arrow left
arrow right
  • VERONICA ZELAYA-SALMERON, HERMELINDA VEGA-LOPEZ VS. GARCIA JACINTOInjury or Damage - Motor Vehicle (OCA) document preview
  • VERONICA ZELAYA-SALMERON, HERMELINDA VEGA-LOPEZ VS. GARCIA JACINTOInjury or Damage - Motor Vehicle (OCA) document preview
  • VERONICA ZELAYA-SALMERON, HERMELINDA VEGA-LOPEZ VS. GARCIA JACINTOInjury or Damage - Motor Vehicle (OCA) document preview
  • VERONICA ZELAYA-SALMERON, HERMELINDA VEGA-LOPEZ VS. GARCIA JACINTOInjury or Damage - Motor Vehicle (OCA) document preview
  • VERONICA ZELAYA-SALMERON, HERMELINDA VEGA-LOPEZ VS. GARCIA JACINTOInjury or Damage - Motor Vehicle (OCA) document preview
  • VERONICA ZELAYA-SALMERON, HERMELINDA VEGA-LOPEZ VS. GARCIA JACINTOInjury or Damage - Motor Vehicle (OCA) document preview
  • VERONICA ZELAYA-SALMERON, HERMELINDA VEGA-LOPEZ VS. GARCIA JACINTOInjury or Damage - Motor Vehicle (OCA) document preview
  • VERONICA ZELAYA-SALMERON, HERMELINDA VEGA-LOPEZ VS. GARCIA JACINTOInjury or Damage - Motor Vehicle (OCA) document preview
						
                                

Preview

Electronically Filed 1/3/2019 3:26 PM Hidalgo County District Clerks Reviewed By: Jonathan Coronado CAUSE NO. C-3748-18-A VERONICA ZELAYA-SALMERON AND § IN THE DISTRICT COURT HERMELINDA VEGA-LOPEZ, § PLAINTIFFS, § § V. § 92ND JUDICIAL DISTRICT § GARCIA JACINTO, JR. AND JORGE OMAR § GONZALEZ, § DEFENDANTS. § HIDALGO COUNTY, TEXAS PLAINTIFFS’ FIRST AMENDED PETITION TO THE HONORABLE JUDGE OF SAID COURT: NOW COME VERONICA ZELAYA-SALMERON and HERMELINDA VEGA- LOPEZ, Plaintiffs, complaining of and against GARCIA JACINTO, JR. and JORGE OMAR GONZALEZ Defendants, and for cause of action would respectfully show the Court the following: I. DISCOVERY CONTROL PLAN LEVEL 1.01 Pursuant to Texas Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 190.4, Plaintiff requests that discovery be conducted in accordance with Discovery Control Plan-Level 3. 1.02 Plaintiffs seek monetary relief greater than $200,000 but not greater than $1,000,000. II. JURISDICTION AND VENUE 2.01 This Court has jurisdiction and venue over the parties and subject matter of these claims because the amount in controversy is within the jurisdictional limits of this Court and Defendant JORGE OMAR GONZALEZ resided in Hidalgo County at the time that this cause of action accrued. III. PARTIES AND SERVICE 3.01 Plaintiffs are individuals residing in Dallas County, Texas. 3.02 Defendant, GARCIA JACINTO, JR., is an individual who may be served at 31172 Denise Avenue, Los Fresnos, Texas 78566. PLAINTIFF’S FIRST AMENDED PETITION PAGE 1 Electronically Filed 1/3/2019 3:26 PM Hidalgo County District Clerks Reviewed By: Jonathan Coronado 3.03 Defendant, JORGE OMAR GONZALEZ is an individual who may be served at 914 Bass Boulevard, Edinburg, Texas 78539. IV. FACTS 4.01 This lawsuit arises out of a motor vehicle collision that occurred on or about August 22, 2018, in Kingman, Arizona. Plaintiffs were traveling east on Minerva Lane just north of US Interstate 40, when Defendant GARCIA JACINTO, JR., while operating a vehicle entrusted to him by Defendant JORGE OMAR GONZALEZ, failed to yield the right of way, failed to maintain a single lane of traffic and collided with Plaintiffs. The collision caused the injuries and other damages complained of herein. V. CAUSES OF ACTION NEGLIGENCE – DEFENDANT GARCIA JACINTO, JR. 5.01 The collision and the injuries of the Plaintiffs were proximately caused by Defendant GARCIA JACINTO, JR.’s negligent, careless, and reckless disregard of his duty to Plaintiff, including the following acts and omissions: a. Defendant, GARCIA JACINTO, JR., failed to keep a proper lookout for the Plaintiff's safety that would have been maintained by a person of ordinary prudence under the same or similar circumstances; b. Defendant, GARCIA JACINTO, JR., failed to timely apply the brakes to his motor vehicle in order to avoid the collision; c. Defendant, GARCIA JACINTO, JR., failed to take proper evasive action that would have been taken by a person of ordinary prudence under the same or similar circumstances; d. Defendant, GARCIA JACINTO, JR., failed to remain reasonably attentive to the traffic and other conditions existing on the roadway as a reasonably prudent person would have been under the same or similar circumstances; e. Defendant, GARCIA JACINTO, JR., failed to pay requisite attention as a reasonably prudent driver would; and f. Defendant, GARCIA JACINTO, JR., was negligent per se as Defendant operated his vehicle violating the Texas Transportation Code. NEGLIGENT ENTRUSTMENT – DEFENDANT JORGE OMAR GONZALEZ 5.02 At all times relevant to this cause of action, Defendant JORGE OMAR GONZALEZ owned the vehicle with which he negligently entrusted Defendant GARCIA JACINTO, JR. and in which Defendant GARCIA JACINTO, JR. collided with the vehicle driven by Plaintiff VERONICA ZELAYA-SALMERON. PLAINTIFF’S FIRST AMENDED PETITION PAGE 2 Electronically Filed 1/3/2019 3:26 PM Hidalgo County District Clerks Reviewed By: Jonathan Coronado a. Defendant GARCIA JACINTO, JR. was an incompetent and/or reckless driver at the time of the collision. b. Defendant JORGE OMAR GONZALEZ knew or should have known that Defendant GARCIA JACINTO, JR. was an incompetent and/or reckless driver at the time of the collision. c. Defendant GARCIA JACINTO, JR. was negligent in his operation of the vehicle at the time of the collision. d. Defendant GARCIA JACINTO, JR.’s negligence proximately caused Plaintiffs’ injuries and damages. VI. DAMAGES 6.01 As a direct and proximate result of the occurrence made the basis of this lawsuit, Plaintiffs were caused to suffer severe bodily injuries and damages as set forth below. a. Reasonable expenses for necessary medical care in the past and future for Plaintiff; b. Lost wages and/or lost earning capacity, past and future; c. Pain and suffering in the past and future; d. Physical impairment in the past and future; e. Disfigurement, past and future; f. Loss of use; and g. Property damage. WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, Plaintiffs respectfully pray that the Defendants be cited to appear and answer herein, and that upon final hearing of the cause, judgment be entered for the Plaintiffs against the Defendants for damages in an amount within the jurisdictional limits of the Court, together with pre-judgment and post-judgment interest at the maximum rate allowed by law, costs of court, and such other and further relief to which the Plaintiffs may show themselves justly entitled. Respectfully submitted, RAD LAW FIRM BY: /s/Mackenzie Linyard MACKENZIE B. LINYARD State Bar No. 24083399 8001 LBJ Fwy, Suite 300 Dallas, Texas 75251 PLAINTIFF’S FIRST AMENDED PETITION PAGE 3 Electronically Filed 1/3/2019 3:26 PM Hidalgo County District Clerks Reviewed By: Jonathan Coronado Phone (972) 661-1111 Fax (972) 661-3537 E-Mail: mlinyard@radlawfirm.com E-File: efileML@radlawfirm.com ATTORNEY FOR PLAINTIFFS CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE The undersigned certifies that on this 3rd day of January, 2019 a copy of the foregoing documents and attachments were delivered to all counsel of record pursuant to the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure. _/s/ Mackenzie Linyard _____ MACKENZIE LINYARD PLAINTIFF’S FIRST AMENDED PETITION PAGE 4