Preview
‘
QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLiVAN, LLP
H
Michael E Liik (CA Ba; No 232430) ' '
‘'
N
lsoolstreet, suite 900 I;
E
v
,
_
‘ _
'
Washington, D. C. 20005
'
SAN-FMIATIE'0
‘
DJ
Te1ephone: (202) 538—8009
2
COUNTY
'
mich'aelliik@q1‘1innemanuel.com F53 0l
:'
2022
[Additional Counsel on Signature Page]
i
Atioi’neySfor Dej’éndant 'Dfinity USA Research, LLC
ON
SUPERIOR COURT 0F THE STATE 0F
0°
-
.
CALIFORNIA
COUNTY 0F
\D
SAN MATEO
'
DANIEL OCAMPo, Individually and on
.—:
Case No. 21-cIV-o3 843
Behalf ofAll Others Similarly Situated,
’
WC
)—:
u .1.
‘
.
v
.
STIPULATION AND [PRGPGSED]
Plaintiff, ORDER REVISING SCHEDULE
r—n
I
FOR DEEENDANTS’ MOTIONS IN
-
- »
.
RESPONSE TO THE COMPLAINT
I
r—t
1
v. '
n—a
DFINITY'USA RESEARCH, LLC,DFINITY Hon. Danny Y. Chou
STIFTUNG, ANDREESSEN HOROWITZ,
v—n
-
POLYCHAIN CAPITAL, DOMINIC »
_ Dept. 22 — Ctmi. K
1—-
WILLIAMS, and JOHN DOES
'
~
’
1-20, a
I
' ' ’
Date Action Filed: July 15, 2021
>—l
'
Defendants.
'r—I.
‘ Hearing Date: April 7, 2022
N
N
Nr—I
N:
NB5
N
N N
D YL Case No. 21-CIV-03843
STIPULATION AND [PRQPQSEB] ORDER REVISING SCHEDULE FOR
DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS IN RESPONSE TO THE COMPLAINT
PlairitiffDaielvOcampo (“P1aintiff’), and Defendants Dpity
US_A Research, LLC, AH
Capital Management, L.‘L.C., and Polychain Capital LP (together with Plaintiff, the “Stipulating
Parties”), by andthrough their undersigned counsel, hereby stipulate and agree as follows and
jointly request that the court enter the below Order approving this Stipulation.
_WHEREAS, on-O‘ctober 27, 2021, Dnity USA Research, LLC filed a motion to stay all a
proceedings inthe above-captioned action pending resolution of a related case in the Northern
District of California (the “Motion to Stay”);
WHEREAS, on November 5, 202-1, the Court entered an order setting a brieng schedule
for defendants in the above-captioned action (“Defendants”) to le their responses to the
V
I
complaint1n the event the Motion to Stayis denied;
WHEREAS, on January 27, 2022, the Court held a hearing and issued Case Management
order #2 which continued the Court’ s decision on the Motion to until February 18, 2022,
i
Stay
WHEREAS, Case Management Order #2 also ordered the Parties to submit a stipulation
and proposed order reecting (1) a revised brieng schedule for Defendants’responses to the
complaint and Defendants’ anticipated motion regarding a stay of discovery pursuant to the
Private Securities Litigation Reform Act (“Motion Regarding a Discovery Stay”) in the event the
Motion to Stay is'denied; and (2) the Parties’ positions on email service om the Court and an
email service list. _
_
h I
_
IT IS ACCORDINGLY STIPULATED, by and between the undersigned counsel for the
Stipulating Parties, that: -
i i
1. Defendants’ obligations to le any demurrers‘and/or motions in response to the
complaint, including any motions to Squash. service, continue to'be stayed pending resolution of the
i
\
Motion to .Stay. -
_
2. In the eventthe Court'denies the Motion to Stay, the deadline for Defendants to
answer or le any demurrers and/or motions in response to the complaint" and for Defendants to
le any Motion Regarding a Discovery Stay shall be February 25, 2022; the deadline for Plaintiff
to oppose Defendants’ demurrers and/or motions in response to the complaint and Motion
Regarding a‘Discovery Stay shall be March 11, 2022; and the deadline for Defendants to reply in
-2- D‘l L Case No. 2 1 -CIV-03 843
STIPULATION AND [-BRQPGS'EBTORDER REVISING SCHEDULE FOR
-
DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS IN RESPONSE TO THE COMPLAINT
H
support of their‘demurrers and/or motidns‘ in response to the complaint and Motion Regarding a
Discovery Stay shall be March 24, 2022.
3. The Stipulating Parties agree to email service. A service list1s attached hereto.
so STIPULATED. _
'
DATED: February 1, 2022- .
_
SCOTT+SCOTT ATTORNEYS AT LAW LLP
/s/John T. Jasnoch
John T. Jasnoch (CA 281605)
600W. Broadway; Suite 3300
'
San Diego, CA 92 1 01
Telephone:.619-233-4565
Facsimile: 619-233-0508
O
jjasnoch@scott-scott.com
H
Sean T. Masson V
N
230 Park Avenue, 17th Floor
New York, NY 10169
U)
Telephone: 21-2 223- 6444
Facsimile; 212-223- 6334
smasson@scott-scott. com
UI
I
Counselfor PlaintiffDaniel Ocampo
Q
O
HON
00
\O
N-.
N
LII
N
N
N
N
g
-3_ D“ Case No. 21-crv03843
STIPULATION AND European-D] ORDER REVISiNG _SCHEDULE FOR
DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS 1N RESPONSE TO THE COMPLAINT
DATED; February 1, 2022 ‘ QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART &
SULLIVAN, LLP
/s/ Michael E; Liik
Michael E. Liik (CA Bar No. 232430)
Sarah Heaton Concannon (admitted 'pro hac vice)
1300 I Street, Suite 900
Washington, D.C. 20005 .
Telephone: (202) '538-8000
michaelliik@quinnemanuel.com
sarahconcannqn@quinnemanuel.com
Emily c. Kapur (CA Bar No. 306724)
555 Twin Dolphin Dr., 5th F1.
Redwdod Shores, CA 94065
)—I
Telephone: (650) 801-5000
p—t
err1i1ykapur@quinnemanuel.com
r—l
Brenna Nelinson (admitted pro hac vice)
51 Madison Avenue, 22nd Floor-
p—A
New York, NY‘ 10010
849—7000
)—
Telephone: (212)
brennanelinson@quinne‘manuel.com
H
Counselfor Defendant Dmjtj/ USA Research, LLC
I—I
r—I
Dat_e: February-l, 2022 CRAVATH, SWAINE & _MOORE LLP
/S/Kevin J. Orsini
Kevin J. Orsini (admitted pro hac vice)
N
'
Antony L. Ryan (admittedpro hac vice) _
Lauren M. Rosenberg (admitted pro hac vice)
N
825 Eighth Avenue
New York, NY 10019
N
Telephone: (212) 474-1000
N
1
Facsimile: (212) 474-3700
aryan@cravath.com
N
korsini@cravath.com
N
1rosenberg@cravath.com
LLC
N
Counselfor Defendant Dnity USA Research, ~
N
N
DY L
'
-4- A
Case No. 21-CIV-03843
STI‘PULATION AND [.BRQRQSED] ORDER REVISING SCHEDULE FOR
DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS IN RESPONSE TO THE COMPLAINT
’
‘ DATED: February
\ooogcxmA:Lp‘N 1, 2022 LATHAM & WATKINS, LLP
/s/Maithew RaWlinson
Matthew RaWlinson (CA Bar No. 23 1890)
140 Scott Drive
Menlo Park, CA 94025
Telephone: (650) 463-3076
A
Facsimile: (650) 463-2600
matt.rawlinson@lw.com
Susan E. Engel (admitted pro hac vice)
555 Eleventh Street, NW, Suite 1000
Washington, D.C. 20004-1304 _
Telephone: (202) 637-2200
FacSimile: (202) 637-2201 I
‘
susan.engel@lw.com
Benjamin A. Naalis (admitted pro hac vice)
Gregory Mortenson (admitted pro hac vice)
1271 Avenue of the Americas
New York, NY 10020
Telephone: (212) 906-1200
Facsimile: (212) 751-4864
benjamin.naalis@lw.com
gregory.mortenson@1w.com ,
Counselfor Defendant AH Capital Management, L.L. C.
-5- DY C Case No. 2 l -CIV-03 843
STIPULATION AND W] ORDER REVISING SCHEDULE FOR
DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS IN RESPONSE TO THE COMPLAINT
I
DATED: February '1 ,- 2022'
'—'}
KEESAL, YOUNG & LOGAN
'
/s/ Peter R; Boutin
_
1
Peter R. Boutin (CA Bar No. 65261)
Christopher A. Stecher (CA Bar No. 215329)
450 Pacic Avenue
San Francisco, CA 94133 ,
Telephone: (415) 398-6000 V
r
*
_peter.boutin@ky1.com t
christopher.stecher@ky1.com
Cqunselfor Defendant Polychain Capital LP
DATED: February 1, 2022 CLEARY COTTLIEB STEEN & HAMILTON LLP
C
-
ND—l
/s/ Roger A. Cooper
Roger A. Cooper (admitted pro hac vice)
U)
Jared Gerber (admitted pro hac vice)
One Liberty Plaza
New York, NY 10006
Telephone. (212) 225-2283
KI]
racooper@cgsh. com
O\
jgerber@cgsh. com
Q
OfCounselfor DefendantiPoljichain Capital LP
H
N0°
O‘\O
U)
N
$ .
N
N
N.N
-6- DY L -
Case No. 21-CIV-03 843
STIPULATION AND [W ORDER REVISING SCHEDULE FOR
DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS IN RESPONSE TO THE COMPLAINT
H “SERVICE LIST
Daniel Obampo'v. Dnity USA ResearckLLC, et al.,Ca_se N0. 21-CIV-03843
‘
Party
'
Counsei
Plaintiff, Daniel Ocampo, Individually and John T.
'
Jasnoéh.
on Behalf ofAll Others Similarly Situated jjasnoch@scjott—scott.Com
Sean T. Masson v
smasson@scott-scott.com
Defendant, Dnity
'
USA Research, LLC '
Michael E. Liik
'
5
Inichaelliik@quinnemanuel. com .
Sarah Heaton Concannon -
sarahconcannon@quinnemanuel.com
O
Emily C. Kapur
H
emilykapur@quinnemanuel.eom
N
Brenna Nelinson ‘
DJ
brennanelinson@quinnemanuel.com -
Keyin J. Orsini
korsini@cravath.com
(ll
‘Antony L. Ryan
O\
aryan@cravath.com
\l
Lauren M. Rosenberg
00
-1rosenberg@craVath.com
19
Defendant, AH Management,
'
Matthew Rawlinson
20 L. L. C. ,
Capital ‘ matthew.rawlinson@lw.com
‘
‘21 Susan Engel
22 susan.engel@l’w.eom
23 Gregory Mortenson
gregory. mortenson@lw. com
24
Benj amin Naitalis
25
benjamin.naalis@lw.com
26 i
John EaStly
27 john.eastly@lw.com
28
'
-7- Dy L Case No. 21-CIV-03843
STIPULATION AND [-PRGPOSEB] ORDER REVISING SCHEDULE FOR
DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS IN RESPONSE TO THE COMPLAINT
)—A"
Defendant, Polychain'
' ‘
Capital LP Peter R.' Boutin .1
7. peter.boutin@ky1.com
WIN
Chriétdpher A. Steéher'
_
christopher.stcher@kyl.com
A
Roger A. Cooper.
Ox
racooper@cgsh.com
Jared Gerbef
\o"o
Preview
‘ QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLiVAN, LLP H Michael E Liik (CA Ba; No 232430) ' ' ‘' N lsoolstreet, suite 900 I; E v , _ ‘ _ ' Washington, D. C. 20005 ' SAN-FMIATIE'0 ‘ DJ Te1ephone: (202) 538—8009 2 COUNTY ' mich'aelliik@q1‘1innemanuel.com F53 0l :' 2022 [Additional Counsel on Signature Page] i Atioi’neySfor Dej’éndant 'Dfinity USA Research, LLC ON SUPERIOR COURT 0F THE STATE 0F 0° - . CALIFORNIA COUNTY 0F \D SAN MATEO ' DANIEL OCAMPo, Individually and on .—: Case No. 21-cIV-o3 843 Behalf ofAll Others Similarly Situated, ’ WC )—: u .1. ‘ . v . STIPULATION AND [PRGPGSED] Plaintiff, ORDER REVISING SCHEDULE r—n I FOR DEEENDANTS’ MOTIONS IN - - » . RESPONSE TO THE COMPLAINT I r—t 1 v. ' n—a DFINITY'USA RESEARCH, LLC,DFINITY Hon. Danny Y. Chou STIFTUNG, ANDREESSEN HOROWITZ, v—n - POLYCHAIN CAPITAL, DOMINIC » _ Dept. 22 — Ctmi. K 1—- WILLIAMS, and JOHN DOES ' ~ ’ 1-20, a I ' ' ’ Date Action Filed: July 15, 2021 >—l ' Defendants. 'r—I. ‘ Hearing Date: April 7, 2022 N N Nr—I N: NB5 N N N D YL Case No. 21-CIV-03843 STIPULATION AND [PRQPQSEB] ORDER REVISING SCHEDULE FOR DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS IN RESPONSE TO THE COMPLAINT PlairitiffDaielvOcampo (“P1aintiff’), and Defendants Dpity US_A Research, LLC, AH Capital Management, L.‘L.C., and Polychain Capital LP (together with Plaintiff, the “Stipulating Parties”), by andthrough their undersigned counsel, hereby stipulate and agree as follows and jointly request that the court enter the below Order approving this Stipulation. _WHEREAS, on-O‘ctober 27, 2021, Dnity USA Research, LLC filed a motion to stay all a proceedings inthe above-captioned action pending resolution of a related case in the Northern District of California (the “Motion to Stay”); WHEREAS, on November 5, 202-1, the Court entered an order setting a brieng schedule for defendants in the above-captioned action (“Defendants”) to le their responses to the V I complaint1n the event the Motion to Stayis denied; WHEREAS, on January 27, 2022, the Court held a hearing and issued Case Management order #2 which continued the Court’ s decision on the Motion to until February 18, 2022, i Stay WHEREAS, Case Management Order #2 also ordered the Parties to submit a stipulation and proposed order reecting (1) a revised brieng schedule for Defendants’responses to the complaint and Defendants’ anticipated motion regarding a stay of discovery pursuant to the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act (“Motion Regarding a Discovery Stay”) in the event the Motion to Stay is'denied; and (2) the Parties’ positions on email service om the Court and an email service list. _ _ h I _ IT IS ACCORDINGLY STIPULATED, by and between the undersigned counsel for the Stipulating Parties, that: - i i 1. Defendants’ obligations to le any demurrers‘and/or motions in response to the complaint, including any motions to Squash. service, continue to'be stayed pending resolution of the i \ Motion to .Stay. - _ 2. In the eventthe Court'denies the Motion to Stay, the deadline for Defendants to answer or le any demurrers and/or motions in response to the complaint" and for Defendants to le any Motion Regarding a Discovery Stay shall be February 25, 2022; the deadline for Plaintiff to oppose Defendants’ demurrers and/or motions in response to the complaint and Motion Regarding a‘Discovery Stay shall be March 11, 2022; and the deadline for Defendants to reply in -2- D‘l L Case No. 2 1 -CIV-03 843 STIPULATION AND [-BRQPGS'EBTORDER REVISING SCHEDULE FOR - DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS IN RESPONSE TO THE COMPLAINT H support of their‘demurrers and/or motidns‘ in response to the complaint and Motion Regarding a Discovery Stay shall be March 24, 2022. 3. The Stipulating Parties agree to email service. A service list1s attached hereto. so STIPULATED. _ ' DATED: February 1, 2022- . _ SCOTT+SCOTT ATTORNEYS AT LAW LLP /s/John T. Jasnoch John T. Jasnoch (CA 281605) 600W. Broadway; Suite 3300 ' San Diego, CA 92 1 01 Telephone:.619-233-4565 Facsimile: 619-233-0508 O jjasnoch@scott-scott.com H Sean T. Masson V N 230 Park Avenue, 17th Floor New York, NY 10169 U) Telephone: 21-2 223- 6444 Facsimile; 212-223- 6334 smasson@scott-scott. com UI I Counselfor PlaintiffDaniel Ocampo Q O HON 00 \O N-. N LII N N N N g -3_ D“ Case No. 21-crv03843 STIPULATION AND European-D] ORDER REVISiNG _SCHEDULE FOR DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS 1N RESPONSE TO THE COMPLAINT DATED; February 1, 2022 ‘ QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP /s/ Michael E; Liik Michael E. Liik (CA Bar No. 232430) Sarah Heaton Concannon (admitted 'pro hac vice) 1300 I Street, Suite 900 Washington, D.C. 20005 . Telephone: (202) '538-8000 michaelliik@quinnemanuel.com sarahconcannqn@quinnemanuel.com Emily c. Kapur (CA Bar No. 306724) 555 Twin Dolphin Dr., 5th F1. Redwdod Shores, CA 94065 )—I Telephone: (650) 801-5000 p—t err1i1ykapur@quinnemanuel.com r—l Brenna Nelinson (admitted pro hac vice) 51 Madison Avenue, 22nd Floor- p—A New York, NY‘ 10010 849—7000 )— Telephone: (212) brennanelinson@quinne‘manuel.com H Counselfor Defendant Dmjtj/ USA Research, LLC I—I r—I Dat_e: February-l, 2022 CRAVATH, SWAINE & _MOORE LLP /S/Kevin J. Orsini Kevin J. Orsini (admitted pro hac vice) N ' Antony L. Ryan (admittedpro hac vice) _ Lauren M. Rosenberg (admitted pro hac vice) N 825 Eighth Avenue New York, NY 10019 N Telephone: (212) 474-1000 N 1 Facsimile: (212) 474-3700 aryan@cravath.com N korsini@cravath.com N 1rosenberg@cravath.com LLC N Counselfor Defendant Dnity USA Research, ~ N N DY L ' -4- A Case No. 21-CIV-03843 STI‘PULATION AND [.BRQRQSED] ORDER REVISING SCHEDULE FOR DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS IN RESPONSE TO THE COMPLAINT ’ ‘ DATED: February \ooogcxmA:Lp‘N 1, 2022 LATHAM & WATKINS, LLP /s/Maithew RaWlinson Matthew RaWlinson (CA Bar No. 23 1890) 140 Scott Drive Menlo Park, CA 94025 Telephone: (650) 463-3076 A Facsimile: (650) 463-2600 matt.rawlinson@lw.com Susan E. Engel (admitted pro hac vice) 555 Eleventh Street, NW, Suite 1000 Washington, D.C. 20004-1304 _ Telephone: (202) 637-2200 FacSimile: (202) 637-2201 I ‘ susan.engel@lw.com Benjamin A. Naalis (admitted pro hac vice) Gregory Mortenson (admitted pro hac vice) 1271 Avenue of the Americas New York, NY 10020 Telephone: (212) 906-1200 Facsimile: (212) 751-4864 benjamin.naalis@lw.com gregory.mortenson@1w.com , Counselfor Defendant AH Capital Management, L.L. C. -5- DY C Case No. 2 l -CIV-03 843 STIPULATION AND W] ORDER REVISING SCHEDULE FOR DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS IN RESPONSE TO THE COMPLAINT I DATED: February '1 ,- 2022' '—'} KEESAL, YOUNG & LOGAN ' /s/ Peter R; Boutin _ 1 Peter R. Boutin (CA Bar No. 65261) Christopher A. Stecher (CA Bar No. 215329) 450 Pacic Avenue San Francisco, CA 94133 , Telephone: (415) 398-6000 V r * _peter.boutin@ky1.com t christopher.stecher@ky1.com Cqunselfor Defendant Polychain Capital LP DATED: February 1, 2022 CLEARY COTTLIEB STEEN & HAMILTON LLP C - ND—l /s/ Roger A. Cooper Roger A. Cooper (admitted pro hac vice) U) Jared Gerber (admitted pro hac vice) One Liberty Plaza New York, NY 10006 Telephone. (212) 225-2283 KI] racooper@cgsh. com O\ jgerber@cgsh. com Q OfCounselfor DefendantiPoljichain Capital LP H N0° O‘\O U) N $ . N N N.N -6- DY L - Case No. 21-CIV-03 843 STIPULATION AND [W ORDER REVISING SCHEDULE FOR DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS IN RESPONSE TO THE COMPLAINT H “SERVICE LIST Daniel Obampo'v. Dnity USA ResearckLLC, et al.,Ca_se N0. 21-CIV-03843 ‘ Party ' Counsei Plaintiff, Daniel Ocampo, Individually and John T. ' Jasnoéh. on Behalf ofAll Others Similarly Situated jjasnoch@scjott—scott.Com Sean T. Masson v smasson@scott-scott.com Defendant, Dnity ' USA Research, LLC ' Michael E. Liik ' 5 Inichaelliik@quinnemanuel. com . Sarah Heaton Concannon - sarahconcannon@quinnemanuel.com O Emily C. Kapur H emilykapur@quinnemanuel.eom N Brenna Nelinson ‘ DJ brennanelinson@quinnemanuel.com - Keyin J. Orsini korsini@cravath.com (ll ‘Antony L. Ryan O\ aryan@cravath.com \l Lauren M. Rosenberg 00 -1rosenberg@craVath.com 19 Defendant, AH Management, ' Matthew Rawlinson 20 L. L. C. , Capital ‘ matthew.rawlinson@lw.com ‘ ‘21 Susan Engel 22 susan.engel@l’w.eom 23 Gregory Mortenson gregory. mortenson@lw. com 24 Benj amin Naitalis 25 benjamin.naalis@lw.com 26 i John EaStly 27 john.eastly@lw.com 28 ' -7- Dy L Case No. 21-CIV-03843 STIPULATION AND [-PRGPOSEB] ORDER REVISING SCHEDULE FOR DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS IN RESPONSE TO THE COMPLAINT )—A" Defendant, Polychain' ' ‘ Capital LP Peter R.' Boutin .1 7. peter.boutin@ky1.com WIN Chriétdpher A. Steéher' _ christopher.stcher@kyl.com A Roger A. Cooper. Ox racooper@cgsh.com Jared Gerbef \o"o