arrow left
arrow right
  • WASSAR LOGISTICS HOLDINGS LLC vs. KROESCHE, MARTIN Debt/Contract - Debt/Contract document preview
						
                                

Preview

AUSE ASSAR OGISTICS ISTRICT Plaintiff, versus ROESCHE Defendant/Third-Party Plaintiff, § § HARRIS OUNTY versus § ETER HAPER OURTLAND ASSEY CHONEFELD ENESIS ARK NTERPRISES AND RISHAM LLC, Third-Party Defendants. § 333 UDICIAL ISTRICT ISMISSING ARTY LAINTIFF ROESCHE LAIMS After considering Third-Party Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss under Texas Rule of Civil Procedure 91a, any response by Third-Party Plaintiff Martin Kroesche, any reply, the pleadings on file, and the arguments of counsel, the Court: Grants Third-Party Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss and hereby dismisses Third-Party Plaintiff Martin Kroesche’s claims for fraud by non-disclosure, equitable accounting, derivative action, shareholder oppression, quantum meruit, and declaratory judgment with It is so ordered. Signed on the ____ day of ___________, 2016. OSEPH ALBACH