On August 15, 2016 a
Motion-Secondary
was filed
involving a dispute between
Kroesche, Martin,
Wassar Logistics Holdings Llc,
Schonefeld, Steve,
and
Dempsey, George,
Genesis Park,
Grisham Capital Llc,
Jrbs Engterprises,
Kroesche, Martin,
Loefffler, Court,
Massey, Glenn,
Shaper, Peter,
Wassar Logistics Holdings,
Wassar Logistics Inc,
for Debt/Contract - Debt/Contract
in the District Court of Harris County.
Preview
CAUSE NO. 2016-54111
WASSAR LOGISTICS § IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF
HOLDINGS, LLC §
§
Plaintiff, §
§
v. §
§
MARTIN KROESCHE §
§
Defendant/ §
Third-Party Plaintiff, §
§
v. § HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS
§
PETER SHAPER, COURTLAND §
LOEFLER, GLENN MASSEY, §
STEVE SCHONEFELD, GEORGE §
DEMPSEY, GENESIS PARK, §
JRBS ENTERPRISES, LTD., and §
GRISHAM CAPITAL, LLC §
§
Third-Party Defendants. § 333rd JUDICIAL DISTRICT
ORDER
On this day, the Court considered Martin Kroesche’s Motion to Quash and for
Protective Order. After reviewing the pleadings and hearing the arguments of counsel,
this Court is of the opinion that the motions should be DENIED.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the motion
to quash and for protection is DENIED. Martin Kroesche shall present for his deposition
during April 2017 in Harris County, Texas during the business week.
Signed this________day of _________________, 2017.
________________________________
HON. DARYL L. MOORE
JUDGE PRESIDING
Document Filed Date
March 31, 2017
Case Filing Date
August 15, 2016
Category
Debt/Contract - Debt/Contract
Status
Case On Appeal - Civil
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Preview
CAUSE NO. 2016-54111 WASSAR LOGISTICS § IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF HOLDINGS, LLC § § Plaintiff, § § v. § § MARTIN KROESCHE § § Defendant/ § Third-Party Plaintiff, § § v. § HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS § PETER SHAPER, COURTLAND § LOEFLER, GLENN MASSEY, § STEVE SCHONEFELD, GEORGE § DEMPSEY, GENESIS PARK, § JRBS ENTERPRISES, LTD., and § GRISHAM CAPITAL, LLC § § Third-Party Defendants. § 333rd JUDICIAL DISTRICT ORDER On this day, the Court considered Martin Kroesche’s Motion to Quash and for Protective Order. After reviewing the pleadings and hearing the arguments of counsel, this Court is of the opinion that the motions should be DENIED. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the motion to quash and for protection is DENIED. Martin Kroesche shall present for his deposition during April 2017 in Harris County, Texas during the business week. Signed this________day of _________________, 2017. ________________________________ HON. DARYL L. MOORE JUDGE PRESIDING