arrow left
arrow right
  • Henry Nutt vs. ASFC, LLC23 Unlimited - Other PI/PD/WD document preview
  • Henry Nutt vs. ASFC, LLC23 Unlimited - Other PI/PD/WD document preview
  • Henry Nutt vs. ASFC, LLC23 Unlimited - Other PI/PD/WD document preview
  • Henry Nutt vs. ASFC, LLC23 Unlimited - Other PI/PD/WD document preview
						
                                

Preview

SUPERIOR COURT or CALIFORNIA oCOUNTY 0F FRESNO FOR TU O Y Civil 1130 Division o Street ' E Fresno, California 93721-2220 ‘ _ NOV 3 2021 INTIFF / PETITIONER: Hem" N H SUP R E&Ruawmagewomm DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT: ASFC, llC DEPUTY CASE NUMBER: ORDER ON REQUEST FOR PRETRIAL DISCOVERY CONFERENCE 21CECG00531 ORDER The Request for Pretrial Discovery Conference is: E Denied. Reoson(s) for The Denial: D Insufficient meet and confer efforts prior 10 filingThe Request for Pre’rriolDiscovery Conference. D Failure ’ro make request on the Mandatory local form. D Failure ’ro provide a sufficient summary of The dispUTe. D Failure to provide a proper privilege log. D Failure To serve The opposing pcn‘y with o copy of The Request for Pre1riol Discovery Conference. D Other: K4 The Court finds That The current dispute will n01 benefit from o Pretrial Discovery Conference. E Plainfims) D Defendonns) El Cross—comploincnus) D Cross-defendonus) D omens) moyfile a discovery mofion limited to The dispute The se’r ou’r in Request for Pretrial Discovery Conference. D Granted. The PretrialDiscovery Conference isset for of om. in Deporfmenf D Pon‘ies are ordered To bring alldiscovery requests 0nd responses 0nd evidence of oll mee’r 0nd confer offempts. D Other: The time for filingo mo’rion ’ro compel discovery on The dispUTed issues is Tolled between the dofe of The filing of the request and The date of The Court's order thereon. CCP§201 6.080(c) (2). The Court calculates this To be 15 days. CCP §§1013 0nd 1013a (4)apply. Refusal of any counsel to participofe in c: Pretrial Discovery Conference shall be grounds, in The discretion of the Court for enfry of an order adverse To The porTy represenfed by counsel so refusing, or adverse to counsel. A1 The conclusion of the Pretrial Discovery Conference, porfies will be asked 10 stipulate Th0? the Court moy issue cm order adjudicating The merits of the discovery dispute, which is the subject of the Request for Pre’rriol Discovery Conference. See attached stipulation. Date: 11/3/2021 /4/(&Mflf C/ Judge onhe Superior Court gcp¥i22N§cfizzo ORDER 0N REQUEST FOR PRETRIAL DISCOVERY CONFERENCE Local Rule 2.1.17 SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA - COUNTY 0F FRESNO FOR COURTUSE ONLY CivilDepartment, Central Division \ 1130 “O“ Street Fresno, California 93724-0002 (559) 457-2000 TITLE0F CASE: Henry Nutt vs. ASFC, LLC CLERK'S CERTIFICATE 0F MAILING CfiEE‘éEfiE'Eg1 Icertify thatlam not a party to this cause and that a true copy of the: Order on Request for PretrialDiscovery Conference 'dated 11/03/21 was placed ina sealed envelope and placed for collection and mailing on the date and at the place shown below following our ordinary business practice. | am readily familiar with this court’s practice for collecting and processing correspondence for mailing. On the same day that correspondence is placed for collection and mailing, it is deposited in the ordinary course of business with the United States Postal Service with postage fully prepaid. Place of mailing: Fresno,California 93724-0002 0n Date: 11/03/2021 ' Clerk, by ’ M&MJLLJ ,Deputy C.B. Rudder Nicolette Paullin \ Brett Schoél Johnson Moore Brett Schoel 100 E. Thousand Oaks Boulevard, Suite 229 La Follette, Johnson, DeHaas, Fesler & Ames Thousand Oaks, CA 91360 655 University Avenue, Suite 119 Sacramento, CA 95825 D Clerk's Certificate of Mailing Additional Address Page Attached TGN-06b R08-06 CLERK'S CERTIFICATE OF MAILING