ga ' Vtj I {jg/C a/J"; Ofcerzwhpf / ~ (Sign orim'tial) U Bensb E] Gilbert D Gunn U Hermansen U Howell D Kelly D-Patn'ck D Reilley U Roberts D Scott . D XStevens I am recusing myselfbecause: D I have personal knowledge of facts. the disputed (A judge deemed to have personal knowledge ifthe judge or a spouse or relative is likely to be a witness.) CCP 170. 1(a)(1). D I have served as a lawyer in this proceeding or represented or advised one of the in parties another proceeding’involving the same issues. (A judge is deemed to have served as a lawyer in the proceeding if within the past twolyears (a) a party'was a client of the or the judge judge’s rm, or (b) a laWyer in the case was in the CCP 170; practice‘with judge.) 11(a)(2). D I havepor my spouse rninor‘child a or- has, nancial interest. in the subject matter or in a party. CCP 170.1000.» ~ ~ D I or my spouse or relative is a party. CCP 170. 1(a)('4). D A lawyer in the proceeding, or an attorney in practice with one of the lawyers is my spouse, former' ' spouse, child, sibling, or parent; or' has such ' relationship with myi Spouse1CCP 170‘ 1»(a)(5). . j mevemy recusal Would irther the interests ofjustice.\CCP .170.1(a)(6)'(A)i D I belieye‘ there is a substantial doubt as to my capacity i to be CCP impartial. 17 - (a)(6)(B)- A person aware of the facts might reasonably entertain a doubt that I would be able to be impartial. CCP l70.1(a)(6)(C). ' . . . ., D I heard this case, and cannot participate in appellate review ofit. CCP 170. 1(b). ‘ v: \. Comment: U The above basis for disqualication having been disclosed, the have indicated parties they wish to WAIVE the disqualication. Counsel are to submit a written waiver reciting-the basis for disqualication and signed by all parties and their counsel. bias or (Personal prejudice . concerning a party and a judge’s involvement as an attorney or Witness CANNOT BE WAIVED:)..CCR 170.3(b), cc: Presiding Judge (or Assignment Clerk if om Presiding Judge) i A" I x ‘-. H l , i i V j y " Ki. .3 » Forms\Admin\Memo re Recusal of Judge """ H ' ' "‘ ' ' (Revised 05/02/01 one) SUPERIOR COURT 0F CALIFORNIA, COUNTY ogBUTTE . \\ ., _ x '\| \ ‘ =2 MEMO REz‘DISQUALIFICATION 0F JUDGE BY PARTY a i In ' :base flél’h ’ ' caSC‘VI#II ‘ ‘ L‘ Date: From Judicial Ofder: (Signo'r' z'izitikzl) D Benson U Gilbert D Gunn U Hermansen D Howell D Kelly D Patrick D Reilley D Roberts D Scott D Stevens D 4 D The oral/written peremptory chéllenge against me under CCP 170 6 made by I I I. on is D honored Dstrleken because ' 'U The case is Clerk. assignedto Judge Assignment 'bi'y'the U-A ~~‘ veried statement of disqualication for cause 'has been led- against me on .by D Without conceding my disqualication, I request that Judge , ‘ having been agreed uponbythe parties, sit and actin my place. , 4 . . . : U I hereby. consent to the disqualication- The case ' is assigned' to Judge " ’ by the Assignment Clerk ‘ . ~ . .- - D I ansWer thedisqualication Statement as follows D By agreement of the parties, the case is'referred to Judge for . the determination of the disqualication D :The case is referred to the Assignment Clerk, who shall notify the Judicial of the . need to a judge to determine the question of Council A ~ select disqualication. cc: Presiding Judge (or Assignment Clerk if om Presiding Judge) .I ’1‘ Forms\Admin\Memo re Disqualic'éui ddge byZPartyi (Revisad 08/02/01 oDB)