arrow left
arrow right
  • SHAWN IBRAHIM INC vs. HOUSTON-GALVESTON AREA LOCAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATI Debt/Contract - Consumer/DTPA document preview
  • SHAWN IBRAHIM INC vs. HOUSTON-GALVESTON AREA LOCAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATI Debt/Contract - Consumer/DTPA document preview
  • SHAWN IBRAHIM INC vs. HOUSTON-GALVESTON AREA LOCAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATI Debt/Contract - Consumer/DTPA document preview
						
                                

Preview

SHAWN IBRAHIM, INC., MAHMOOD § IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF AKHTAR, and MUHAMMAD AMIN § vs. § HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS HOUSTON-GALVESTON AREA § LOCAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION § . § 113 Defendant, Houston-Galveston Area Local Development Corporation (“CDC”) files its first amended answer to Plaintiffs’ petition and would respectfully show the Court the following: 1. CDC generally denies Plaintiffs’ allegations under Rule 92 of the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure and demands that Plaintiffs prove their allegations by a preponderance of the evidence and, 2. Defendant is a certified development corporation whose status and authority are derived from Section 504 of the Small Business Investment Act of 1958 (the “504 program”) and which serves solely to carry out a governmental function. (statutory purpose of the 504 Program is “to foster economic development, create or preserve job opportunities, and stimulate growth, expansion, and modernization of small businesses.”). Pursuant to governments), namely the Houston-Galveston Area Council of Governments (H-GAC). nning commission as a “politi state”). H-GAC’s function is to promote the economy of the of the Houston-Galveston region. 391.001. For this purpose H-GAC has created the CDC and (a) appoints and can remove the CDC’s board of directors, (b) has appointed H-GAC’s own executive director, Mr. Jack Steele, to serve as the executive director of the CDC, and (c) furnishes the staff of the CDC, who are compensated by H-GAC. CDC is thus a “governmental unit” within the meaning of the Texas Tort Claims Act, Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code Section 101.001(3)(D). 3. Governmental immunity from suit bars Plaintiffs’ claims against CDC. 4. Plaintiffs are barred by the doctrine of collateral estoppel from asserting that CDC did not 5. Plaintiffs lack standing to assert their claims against CDC. 6. Plaintiffs’ suit against CDC is barred by the applicable statute of limitations. 7. Plaintiffs have sued the wrong defendant, given that CDC has assigned its rights in the standby creditor agreement to SBA. 8. The Plaintiffs have waived their claims by failing to notify CDC or the SBA of the Sunnyland suit until after a final judgment against the Plaintiffs and in favor of Sunnyland had been For the foregoing reasons, Defendant Houston-Galveston Area Local Development Corporation respectfully requests that the Court, upon dispositive motion or trial on the merits, enter a final take nothing judgment in its favor and order Plaintiffs to pay its costs of court. Defendant also requests any other and further relief as the law and equity may allow. Respectfully submitted, By: /s/ Ramón G. Viada I certify that all counsel of record have been served a true and correct copy of the foregoing document in accordance with Tex. R. Civ. Proc. 21a by electronic submission for filing and service through the Texas Online EFiling for Courts and/or an approved Electronic Filing Service Provider Ramon G. Viada III