Proof of Service: Henry Nutt vs. ASFC, LLC

• 
• 
• 
• 

						
                                
Preview
                                SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA             oCOUNTY OF FRESNO                       FOR COURT USE ONLY



                                       Fresno,
                                                 Civil
                                                 1130
                                                       Division
                                                       O Street
                                                California 93721-2220
                                                                                                               H   LEE
                                                                                                                     ,




                                                                                                              AUG    2‘:  2021
           PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER:          Henry Nufl
                                                                                                      FaESNo COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT
                                                                                                                            '




           DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT:          ASFC, llC                                                   B)

                                                                                                         CASE NUMBER:
                                                                                                                               DEEPE—
                 ORDER 0N       REQUEST     FOR   PRETRIAL    DISCOVERY       CONFERENCE                               21¢ECG00531

                                                                          ORDER
           The  Request for    Pretrial Discovery Conference       is:


            E    Denied.
                  Reoson(s)   for The Denial:

            D     Insufficient   meet 0nd confer      efforts prior To filingThe Request for    Pretrial Discovery Conference.
            D     Failure 10  make   request on the Mandatory local form.
            D     Failure ’ro provide o sufficient   summary     of The dispute.
            D     Failure to  provide a   proper privilege log.                        _




            D     Failure ’ro serve the opposing party with o        copy   of The Request for Pretrial    Discovery   Conference.
            E     Other: The Court's order pertains 10 the Two         pretrial discovery conference requests filed          by plaintiffs on
                  August   1 1,2021.


            K4     The Court   finds Thof ’rhe currenT dispute will not benefit     from o   Pretrial Discovery Conference.
                   X  Ploinfiff(s)  D   Defendcnfls)      D   Cross—comploinonfls)         D   Cross—defendanfls)       D  ther(s)    may file a
                      discovery motion limited To The dispute set out in The Request for Pretrial            Discovery Conference.
            D     Granted.


           ThelPretrial  Discovery   Conference     isset for                   ct        c.m.      in Deportmen’r

            D      Parties  ore ordered to bring     alldiscovery requests     and responses 0nd evidence          of oll meet 0nd confer
                   attempts.

            D      O’rher:




           The Time   for filingc1mofion    10 compel discovery on the disputed issues is folled          between The do’re of The filing       of
           The request   and the date     of The CourT' s order thereon.      CCP§201 6. 080(c) (2).    The Court calculates fhis 10 be
           1—3     days.   CCP §§1013 cmd       10130   (4) apply.

           Refusal of  ony counsel     to participofe'In   o Pretrial Discovery Conference shall        be grounds, in The discretion
           of The Court, for entry of   cm order adverse to the party represented by counsel so refusing, or adverse To counsel.

           A1 the conclusion of The Pretrial Discovery Conference, parties will be asked fo stipulate fhof 1he Court may is‘sue
           on order odjudicafing The merits of The discovery dispute, which is the subject of The Request for Pretrial Discovery
           Conference. See ofioched           stipulation.
                                          —




           Date:   8/24/2021                                                         (Qvfla        Judge of”
                                                                                                                     I   L
                                                                                                           1he Superior Court




           TCV'72 R0240              ORDER ON REQUEST FOR PRETRIAL DISCOVERY CONFERENCE                                           Local Rule 2-1 -17
                   SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA - COUNTY OF FRESNO                        -
                                                                                                     FOR COURTUSEONZ Y
                                   Civil Department. Central Division
                                              1 130
                                                    “O" Street
                                     Fresno, California   93724-0002
                                              (559) 457-2000

          TITLE 0F CASE:
            Henry Nutt vs. ASFC,    LLC

                                                                                                    CASE NUMBER:
                               CLERK'S CERTIFICATE 0F MAILING                                         21CECG00531
           Icertify thatIam   not a party to this cause and that a true copy of the:
                                                  ‘




                                                                         [Order]
          was placed    ina sealed envelope and placed for collection and mailing on the date and at the place          shown   below
          following our ordinary business practice.      |am   readily familiar with this court’s practice for collecting and processing
           correspondence for mailing.      On the same day that correspondence is placed for collection and mailing,          it is deposited

           in the ordinary course of business with the United States Postal Service with postage fully prepaid.




           Place of mailing:   Fresno,California     93724-0002
           On  Date:   08/24/2021                              Clerk, by                                                             ,Deputy
                                                                                                  R. Smith




           Nicolette Paullin                                                     Brétt Schoel
          Johnson   Moore                                                        Brett Schoel
          100 E. Thousand Oaks Boulevard, Suite 229                              La Follette, Johnson,   DeHaas,   Fesler &  Ames
          Thousand Oaks, CA 91 360                                               655 University Avenue, Suite 119
                                                                                 Sacramento,    CA 95825




         D    Clerk's Certificate of Mailing Additional   Address Page Attached
          TGN-06b R08-06                               CLERK'S CERTIFICATE OF MAILING